Why does GGG always get credit for imaginary wins???

[mcdonalds]

Whenever the topic of his weak resume comes up you have people who always make excuses and say bu but but he would've beat those guys anyway!!! The most special of geetards try to compare his resume to the great Canelo, saying sht like "he would beat guys like trout, Lara and Cotto as well"

Ok? The G never fought them though so he can't get any credit for it on his weak ass resume. And of course a career 160 pounder In G would be favored over these smaller men.

Get a grip. In a geetards mind he also has imaginary wins over Martinez , Sturm, froch, etc

[Thuglife Nelo]

in before boliodogs!

[strykr619]

Whenever the topic of his weak resume comes up you have people who always make excuses and say bu but but he would've beat those guys anyway!!! The most special of geetards try to compare his resume to the great Canelo, saying sht like "he would beat guys like trout, Lara and Cotto as well"

Ok? The G never fought them though so he can't get any credit for it on his weak ass resume. And of course a career 160 pounder In G would be favored over these smaller men.

Get a grip. In a geetards mind he also has imaginary wins over Martinez , Sturm, froch, etc

Oh look another fan PEDnelo....

[TonyGe]

Whenever the topic of his weak resume comes up you have people who always make excuses and say bu but but he would've beat those guys anyway!!! The most special of geetards try to compare his resume to the great Canelo, saying sht like "he would beat guys like trout, Lara and Cotto as well"

Ok? The G never fought them though so he can't get any credit for it on his weak ass resume. And of course a career 160 pounder In G would be favored over these smaller men.

Get a grip. In a geetards mind he also has imaginary wins over Martinez , Sturm, froch, etc

On the flip side why do some people claim Canelo would beat everyone on Golovkin's resume ? Because they are fans of Canelo and the other group are fans of Golovkin. Nobody knows unless it actually happens. Just ask Joshua how that works.

[Robbie Barrett]

On the flip side why do some people claim Canelo would beat everyone on Golovkin's resume ? Because they are fans of Canelo and the other group are fans of Golovkin. Nobody knows unless it actually happens. Just ask Joshua how that works.

Because Golovkins resume is garbage.

[_Maxi]

Wow, they let you out of prison? It's been like a month.

[aboutfkntime]

Whenever the topic of his weak resume comes up you have people who always make excuses and say bu but but he would've beat those guys anyway!!! The most special of geetards try to compare his resume to the great Canelo, saying sht like "he would beat guys like trout, Lara and Cotto as well"

Ok? The G never fought them though so he can't get any credit for it on his weak ass resume. And of course a career 160 pounder In G would be favored over these smaller men.

Get a grip. In a geetards mind he also has imaginary wins over Martinez , Sturm, froch, etc

on the other thread..... Boxing1013 just stated that he does not see any real difference between Golovkin beating Murray and Lemieux, and Canelo beating Cotto and Lara

then..... he said that some of the killers on Golovkin's resume could have beaten Canelo..... but he will not name which one

[Larry the boss]

Because his resume is trash

[TonyGe]

Because Golovkins resume is garbage.

Because Canelos resume is garbage also.

[boliodogs]

in before boliodogs!

Of course you are the first one in you ******ed ass hole. In to join the equally ******ed ass hole, Flagboy in a GGG hate fest. I don't know which of you red mfs is the worst GGG hater and biggest Canelo lover.