Mayweather takes a MASSIVE dive in the history books tonight (RIP floyd)

[hugh grant]

Pacquiao/Canelo > anyone on pacs resume

you do not need to dig any further

also..... pac got knocked the FCUK out multiple times.....

come on man, EVERYONE used to knock pac out

you talk about Floyd beating guys who nobody ever heard of..... but Pac got KTFO by guys who nobody ever heard of LMAO

Pac s win over thurman is better than anything on flouds resume. Nobody in history did what Pac did. Whilst Floyd beating jmm used goods. Floyd s not very impressive, controversial win over pac is nice on floyds resume but hardly like climbing mount everest like pac s win over thurman.
Floyds win over green, cw nel o is impressive to you is it? You've low standards for floyd. Pac s win over cotto and margarita more impressive me thinks

[Curtis Harper]

Any way you slice it;

May >>>>>> Pac

Pac finally fought and beat a live body with power.......(who was inactive).

1 tune up and May will be p4p/ppv king again.

[aboutfkntime]

We've already gone over that. You've reduced your argument to calling me a casual. Your opinion is only an opinion, learn to calm the **** down. Not many if anyone is ever going to agree with you for good reason.

You said that I provided..... " literally no argument ".....

despite the fact that I provided the..... " whole "..... argument

Mayweather > Pacquiao..... and it is not even close

not only does Mayweather have a bigger list of higher-level opponents..... he did not get dropped/KTFO multiple times, and suffer multiple losses

Pac got KTFO by guys who do not even deserve to enter the ring with Mayweather

it is not even close..... so, you are just a casual-fan fool

[aboutfkntime]

Pac s win over thurman is better than anything on flouds resume. Nobody in history did what Pac did. Whilst Floyd beating jmm used goods. Floyd s not very impressive, controversial win over pac is nice on floyds resume but hardly like climbing mount everest like pac s win over thurman.
Floyds win over green, cw nel o is impressive to you is it? You've low standards for floyd. Pac s win over cotto and margarita more impressive me thinks

nope, it was just a very good (for his age) win over a largely unproven mid-level welter..... who's only good win was scraping past Shawn Porter, another mid-level welter

that is all

most of Mayweather's opponents were better than Keith Thurman

[aboutfkntime]

b,b,b,b,but.....

[hugh grant]

nope, it was just a very good (for his age) win over a largely unproven mid-level welter..... who's only good win was scraping past Shawn Porter, another mid-level welter

that is all

most of Mayweather's opponents were better than Keith Thurman

You don't sound very convinced, your usually very sarcastic but now trying to be calm I've affected you in pit of your stomach as you know i tell truth.
Yes it was a very good win for Pac s age to say the least.
Pac s win over thurman is better than anything on floyds resume. In 100 years history will just see a 40 year old, former flyweight with a 23 year career and 70 fights beaten young undefeated lion in prime. Cautious Floyd isn't known for great wins. He's just known for people being su****ious of his unbeaten record.

[Dosumpthin]

Pac s win over thurman is better than anything on floyds resume.

because Thurman was a....

young undefeated lion in prime.

For years Mayhaters claim the "Zero" means nothing yet now I'm seeing Thurmans "Zero" elevate Manny to top 5 ATG great.


Explain to me why Thurmans "undefeated" resume holds more weight than Floyd's "undefeated " resume.


Is it because Manny beat Thurman but lost to Floyd perhaps?

You don't sound very convinced, your usually very sarcastic but now trying to be calm I've affected you in pit of your stomach as you know i tell truth.
Yes it was a very good win for Pac s age to say the least.
Pac s win over thurman is better than anything on floyds resume. In 100 years history will just see a 40 year old, former flyweight with a 23 year career and 70 fights beaten young undefeated lion in prime. Cautious Floyd isn't known for great wins. He's just known for people being su****ious of his unbeaten record.

lol. haters cant write a full paragraph without contradicting themselves.

[hugh grant]

because Thurman was a....




For years Mayhaters claim the "Zero" means nothing yet now I'm seeing Thurmans "Zero" elevate Manny to top 5 ATG great.


Explain to me why Thurmans "undefeated" resume holds more weight than Floyd's "undefeated " resume.


Is it because Manny beat Thurman but lost to Floyd perhaps?










lol. haters cant write a full paragraph without contradicting themselves.

You are writing a lot but not meaning much.
Pac took an unbeaten record off a prime natural WW at 40 years of age and 71 fights, something never done before. I'm not implying Thurmans zero means more than floyds. I'm saying thurman is in prime and Pac s 10 years past prime.
Traditionally look at boxing lifespan of former flyweights. Context, context, context.

[aboutfkntime]

You don't sound very convinced, your usually very sarcastic but now trying to be calm I've affected you in pit of your stomach as you know i tell truth.
Yes it was a very good win for Pac s age to say the least.
Pac s win over thurman is better than anything on floyds resume. In 100 years history will just see a 40 year old, former flyweight with a 23 year career and 70 fights beaten young undefeated lion in prime. Cautious Floyd isn't known for great wins. He's just known for people being su****ious of his unbeaten record.

nope, that is just your silly rubbish Hughie

most Mayweather opponents were better than Thurman

in 100 years time..... historians will write about a guy who was a great fighter, who had a great career..... but who lost a lot of fights..... who got KTFO a few times..... who lost to his greatest rival..... and who could never solve the Marquez puzzle despite having 4x attempts

oh, and they will also write about ducking random blood tests

[hugh grant]

nope, that is just your silly rubbish Hughie

most Mayweather opponents were better than Thurman

in 100 years time..... historians will write about a guy who was a great fighter, who had a great career..... but who lost a lot of fights..... who got KTFO a few times..... who lost to his greatest rival..... and who could never solve the Marquez puzzle despite having 4x attempts

oh, and they will also write about ducking random blood tests

History will see Floyd ducked thurman for berto. And that Pac cared about legacy so waited for himself to be older to become oldest ever WW champ and beating the man Floyd dodged killing 2 birds with 1 stone