Mayweather takes a MASSIVE dive in the history books tonight (RIP floyd)

[BoloShot]

but, toodles..... it is clearly one sided, it aint even close.....

I don't like either and consider neither the best ever but Pacquiao has the better resumé and list of achievements. Thing is both were drug using, weight draining cheats most likely.

[Curtis Harper]

I don't like either and consider neither the best ever but Pacquiao has the better resumé and list of achievements. Thing is both were drug using, weight draining cheats most likely.

Those last 2 words fu cked up your whole post

[hugh grant]

like I said earlier.....

* Floyd beat more higher-level opponents, which is the only thing that counts

* Floyd beat him head-to-head, when Pac was a natural welter

* Floyd never got knocked down..... knocked out..... or lost

Half of floyd's resume are unknowns. Out of the 25 who are known only about 10 opponents are worth talking about. Pac s 8 wins over jmm, bradkey, morales, barrera alone equates to the entire business end of floyds entire resume. resume

Too strong in depth Pac s resume for floyd. When talking about the facts of Pac s resume being much stronger than floyds, Pac s additional.wins over cotto, hatton, dlh, and thurman don't even need to be bought up. Pac don't even.need to go into his reserves

[Curtis Harper]

I still can't find that history book

[The D3vil]

WRONG !!


I said that Mr " anyone from 154-168 " should fight Ward at 168 to prove that he is not full-of-shlt

and..... Lara was willing to fight Pooseykin at 160

And Manny was willing to fight Floyd in 2009, and 2010, and 2011, and 2012, and 2013, and 2014, but something kept putting it off . . . Hmmm

[The D3vil]

FACT: before Thurman, Floyd is WAAAAAY ahead of Manny

FACT: after Thurman, Floyd is still WAAAAAY ahead of Manny

you are badly over-rating Pac's win over Thurman





it is ridiculous to suggest that Pacquiao beating Thurman at 40yo..... is even close to Mayweather beating Pacquiao when he was 38yo

Mayweather simply has more higher-level wins than Pacquiao

he also never got dropped..... never got ktfo..... and never lost

#notevenclose

Manny was not WAYYYY behind Floyd on anything as he's the only 8 division champ in boxing history and is universally considered a top 10-20 ATG, as is Floyd.

Now, you may have your particular opinion.

I'm talking boxing historians and writers who have ranked both fairly similarly.

https://www.espn.com/boxing/story/_/...oxers-25-years

https://www.espn.com/boxing/story/_/...oxers-25-years

https://sports.yahoo.com/news/where-...34-boxing.html

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/ot...-pictures.html

And even if you're ranking Manny's win "overrated", what does it say that Floyd would never even consider fighting an undefeated champion, who's a decade younger than him , in his prime at 40?

Floyd could've fought Thurman anytime and chose not to.

Floyd could've fought Spence, Crawford, Porter, Garcia, or even Amir Khan at anytime in the past 5 years and has chosen not to.

Floyd's fxcking around with MMA fighters and kickboxers instead of fighting anybody who's legitimate.

Now, I'm not saying Floyd would lose all or any of those fights, but it says a lot that he won't even take the risk of looking bad, whereas Manny has always been willing to look bad and fight guys who could beat him sometimes 3 or 4 times if need be.

[aboutfkntime]

I don't like either and consider neither the best ever but Pacquiao has the better resumé and list of achievements. Thing is both were drug using, weight draining cheats most likely.

you are just a typical ***wit casual-fan..... nothing more

you REEKED of dopey casual-fan, the very first day you logged on

just saying

Mayweather > Pacquiao..... and it is not even close

not only does Mayweather have a bigger list of higher-level opponents..... he did not get dropped/KTFO multiple times, and suffer multiple losses

Pac got KTFO by guys who do not even deserve to enter the ring with Mayweather

it is not even close..... so, you are just a casual-fan fool

[aboutfkntime]

Half of floyd's resume are unknowns. Out of the 25 who are known only about 10 opponents are worth talking about. Pac s 8 wins over jmm, bradkey, morales, barrera alone equates to the entire business end of floyds entire resume. resume

Too strong in depth Pac s resume for floyd. When talking about the facts of Pac s resume being much stronger than floyds, Pac s additional.wins over cotto, hatton, dlh, and thurman don't even need to be bought up. Pac don't even.need to go into his reserves

Pacquiao/Canelo > anyone on pacs resume

you do not need to dig any further

also..... pac got knocked the FCUK out multiple times.....

come on man, EVERYONE used to knock pac out

you talk about Floyd beating guys who nobody ever heard of..... but Pac got KTFO by guys who nobody ever heard of LMAO

[aboutfkntime]

And Manny was willing to fight Floyd in 2009, and 2010, and 2011, and 2012, and 2013, and 2014, but something kept putting it off . . . Hmmm

Manny ducked random blood testing !!

hmmm, now..... I wonder why he did that ?



Pac either ducked Floyd, or he was juicing..... take your pick

[aboutfkntime]

Manny was not WAYYYY behind Floyd on anything as he's the only 8 division champ in boxing history and is universally considered a top 10-20 ATG, as is Floyd.

Now, you may have your particular opinion.

I'm talking boxing historians and writers who have ranked both fairly similarly.

https://www.espn.com/boxing/story/_/...oxers-25-years

https://www.espn.com/boxing/story/_/...oxers-25-years

https://sports.yahoo.com/news/where-...34-boxing.html

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/ot...-pictures.html

And even if you're ranking Manny's win "overrated", what does it say that Floyd would never even consider fighting an undefeated champion, who's a decade younger than him , in his prime at 40?

Floyd could've fought Thurman anytime and chose not to.

Floyd could've fought Spence, Crawford, Porter, Garcia, or even Amir Khan at anytime in the past 5 years and has chosen not to.

Floyd's fxcking around with MMA fighters and kickboxers instead of fighting anybody who's legitimate.

Now, I'm not saying Floyd would lose all or any of those fights, but it says a lot that he won't even take the risk of looking bad, whereas Manny has always been willing to look bad and fight guys who could beat him sometimes 3 or 4 times if need be.

I don't care what those hacks say, I am talking about REAL historians..... ones that history will remember

FACT: Mayweather scaled higher mountains than Pacquiao

it only takes one fight, one elite opponent

FACT: Pacquiao/Canelo are better than any wins on Pacs resume

if his rivalry with Marquez was recorded correctly, Pacquiao would have either 8/9/10 losses on his record..... depending on how you scored the 1st/2nd fights..... because he clearly lost the 3rd LMAO

Pac lost to guys who do not even deserve to step in the ring with Floyd..... so you guys are dreaming

10 losses !!