Why does GGG always get credit for imaginary wins???

[aboutfkntime]

he thinks that Golovkin has faced more quality opposition than almost any other fighter in history.....

https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?t=824905

[aboutfkntime]

I rate Golovkin very highly

in a thread titled.....

" Why does GGG always get credit for imaginary wins??? "

you were ****** enough to say that G has " 5-6 'great' wins ".....

but, you were then completely unable to even name 1 of those..... "great" wins LMAO

how fkn ironic is that ? LMAO

what is more ironic.....

you, providing a PERFECT demonstration why Golovkin's idiot fanbase give him credit for imaginary wins.....

or, you..... misquoting Steve Weisfeld to favor Golovkin, but being completely unaware that he judged the fight? loooool

oh lordie LMAO

please..... make my day by explaining why you think that Murray, Lemieux, Vanes, and Monroe..... were better wins for Hypekin..... then Lara, Cotto, Mosley, and Trout, are..... for Canelo

then, you can make my year by explaining why you think that Bika, Barrera, and Miranda..... are as good as Andre Ward lol

you dribbling spastic casual-fan idiot

just need somewhere to record your ******ity, this thread is appropriate




--------------------------------------------------------
Boxing1013..... PERSONAL WALL OF ******ITY
--------------------------------------------------------

thinks that Golovkin has a better resume than Canelo.....

I just made a thread about specifically why people rate Canelo's resume as better than GGG's...and I laid out my case as to why I rate GGG's better.....
https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/s...d.php?t=820918

----------------------------

thinks that one of the " killers " on Golovkin's resume could have beaten Canelo.... but he will not say which one LMAO

I don't think Canelo would have gotten all of his guys out by KO and maybe would not have 'won' all of them.....
https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/s...820918&page=10

----------------------------

thinks that Murray Lemieux Monroe and Vanes, are better wins for Golovkin..... than Lara Cotto Trout and Mosley, are for Canelo.....

Canelo's top wins would be Lara..Jacobs and Cotto imo...GGG's would be Jacobs, Murray and Lemieux...I don't see a ton of separation there..... winning 7-5 vs a great Lara...and going 12 with a shot fat Cotto...is not imo better than 8 Round destruction of Lemieux...and 11 round destruction of Murray..... Vanes was inactive and moving up in weight...but he wasn't shot like SSM more or less was..... I don't think going 12 with Mosley when Canelo did, or 12 with Trout, are better wins than GGG running through Monroe and Geale.....
https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/s...820918&page=16

----------------------------


thinks that Andre Ward is no better than Bika Barrera and Miranda

I just never really saw the skills from him..... if he was born in a different country I don't think he would have been looked at much differently than Bika Barrera or Miranda etc.....
https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/s...2#post19903762

----------------------------

thinks that Golovkin has 5-6 'great' wins..... but cannot even name 1 of those 'great' wins

Yeah he has about 10+ good wins imo...and 5-6 'great' wins if you want to term it that...great fighter, great career...an ATG at MW...that's pretty clear I think..... If a great win is a dominant win over another prime great fighter...I would say GGG has quite a few tbh.....
https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/s...821123&page=20

----------------------------

creates a thread misquoting Steve Weisfeld.....

Boxing1013 attempted to remove defence, ring generalship, and effective aggression, as official scoring criteria..... to justify why he thinks Golovkin beat Canelo in their rematch..... but, had NO IDEA that Steve Weisfeld was AN OFFICIAL JUDGE at the Canelo/Golovkin rematch..... and Weisfeld scored that fight for Canelo looool
https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/s...d.php?t=818903

-------------------------------

[aboutfkntime]

Because you and your just as ****** ilk has no response.

to what..... ?

..... to that silly " sarcasm "..... ?

true ^^

[stealthradon]

oh, you were being sarcastic ?

good to know

now I do not need to respond to the rest of that dribbley excuse-filled post

Because you and your just as ****** ilk has no response.

[aboutfkntime]

No idiot. I know that sarcasm and logic eludes you, but since you like to judge a fight on facial damage, Canelo's fight against Jacobs must have been a draw, right? Whereas GGG clearly beat Jacobs, the Canelo Jacobs fight must have been a draw.

oh, you were being sarcastic ?

good to know

now I do not need to respond to the rest of that dribbley excuse-filled post

[stealthradon]

what..... did..... you..... just..... say..... ?

did you say that facial damage is the #1 scoring criteria..... ?

do I need to post a pic of Golovkin after the Canelo rematch..... ?

careful

No idiot. I know that sarcasm and logic eludes you, but since you like to judge a fight on facial damage, Canelo's fight against Jacobs must have been a draw, right? Whereas GGG clearly beat Jacobs, the Canelo Jacobs fight must have been a draw.

[aboutfkntime]

Golovkin's legacy, in 20 years.....

boxing fan 1: hey, remember that Borat guy, the middleweight

boxing fan 2: who ?

boxing fan 1: you know, that guy..... Golovkin

boxing fan 2: nope

boxing fan 1: you know, the foreign guy everyone made fun of

boxing fan 2: nope, who'd he beat ?

boxing fan 1: ummm, not sure..... nobody really

boxing fan 2: nope, don't remember him

boxing fan 1: hey, remember that guy Broner...... he was a good fighter, funny too

boxing fan 2: yea, I remember him..... funny dude, good fighter

[aboutfkntime]

Yeah he has about 10+ good wins imo...and 5-6 'great' wins if you want to term it that...great fighter, great career...an ATG at MW...that's pretty clear I think.

in a thread titled.....

" Why does GGG always get credit for imaginary wins??? "

you were ****** enough to post that G has " 5-6 'great' wins ".....

but you were then completely unable to even name 1 of these..... "great" wins LMAO

how fkn ironic is that ?

what is more ironic.....

you, providing a PERFECT demonstration why Golovkin's idiot fanbase give him credit for imaginary wins.....

or, you..... misquoting Steve Weisfeld to favor Golovkin, but being completely unaware that he judged the fight? loooool

oh lordie LMAO

please..... make my day by explaining why you think that Murray, Lemieux, and Monroe..... were better wins for Hypekin..... then Lara, Cotto, and Trout were..... for Canelo

then, you can make my year by explaining why you think that Bika, Barrera, and Miranda..... are as good as Andre Ward lol

you dribbling spastic casual-fan idiot

[aboutfkntime]

Guess who has
1) A permanent stain on his record for drug use
2) Multiple broken weight clauses
3) Multiple questionable decisions
4) The most díckloving fanbase in all of boxing, who can't tell a fight
5) No balls
6) A draw against Jacobs, because neither had any damage to the face.
7) A draw against Jorge Juarez
8) A gift decision against a 5-17
9) Zero clear wins against anyone below the age of 35, in his own weight class and active fighters. ZERO. The exact same number of times you have had sex with humans.

what..... did..... you..... just..... say..... ?

did you say that facial damage is the #1 scoring criteria..... ?

do I need to post a pic of Golovkin after the Canelo rematch..... ?

careful

[stealthradon]

spot quiz:

guess who has.....

1) no titles
2) no chance of breaking Hopkins record
3) no signature win on his resume'
4) no 365m deal with DAZN
5) no pride
6) egg on his face
7) lumps on his face
8) the shlttiest fanbase in all of boxing

Guess who has
1) A permanent stain on his record for drug use
2) Multiple broken weight clauses
3) Multiple questionable decisions
4) The most díckloving fanbase in all of boxing, who can't tell a fight
5) No balls
6) A draw against Jacobs, because neither had any damage to the face.
7) A draw against Jorge Juarez
8) A gift decision against a 5-17
9) Zero clear wins against anyone below the age of 35, in his own weight class and active fighters. ZERO. The exact same number of times you have had sex with humans.