Why does GGG always get credit for imaginary wins???
Collapse
-
-
-
Think about the fact that you can't read. I know you have a teeny tiny brain but do yourself a favor and reread what I wrote. You are embarrassing yourself. Again...Comment
-
I can tell you've got some strong opinions about Golovkin. if you can come up with some facts {things that can be verified) I'm happy to continue the discussion.
Ex."Floyd was great" (Opinion) "Floyd was 50-0"(Fact)Comment
-
You don't get it. "Great" is a judgement. It can't be proven the way you can prove a fighter's won and loss record. A person can have an "educated" opinion or the y can be totally ignorant. Since opinions by their nature can't be proven or disproved, what's the sense of an argument that has no satisfactory ending.
I can tell you've got some strong opinions about Golovkin. if you can come up with some facts {things that can be verified) I'm happy to continue the discussion.
Ex."Floyd was great" (Opinion) "Floyd was 50-0"(Fact)Comment
-
these are the 5 champs GGG has defeated..
Kassim Ouma, Daniel Geale, David Lemieux, Kell Brook, and Daniel Jacobs.Comment
-
A quick example. "Alvarez destroyed GGG in the 2nd Fight." (Judgement)
"Alvarez won the 2nd fight by a MD." (Fact)
I don't argue opinions.Comment
-
You don't get it. "Great" is a judgement. It can't be proven the way you can prove a fighter's won and loss record. A person can have an "educated" opinion or the y can be totally ignorant. Since opinions by their nature can't be proven or disproved, what's the sense of an argument that has no satisfactory ending.
I can tell you've got some strong opinions about Golovkin. if you can come up with some facts {things that can be verified) I'm happy to continue the discussion.
Ex."Floyd was great" (Opinion) "Floyd was 50-0"(Fact)
it can so
why are you so eager to ride the short-bus with the other casuals?
beating a good fighter............ is a good win
beating a very good fighter..... is a very good win
beating an excellent fighter..... is an excellent win
beating a great fighter............ is a great win
this is Golovkin's resume'.....
NOTE: I only count opponents who are better than " good "
- Jacobs *
- Murray
2x good, to very-good, wins
conclusion: Golovkin is a good, to very good, fighter
FACT: the best win on Golovkin's resume was a HUGE underdog who nobody gave a chance
FACT: the best win on Canelo's resume is a supposed killer who nobody thought he could beat
BIG diff there !!Comment
-
two of those guys were decidedly average
one of them did not belong at middleweight
one was better than average, but then got stopped by a guy who weighed 153
Jacobs was a HUGE underdog, and nobody gave him a chance
#averageComment
Comment