Why does GGG always get credit for imaginary wins???
Collapse
-
-
To be fair GGG really did win the first fight with Canelo. I thought he lost the second one but he def won the first one. Not super big fan of either but it wouldn’t be right to act like that didn’t happenComment
-
GGG resume ain’t bad. Ppl trolling
GGG resume like RJJ. They was KO’ng MF’ers out. Available opponents perhaps weren’t it’s best but s*** I give both credit. Perhaps they had power and made it look easyComment
-
on the other thread..... Boxing1013 just stated that he does not see any real difference between Golovkin beating Murray and Lemieux, and Canelo beating Cotto and Lara
then..... he said that some of the killers on Golovkin's resume could have beaten Canelo..... but he will not name which one
GGG beat Lemieux and Murray at 160lbs. At 160 lbs the Murray who GGG beat would have beaten Cotto and stunk the place out as bad as Canelo did against Lara.Comment
-
What's hilarious is it's not just Golovkin they give his opponents credit for imaginary wins.
Canelo beat Cotto - by the skin of his teeth - because he was 20lb bigger than him in the ring. He beat Lara because Lara is a runner, not a fighter.
GGG beat Lemieux and Murray at 160lbs. At 160 lbs the Murray who GGG beat would have beaten Cotto and stunk the place out as bad as Canelo did against Lara.Comment
-
A record 20 successful middleweight title defenses in a row and 22 KOs in a row is an excellent record. Nobody fighting today can match it in any weight class. He knocked out Lemieux,Macklin, Murray, Geale, and many other guys rated top 10 by ring at the time he fought them. Haters like you turn these top 10 world rated challengers into bums as soon as he knocks them out. Your favorite Canelo does not have such a great record. He had a couple of good wins as 154 pound champ and a lot of cherry picks far worse than the worse guy GGG ever fought as middleweight champion. He won the title by beating Hatton's lousy brother, a welterweight at a catch weight, He cherry picked unranked little guys like Gomez and Lopez and defended against old welterweight Mosley. Yet you go on and on about Canelo's great resume while calling GGG's resume garbage. You are bias as hell and it shows. No matter who GGG beats you give him zero credit. GGG beats Jacobs and gets no credit. Canelo fights Jacobs later and he is this fearless warrior for doing what GGG already did. What a bunch of BS.Comment
-
A record 20 successful middleweight title defenses in a row and 22 KOs in a row is an excellent record. Nobody fighting today can match it in any weight class. He knocked out Lemieux,Macklin, Murray, Geale, and many other guys rated top 10 by ring at the time he fought them. Haters like you turn these top 10 world rated challengers into bums as soon as he knocks them out. Your favorite Canelo does not have such a great record. He had a couple of good wins as 154 pound champ and a lot of cherry picks far worse than the worse guy GGG ever fought as middleweight champion. He won the title by beating Hatton's lousy brother, a welterweight at a catch weight, He cherry picked unranked little guys like Gomez and Lopez and defended against old welterweight Mosley. Yet you go on and on about Canelo's great resume while calling GGG's resume garbage. You are bias as hell and it shows. No matter who GGG beats you give him zero credit. GGG beats Jacobs and gets no credit. Canelo fights Jacobs later and he is this fearless warrior for doing what GGG already did. What a bunch of BS.Comment
-
Why doesn't Alvarez get more credit for moving up to fight Fielding? Sure Rocky was unknown and a +800 underdog, but the dude was tall.
Same thing goes for Chavez Jr. Damm Jr had fought as high as 175lbs. Yeah people say he looked dead at 164, but he still had that big frame.
Saul just don't get no credit for taking those big risks.Comment
Comment