Why does GGG always get credit for imaginary wins???

[Robbie Barrett]

Mayweather looked as good as ever vs that little asian kid. He can go on a 20 ko streak if he stays fighting that lvl of opposition.

And i just took you off ignore.

Are you ******? Vanes was the same level of competition prime Golovkin fought. You have no other way to compare.

[Robbie Barrett]

Jacobs isn't Canelo, you fckn idiot.

So Weisfeld is only biased when he doesn't score it for Golovkin? Righto.

[SplitSecond]

Are you ******? Vanes was the same level of competition prime Golovkin fought. You have no other way to compare.

How is fighting a 2 year inactive 154lb’er at middleweight the same as fighting top 10 middleweights like murray?

You can easily see the decline in golovkin. He could still beat guys like stevens and murray because that’s how far above him he was, but it wouldn’t be in the same fashion.

[Robbie Barrett]

How is fighting a 2 year inactive 154lb’er at middleweight the same as fighting top 10 middleweights like murray?

Both are C level. Golovkin struggled as soon as he stepped up in competition. People want to claim it's because he's past prime instead. Not the case. He just was never that good to begin with.

[Robbie Barrett]

How is fighting a 2 year inactive 154lb’er at middleweight the same as fighting top 10 middleweights like murray?

You can easily see the decline in golovkin. He could still beat guys like stevens and murray because that’s how far above him he was, but it wouldn’t be in the same fashion.

The 3 most talented fighter he fought he got lit up against. Canelo, Jacobs and Brook. It was the step up in competition not being past prime. He still destroys bums like he used to.

[kafkod]

If he cant see that Cotto and Lara are levels above Murray and Lemieux in terms of talent and boxing ability P4P he should make less threads and watch more boxing.

P4P prime Cotto is as far above Lara as he is above Murray and Lemieux.

But Canelo didn't beat prime Cotto at SLW or WW.

[Robbie Barrett]

P4P prime Cotto is as far above Lara as he is above Murray and Lemieux.

But Canelo didn't beat prime Cotto at SLW or WW.

The Cotto and Lara Canelo beat was levels above Murray and Lemieux, stop being ****ing delusional.

[Pac=Duran]

Whenever the topic of his weak resume comes up you have people who always make excuses and say bu but but he would've beat those guys anyway!!! The most special of geetards try to compare his resume to the great Canelo, saying sht like "he would beat guys like trout, Lara and Cotto as well"

Ok? The G never fought them though so he can't get any credit for it on his weak ass resume. And of course a career 160 pounder In G would be favored over these smaller men.

Get a grip. In a geetards mind he also has imaginary wins over Martinez , Sturm, froch, etc

Everyone swerved him for a reason

[kafkod]

How is fighting a 2 year inactive 154lb’er at middleweight the same as fighting top 10 middleweights like murray?

You can easily see the decline in golovkin. He could still beat guys like stevens and murray because that’s how far above him he was, but it wouldn’t be in the same fashion.

Murray was rated second best MW in the world when GGG fought him. He would have been undefeated and the unified WBA super and WBC champion if he hadn't been robbed against Sturm in Germany and Martinez in Argentina.

[kafkod]

The Cotto and Lara Canelo beat was levels above Murray and Lemieux, stop being ****ing delusional.

Lara was never anything special and Cotto was a faded SLW/WW. Neither of them were any better than prime Murray when they fought Canelo.