As a Mayweather fan I have to say it.

[WholeSoul75]

Floyd just has too many hollow wins.

[Basco]

Yep, Floyd may be the better boxer but what Pacquiao accomplished is probably never gonna be duplicated ever.

Bingo! End of conversation!

[ADP02]

Great win by Manny. If you are being completely honest this shows he wasn’t as done or shot when he fought Floyd.

I think it takes away from Manny’s winnif all you want to do is say it elevates him above Floyd. If we go out of our way to minimize everything floyd did then you end up minimizing Manny’s career achievements.

Beating Thurman is very good. Floyd has beaten men who are far superior even though they were much older than Thurman when Floyd fought them.

Actually, if you are being honest,
- You would say that this fight shows that Manny was fighting with 1 arm in the Floyd fight.

- You would remind us all about Floyd's IV scandal while the NEVADA commission didn't allow Manny to take anything for his injured shoulder. NSAC was starting a full fledged investigation on Manny (who took nothing) but stopped once they found out that their home team guy (Floyd) had a scandal on his hands. No investigation for Floyd …. hmmmm!


Great fighters can lose and still …..:
If Ali had not fought Ken Norton after their first fight, does that elevate Ken Norton over Ali?

Holmes beat Ali in their only fight. Does that elevate Holmes over Ali?

If Ali had not fought Joe Frazier after their first fight, does that elevate Frazier over Ali?



There are fighters that give even the greats a tough fight, no matter what. Styles make fights. But the loser of the fight can still be considered the elevated one of the 2.



.

[Bad_Guy]

Manny had a better career than Floyd before this fight happened, so this fight does not really change that conversation. A H2H record with only one fight does not define someone's legacy.

[-PBP-]

This was a great win for Manny. Take nothing away from him. It adds to an already all time great resume but at the same time he was the favorite to win.

[HeadBodyBodyBody]

Pacquiao embodies more of what boxing should be about, definitely, as compared to Mayweather.

RE: ATG ranking, I'm not sure on that...

[uppercut510]

to be honest im just happy we got to witness these 2 greats in our time, mayweather will always be my fav above pac man but pac man is truly a gem and a warrior

[The Big Dunn]

Actually, if you are being honest,
- You would say that this fight shows that Manny was fighting with 1 arm in the Floyd fight.

- You would remind us all about Floyd's IV scandal while the NEVADA commission didn't allow Manny to take anything for his injured shoulder. NSAC was starting a full fledged investigation on Manny (who took nothing) but stopped once they found out that their home team guy (Floyd) had a scandal on his hands. No investigation for Floyd …. hmmmm!


Great fighters can lose and still …..:
If Ali had not fought Ken Norton after their first fight, does that elevate Ken Norton over Ali?

Holmes beat Ali in their only fight. Does that elevate Holmes over Ali?

If Ali had not fought Joe Frazier after their first fight, does that elevate Frazier over Ali?



There are fighters that give even the greats a tough fight, no matter what. Styles make fights. But the loser of the fight can still be considered the elevated one of the 2.



.

I refuse to engage with guys like you today. You have spent 3 years minimizing Floyd’s win over Manny.

If this were Floyd beating Thurman you’d be posting about how Thurman looked like crap against Lopez and that is why Floyd picked him. You be talking about the 2 years injury lay-off as well. You’d also be pointing out how Thurman “ hadn’t beaten anyone”.

Enough of guys like you. I have no desire to engage with any of you scummy pac fans today.

[WholeSoul75]

Floyd reneged a rematch with the only reason that pac was a poor sport. That excuse says plenty ..for me. Amazing how his fans still rally that.

[ADP02]

Actually, if you are being honest,
- You would say that this fight shows that Manny was fighting with 1 arm in the Floyd fight.

- You would remind us all about Floyd's IV scandal while the NEVADA commission didn't allow Manny to take anything for his injured shoulder. NSAC was starting a full fledged investigation on Manny (who took nothing) but stopped once they found out that their home team guy (Floyd) had a scandal on his hands. No investigation for Floyd …. hmmmm!


Great fighters can lose and still …..:
If Ali had not fought Ken Norton after their first fight, does that elevate Ken Norton over Ali?

Holmes beat Ali in their only fight. Does that elevate Holmes over Ali?

If Ali had not fought Joe Frazier after their first fight, does that elevate Frazier over Ali?



There are fighters that give even the greats a tough fight, no matter what. Styles make fights. But the loser of the fight can still be considered the elevated one of the 2.



.

I refuse to engage with guys like you today. You have spent 3 years minimizing Floyd’s win over Manny.

If this were Floyd beating Thurman you’d be posting about how Thurman looked like crap against Lopez and that is why Floyd picked him. You be talking about the 2 years injury lay-off as well. You’d also be pointing out how Thurman “ hadn’t beaten anyone”.

Enough of guys like you. I have no desire to engage with any of you scummy pac fans today.

You said be honest. You were omitting key points so I had to point some of that out (there are more). I was just being honest but you just deflected!



.