Hearn: BScene article was factually incorrect!

[kafkod]

you all sound f#cking pathetic. you'd be losing your mind if an american fighter got to swap out a different brand of gloves on fight night at home against a brit. never mind that they were not allowed to inspect the gloves themselves! this is dangerous territory. hearn and the BbboC will get somebody killed with this stuff. several boxers have died or gotten brain bleeds in the past few weeks. i really don't think you guys are as pathetic or as ignorant as you're letting on.

particularly at HW and when there are millions of dollars on the line these fights need to be fully transparent and fair. blood will be on your hands if you're complicit in this and somebody dies. you should lose sleep at night acting like a baby over all of this. white failed a drug test for an anabolic steroid and he was allowed to fight. an american journalist covering a fight in england is the only reason all of these wasn't covered up completely. this keeps f#cking happening.

nbody is going to fight for a major world title in england unless he's f#cking desperate. you guys are disgusting. you're going to stick your heads in the sand and somebody is goign to get beaten to death with tiny gloves at the hands of a juice freak like joshua.

If Hearn is lying about Whytes gloves being cleared as legal by WBC and BBBoC inspectors, then he is up shit creek without a paddle.

If he isn't lying, then Rivas was in no more danger of getting a brain bleed from the legal gloves Dillian wore than he would have been from the other gloves that Dillian didn't wear ... and you are crying and gnashing your teeth like the father of a murdered child over nothing.

[GGG Gloveking]

Ok, I accept that.

But Hearn says Anber and Yvon Michel were present when Whyte's gloves were inspected and cleared by both the BBBoC and the WBC. He also says Rivas was given the option of wearing the same gloves, but declined.

Clearly, there was nothing wrong with Whyte's gloves - or they wouldn't have been OK'd by the BBBoC and WBC inspectors - and Anber's objection was a technical one .. that they were different to the gloves Whyte had been tabbed to wear originally.

If Dillian's gloves were legal, does it really matter that they weren't the ones he originally selected?

I certainly get the point if they were inspected and accepted by both the BBBoC and WBC, but I feel it's against the whole purpose of the glove meeting, as well as bad sportsmanship in general, to not use the agreed upon gloves. It's very unprofessional to say the least if Whytes story of them being given to another fighter is true

[Alan Smithee]

I summed up what Hearn said in the interview. So what information did I get wrong there?

I am so ****** yet 99% of my info is on point. You summed up what Eddie Hearn said? The guy who is part of the cover-up! I posted reactions to the Whyte affair from promoters Frank Warren and Bob Arum. Take a few minutes and learn something. I'm sure Batman with a beard knows how to read.

[kafkod]

of course it does. don't f#cking open your mouth again if you don't understand why this is an issue. it's home cooking to give one fighter an unfair advantage. gloves are literally in a contract that you sign. at the weigh in both teams inspect and approve two sets of gloves. those gloves are then sealed and taken in by the commission. this is a big f#cking deal. this was home f#cking cooking at best, and an attempt to inflict serious, felonious harm, and a battery with a deadly weapon at the worst.


you guys make me sick. you've got blood on your hands.

You've got blood in your mangina. Go and buy yourself a packet of tampons, ffs.

[Alan Smithee]

Well, actually...

Anber explains that their appeal was filed before the contest took place on Saturday night

https://www.boxingscene.com/team-riv...-fight--141197

You beat me to it,lol. this Kafkod arsehole never knows what he is talking about yet ridicules others. The complaint was made before the fight! What a jerkoff!

[kafkod]

I certainly get the point if they were inspected and accepted by both the BBBoC and WBC, but I feel it's against the whole purpose of the glove meeting, as well as bad sportsmanship in general, to not use the agreed upon gloves. It's very unprofessional to say the least if Whytes story of them being given to another fighter is true

That's something that doesn't add up, now you mention it, because Eddie says Dillian didn't wear his original gloves because he couldn't get them on his hands properly.

But whatever the reason, I can't see how switching from one pair of legal gloves to another gave him any unfair advantage. It's not like Rivas would have trained any differently, or used a different game plan, based on the brand of gloves Dillian wore.

[kafkod]

You beat me to it,lol. this Kafkod arsehole never knows what he is talking about yet ridicules others. The complaint was made before the fight! What a jerkoff!

Nope ... a jerkoff is somebody who keeps on insisting he is right, even after somebody posts evidence showing him that he isn't, like you did with me the other day.

Like I said to you then, we all get stuff wrong sometimes, it's not something to be ashamed of.

[kafkod]

of course it does. don't f#cking open your mouth again if you don't understand why this is an issue. it's home cooking to give one fighter an unfair advantage. gloves are literally in a contract that you sign. at the weigh in both teams inspect and approve two sets of gloves. those gloves are then sealed and taken in by the commission. this is a big f#cking deal. this was home f#cking cooking at best, and an attempt to inflict serious, felonious harm, and a battery with a deadly weapon at the worst.


you guys make me sick. you've got blood on your hands.

I'm chuckling at that now. A boxing match becomes an attempt to inflict serious felonious harm, and a pair of legal, commission approved boxing gloves transforms into a deadly weapon ... because they weren't the gloves originally stipulated in a contract!

[GGG Gloveking]

That's something that doesn't add up, now you mention it, because Eddie says Dillian didn't wear his original gloves because he couldn't get them on his hands properly.

But whatever the reason, I can't see how switching from one pair of legal gloves to another gave him any unfair advantage. It's not like Rivas would have trained any differently, or used a different game plan, based on the brand of gloves Dillian wore.

On a personal level, I tend to agree. If theyre good gloves, with the padding in the right place, approved by the sanctioning and governing body, then it should be good. But, I've seen guys like Floyd make an issue over brand of gloves. Also, the fact that they have these glove meetings to agree upon the gloves, shows that the matter is of importance to the professionals.

According to what I've read, Whyte also had two pairs of gloves that were agreed upon, and wore neither pair. It just looks either underhanded or very amateurish from the Whyte camp

[Alan Smithee]

Nope ... a jerkoff is somebody who keeps on insisting he is right, even after somebody posts evidence showing him that he isn't, like you did with me the other day.

Like I said to you then, we all get stuff wrong sometimes, it's not something to be ashamed of.

The problem is that you never posted any evidence. I will repeat myself again for the fifteenth time. Never what I posted was my personal opinions on the Whyte situation. It was all sourced material. Was it 100% accurate. Maybe not but what is. As things have unfolded so far the info was pretty on point. You posted your personal opinions on the matter. What you assumed had happened and why. Big difference!