Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Mayweather takes a MASSIVE dive in the history books tonight (RIP floyd)

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
    you are just a typical ***wit casual-fan..... nothing more

    you REEKED of dopey casual-fan, the very first day you logged on

    just saying

    Mayweather > Pacquiao..... and it is not even close

    not only does Mayweather have a bigger list of higher-level opponents..... he did not get dropped/KTFO multiple times, and suffer multiple losses

    Pac got KTFO by guys who do not even deserve to enter the ring with Mayweather

    it is not even close..... so, you are just a casual-fan fool
    Dude you have literally no argument but "casual". I think you're a bit of a one trick pony. As I said neither are nearly as good as advertised. Your opinion is just that and it's funny watching you try to convince people (and fail miserably to do so). I've been quite sensible compared to most fans on here, I don't like being biased towards one or another too much unless they're Irish. So yeah, I think you'll just be placed on the ignore list because you're very one note and have nothing interesting to say ever. Just this same argument over and over, you know the definition of insanity, right? Look into it for your own sake.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by BoloShot View Post
      Dude you have literally no argument but "casual". I think you're a bit of a one trick pony. As I said neither are nearly as good as advertised. Your opinion is just that and it's funny watching you try to convince people (and fail miserably to do so). I've been quite sensible compared to most fans on here, I don't like being biased towards one or another too much unless they're Irish. So yeah, I think you'll just be placed on the ignore list because you're very one note and have nothing interesting to say ever. Just this same argument over and over, you know the definition of insanity, right? Look into it for your own sake.


      this is the post you replied to.....

      Mayweather > Pacquiao..... and it is not even close

      not only does Mayweather have a bigger list of higher-level opponents..... he did not get dropped/KTFO multiple times, and suffer multiple losses

      Pac got KTFO by guys who do not even deserve to enter the ring with Mayweather


      it is not even close..... so, you are just a casual-fan fool



      you are just a typical shlt-talking casual-fan ***wit LMAO

      seen it all before, many times

      Comment


      • Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
        I don't care what those hacks say, I am talking about REAL historians..... ones that history will remember

        FACT: Mayweather scaled higher mountains than Pacquiao

        it only takes one fight, one elite opponent

        FACT: Pacquiao/Canelo are better than any wins on Pacs resume

        if his rivalry with Marquez was recorded correctly, Pacquiao would have either 8/9/10 losses on his record..... depending on how you scored the 1st/2nd fights..... because he clearly lost the 3rd LMAO

        Pac lost to guys who do not even deserve to step in the ring with Floyd..... so you guys are dreaming

        10 losses !!
        Sugar Ray Robinson lost 19 times and most people think he's GOAT

        Roberto Duran lost 15 times.

        Stop it.

        Like I said, when you fight everybody and don't duck anybody, you lose. Even Muhammad Ali said that.

        And as I said, Mayweather doesn't get some of the decisions that he got, if he wasn't always fighting in his backyard.

        Manny turned pro a year before Floyd did, but has fought 20 more times than he has, in his opponent's home country much of the time.

        He's been robbed multiple times and everyone knows this.

        Mayweather has not scaled "higher mountains", because he never fought outside of his home country and wouldn't leave his backyard or fight his most dangerous opponents when they were at their best.

        He aint Muhammad Ali fighting a young George Foreman, while he was old and knocking him out.

        That's scaling the highest mountains.

        Not fighting guys before or after they're in their primes in your backyard on your terms all the time.

        Like I said, Floyd chose security and money, and got it.

        He will always be considered a cherry picker and less ambitious than a guy who scaled 8 divisions, fighting the scariest dudes, often in their home countries. Get over it.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by The D3vil View Post
          Sugar Ray Robinson lost 19 times and most people think he's GOAT

          Roberto Duran lost 15 times.

          Stop it.

          Like I said, when you fight everybody and don't duck anybody, you lose. Even Muhammad Ali said that.

          And as I said, Mayweather doesn't get some of the decisions that he got, if he wasn't always fighting in his backyard.

          Manny turned pro a year before Floyd did, but has fought 20 more times than he has, in his opponent's home country much of the time.

          He's been robbed multiple times and everyone knows this.

          Mayweather has not scaled "higher mountains", because he never fought outside of his home country and wouldn't leave his backyard or fight his most dangerous opponents when they were at their best.

          He aint Muhammad Ali fighting a young George Foreman, while he was old and knocking him out.

          That's scaling the highest mountains.

          Not fighting guys before or after they're in their primes in your backyard on your terms all the time.

          Like I said, Floyd chose security and money, and got it.

          He will always be considered a cherry picker and less ambitious than a guy who scaled 8 divisions, fighting the scariest dudes, often in their home countries. Get over it.



          and yet, the 2x facts remain.....

          FACT: Mayweather has more better higher-level wins than Pacquiao..... which is the ONLY relevant criteria

          you mentioning, the number of fights... the year Pac started boxing... the weight Pac started boxing... where they fought... how they fought... that is all just irrelevant fanboy garbage

          who you beat..... with consideration given to when/how

          Mayweather > Pacquiao

          FACT: having NO losses... is much better than having 8/9/10 losses

          Pac got KTFO by guys who do not even deserve to enter the ring with Mayweather

          it is not even close man..... only silly pac-tards insist the Pacquiao is better than Mayweather

          Comment


          • Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
            Manny ducked random blood testing !!

            hmmm, now..... I wonder why he did that ?



            Pac either ducked Floyd, or he was juicing..... take your pick

            Oh please, Mayweather fought Shane Mosley & Andre Berto, who were both huge drug cheats. Now all of a sudden he cares about doping in boxing?

            Yeah right.

            He waited until Manny slowed down and had gotten knocked out, simple as that.

            Worst part is, I think he would've won in 2011, but once again, he doesn't like risk, so he bxtched out.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by The D3vil View Post
              Oh please, Mayweather fought Shane Mosley & Andre Berto, who were both huge drug cheats. Now all of a sudden he cares about doping in boxing?

              Yeah right.

              He waited until Manny slowed down and had gotten knocked out, simple as that.

              Worst part is, I think he would've won in 2011, but once again, he doesn't like risk, so he bxtched out.


              FACT: everyone who agreed to testing, got that fight
              FACT: NOBODY else had a problem with drug testing, just PED-Pac
              FACT: when Pac finally agree to random blood tests, the 8 ridiculous excuses that he used to avoid Mayweather last time were not even mentioned..... NOT ONCE

              those 8 vitally-important (ridiculous) excuses just up and completely disappeared..... never to be seen again LMAO

              you try accentuating irrelevant positives..... but, what about the negatives?

              Mayweather had one catchweight fight..... but Pac campaigned at manny-weight 143/144, where he dragged the little guys up, and pulled the big guys down..... he had like 8/9 CONSECUTIVE weight-affected fights

              Pac's career is also highly su****ious..... he is the only fighter in history to have killed a super-fight by refusing random blood tests..... and while he was refusing drug tests, Pac was a 1200+ punch dynamo, who never looked tired at the end of his fights..... but when he finally agreed to testing, Pac was just a normal 400-500 punch fighter like everyone else, and he suddenly looked tired at the end of his fights

              Manny NEVER solved the Marquez puzzle, not once..... and yet Mayweather drubbed JMM in a very one-sided fight, proving that he is in a different class

              come on man, lay off the kool-aid..... Mayweather > Pacquiao..... it is not even close
              Last edited by aboutfkntime; 07-25-2019, 08:15 PM.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
                and yet, the 2x facts remain.....

                FACT: Mayweather has more better higher-level wins than Pacquiao..... which is the ONLY relevant criteria

                you mentioning, the number of fights... the year Pac started boxing... the weight Pac started boxing... where they fought... how they fought... that is all just irrelevant fanboy garbage

                who you beat..... with consideration given to when/how

                Mayweather > Pacquiao

                FACT: having NO losses... is much better than having 8/9/10 losses

                Pac got KTFO by guys who do not even deserve to enter the ring with Mayweather

                it is not even close man..... only silly pac-tards insist the Pacquiao is better than Mayweather
                FACT: Mayweather has more better higher-level wins than Pacquiao..... which is the ONLY relevant criteria
                According to who? You?

                I don't call fighting people in your own backyard where the chance of you losing is nil "high-level"

                you mentioning, the number of fights... the year Pac started boxing... the weight Pac started boxing... where they fought... how they fought... that is all just irrelevant fanboy garbage
                That's funny because, I'm not a huge fan of Pac or Mayweather and admittedly had Mayweather ahead of Pacquiao until Saturday night, where I had to admit that the Senator keeps fighting real competition into his 40s while Floyd has always played it safe.

                FACT: having NO losses... is much better than having 8/9/10 losses
                Apparently not to the rest of the world that considers Robinson, Duran, Ali, Leonard, Armstrong, Greb, ahead of Floyd P4P, in spite of all their losses.

                Hell, guy in your sig lost 14 times.

                I guess he was a real scrub, huh?

                Comment


                • Originally posted by The D3vil View Post
                  According to who? You?

                  I don't call fighting people in your own backyard where the chance of you losing is nil "high-level"

                  FACT: Mayweather has more better higher-level wins than Pacquiao..... which is the ONLY relevant criteria

                  so if those guys had no chance of winning, that is because Mayweather is so good

                  you are correct..... everyone had a punchers chance with Pac, most had no chance with Floyd


                  That's funny because, I'm not a huge fan of Pac or Mayweather and admittedly had Mayweather ahead of Pacquiao until Saturday night, where I had to admit that the Senator keeps fighting real competition into his 40s while Floyd has always played it safe.

                  you thinking that Pac beating Thurman, who is likely only the 5th best welter, and whos only good win is scraping past Shawn Porter..... could somehow elevate him above Mayweather..... is highly amusing

                  pull your head out of your ass you muppet..... there is a damn good reason why prior to that fight, NOBODY suggested that Pac beating Thurman would put him ahead of Floyd..... and that is because it is utter nonsense, that would be soundly ridiculed..... but, here you are, doing just that LMAO


                  Apparently not to the rest of the world that considers Robinson, Duran, Ali, Leonard, Armstrong, Greb, ahead of Floyd P4P, in spite of all their losses.

                  Hell, guy in your sig lost 14 times.

                  I guess he was a real scrub, huh?

                  FACT: being unbeaten, after facing 25+ world champions..... is a LOT better than having 8/9/10 losses, after facing a dozen world champions

                  very few would argue with that, including Robinson, Duran, Ali, Leonard, Armstrong, Greb, and Carpentier

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by The D3vil View Post
                    Sugar Ray Robinson lost 19 times and most people think he's GOAT

                    Roberto Duran lost 15 times.

                    Stop it.

                    Like I said, when you fight everybody and don't duck anybody, you lose. Even Muhammad Ali said that.

                    And as I said, Mayweather doesn't get some of the decisions that he got, if he wasn't always fighting in his backyard.

                    Manny turned pro a year before Floyd did, but has fought 20 more times than he has, in his opponent's home country much of the time.

                    He's been robbed multiple times and everyone knows this.

                    Mayweather has not scaled "higher mountains", because he never fought outside of his home country and wouldn't leave his backyard or fight his most dangerous opponents when they were at their best.

                    He aint Muhammad Ali fighting a young George Foreman, while he was old and knocking him out.

                    That's scaling the highest mountains.

                    Not fighting guys before or after they're in their primes in your backyard on your terms all the time.

                    Like I said, Floyd chose security and money, and got it.

                    He will always be considered a cherry picker and less ambitious than a guy who scaled 8 divisions, fighting the scariest dudes, often in their home countries. Get over it.
                    He's the worst troll on this site I haven't been here long but I've learned already to just disengage. There's no reasoning with this guy.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
                      this is the post you replied to.....






                      you are just a typical shlt-talking casual-fan ***wit LMAO

                      seen it all before, many times
                      We've already gone over that. You've reduced your argument to calling me a casual. Your opinion is only an opinion, learn to calm the **** down. Not many if anyone is ever going to agree with you for good reason.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP