As a Mayweather fan I have to say it.

[chrisJS]

I think he’s clearly greater. Both are great but Manny definitely the notch above. He dared more and he has more stuff that stands out.

[FeFist]

Boxing is such a "what have you done for me lately" sport.

It was a great win for Pacquiao. It shows that this generation of fighters haven't stepped up to the plate. But he will not rank higher than Floyd.

He's in a situation where no matter what he does, it will add to Floyd's legacy as it will prove that he was not shot when Floyd made light work of him.

[hugh grant]

He's in a situation where no matter what he does, it will add to Floyd's legacy as it will prove that he was not shot when Floyd made light work of him.

Floyd fanboys always so unrealistic repeating same trash. Floyd ability to enhance legacy ended when he hung gloves up.
If pac beats Anthony Joshua it doesn’t mean Floyd does also, or the pac Floyd beat is as good as the pac who beat josh.
It means Floyd has never taken risk whilst pac continues to at 41. Floyd fanboys such fantasists warning pac to not dare get any greater as it will make Floyd greater? Isn’t it Floyd fanboys saying pacs ducking spence and crawford so full of contradictions Floyd fanboys.
So Floyd fans Answer me this. You want pac to beat nelo at 160 as it makes Floyd look greater does it? Floyd fans twist logic like they think they’re mind experts or something?

[bballchump11]

Yeah, and he would have destroyed Mayweather too.

Why couldn't he destroy Mayweather just 6 months earlier?

[Spoon23]

I never was one of Pac's fans... on the contrary...

... But he's now above Floyd in the "history" of this sport... tbh

... (and the "Floydtards" may cry as much as they want to...)

Well said. It just is..

[The Big Dunn]

Great win by Manny. If you are being completely honest this shows he wasn’t as done or shot when he fought Floyd.

I think it takes away from Manny’s winnif all you want to do is say it elevates him above Floyd. If we go out of our way to minimize everything floyd did then you end up minimizing Manny’s career achievements.

Beating Thurman is very good. Floyd has beaten men who are far superior even though they were much older than Thurman when Floyd fought them.

[travestyny]

No, Thurman doesn't put him higher than Floyd. He'll have a real argument if he gets past Spence or Crawford, however.

[KnockoutKings]

I think Canelo was Floyd's most impressive win. A 40yr old past his prime Pacman win over a young undefeated champ in his prime, is just as impressive. Maybe a little more considering age. Both ATGs

[hugh grant]

Great win by Manny. If you are being completely honest this shows he wasn’t as done or shot when he fought Floyd.

I think it takes away from Manny’s winnif all you want to do is say it elevates him above Floyd. If we go out of our way to minimize everything floyd did then you end up minimizing Manny’s career achievements.

Beating Thurman is very good. Floyd has beaten men who are far superior even though they were much older than Thurman when Floyd fought them.

Just admit you wanted Thurman to ko pac, jmm stylely. Because you know anything pac does at 41 further enhances the argument pac has always been greater than floyd. Even after jmm koed pac and Floyd controversially beat pac

[Beercules]

You said it all.



Prime, undefeated larger WW with no CW and beating him up.