Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: IBF Could Strip Canelo; Order Golovkin-Derevyanchenko For Title

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #81
    Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
    you are applauding the principle, but ignoring the result

    they have now fragmented TWO divisions, heavyweight and middleweight..... both of those decisions resulting in a shlt fight, and both of those decisions likely resulting in a guy who was NOT the best fighter in his division being crowned as champion

    their rankings are SHlT !!..... until they fix that problem, their mandatories are simply toxic for boxing

    nobody in their right mind could possibly suggest that forcing a Canelo/Derevyanchenko mandatory NOW is in the best interests of boxing..... far from it, that decision is CLEARLY blocking a unification matchup that would determine the undisputed middleweight champion of the world

    it is total insanity, the IBF are shooting boxing in the foot because of their total inability to make a common-sense decision

    this is what the IBF achieved.....

    FACT: everyone is talking about who Canelo's next opponent will be, it has been the talk of boxingscene for the last 2 weeks..... well, guess what..... Derevyanchenko was not mentioned ONCE

    so this is the effect that decision will have on boxing/fans

    all of the good fights that have been mentioned so far, just got killed by the IBF..... and the IBF now pushed themselves onto the world-stage to make the following earth-shattering announcement..... that they think Derevyancehnko is the best middleweight in the planet loooool

    congratulations IBF..... they look dumb as fcuk to me..... they are like casual-fans sitting on the outside looking in, without really having a clue what is happening

    sorry bro, but I couldn't disagree more..... the IBF are fkn awful, and easily the worst sanctioning body

    just like in business, and in life..... you have to get EVERYTHING right, period..... if you fall short in that regard, you often fail..... just like the IBF did

    they have simply got to fix their truly dreadful rankings


    1 > DEREVYANCHENKO
    2 > VACANT
    3 > GOLOVKIN
    4 > SZEREMETA
    5 > JACOBS
    6 > WOJCICKI
    7 > FALCAO
    8 > CULCAY
    9 > BUTLER
    10 > VOLNY
    11 > NURSULTANOV
    12 > RADOVAN
    13 > KEELER
    14 > QUIGLEY
    15 > FOX

    no Andrade, no Charlo, no Brant, no Lemieux.....

    ranking Derevy ahead of Jacobs, despite the fact Jacobs just beat him..... ranking Derevy ahead of Golovkin..... ranking Szeremeta ahead of Jacobs.....

    no decision made by an organisation with rankings like that could possibly have a positive effect on boxing..... they are literally unqualified to comment

    lets put this into perspective..... DAZN, refusing to approve a middleweight unification undisputed title fight..... is only the second stupidest thing that happened within boxing this week

    IBF and DAZN are a fkn disgrace

    Canelo should drop both of them and fight Andrade, I am 100% positive that DAZN refusing to approve an undisputed unification title-fight is a breach of their contract with Canelo

    Canelo should start mentioning lawyers, and we will see how many seconds it takes DAZN to approve Andrade..... they would likely approve Andrade just to retain Canelo and avoid the bad publicity
    Charlo, Andrade, Brant wouldn't be in their rankings cos they hold belts under different orgs you fool. Lemieux is moving to super middleweight. Derevyanchenko is #1 because he fought a mandatory eliminator against a tough and game Jack Culcay. Stop complaining, the IBF is the only somewhat respectable sanctioning body.

    Comment


    • #82
      Originally posted by BoloShot View Post
      Charlo, Andrade, Brant wouldn't be in their rankings cos they hold belts under different orgs you fool. Lemieux is moving to super middleweight. Derevyanchenko is #1 because he fought a mandatory eliminator against a tough and game Jack Culcay. Stop complaining, the IBF is the only somewhat respectable sanctioning body.
      (I don't have anything against IBF)...

      ... but the biggest flaw of all those "sanctioning bodies" is that the don't rank at all the belt holders in "other orgs"... which is absolutely stupid...

      Comment


      • #83
        Originally posted by MDPopescu View Post
        (I don't have anything against IBF)...

        ... but the biggest flaw of all those "sanctioning bodies" is that the don't rank at all the belt holders in "other orgs"... which is absolutely stupid...
        Yeah that's a problem they all share so there can be loads done for that but I reckon they don't want to have to try and rank other belt holders lower than they'd like as it doesn't suit the endless platitudes required to grease up boxing politicians.

        Comment


        • #84
          Originally posted by BoloShot View Post
          Charlo, Andrade, Brant wouldn't be in their rankings cos they hold belts under different orgs you fool. Lemieux is moving to super middleweight. Derevyanchenko is #1 because he fought a mandatory eliminator against a tough and game Jack Culcay. Stop complaining, the IBF is the only somewhat respectable sanctioning body.



          well.... that sure does sound like a legit way to have the best fighters in the world competing for your title..... doesn't it?

          Comment


          • #85
            Originally posted by BoloShot View Post
            Yeah that's a problem they all share so there can be loads done for that but I reckon they don't want to have to try and rank other belt holders lower than they'd like as it doesn't suit the endless platitudes required to grease up boxing politicians.



            but, you said the IBF were... " somewhat respectable " ?

            kidding, I know what you mean

            like MDPopescu said..... if you do not rank the best fighters in the world, then ordering a mandatory is highly unlikely to be the best outcome for boxing

            Comment


            • #86
              Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
              well.... that sure does sound like a legit way to have the best fighters in the world competing for your title..... doesn't it?
              Promoters will always opt for titles they can manipulate

              Plus, fighting for the WBA/WBC/WBO doesn’t require the same day weigh in.

              If they started ranking other champions, and champions don’t fight for the vacant IBF belt for reasons outlined above, it would make the IBF look second rate. Unfortunately, until we rid the world of the WBA/WBC/WBO, the IBF rankings will suffer

              Comment


              • #87
                Originally posted by techliam View Post
                Promoters will always opt for titles they can manipulate

                Plus, fighting for the WBA/WBC/WBO doesn’t require the same day weigh in.

                If they started ranking other champions, and champions don’t fight for the vacant IBF belt for reasons outlined above, it would make the IBF look second rate. Unfortunately, until we rid the world of the WBA/WBC/WBO, the IBF rankings will suffer


                Canelo will vacate

                the IBF will order Golovkin/Derevyanchenko

                Golovkin will win

                the IBF will order Golovkin/Szeremeta..... (a real guy, ranked right behind Golovkin)

                Golovkin will vacate

                * sigh *

                Comment


                • #88
                  Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
                  but, you said the IBF were... " somewhat respectable " ?

                  kidding, I know what you mean

                  like MDPopescu said..... if you do not rank the best fighters in the world, then ordering a mandatory is highly unlikely to be the best outcome for boxing
                  Hell they would if they could but the legal precedent would be too much to handle. You basically need the IBF to become the one legit belt to allow it to become the best beyond a doubt.

                  Comment


                  • #89
                    Originally posted by BoloShot View Post
                    Hell they would if they could but the legal precedent would be too much to handle. You basically need the IBF to become the one legit belt to allow it to become the best beyond a doubt.


                    but, they can't..... so, they shouldn't

                    ordering Canelo/Derevyanchenko killed MUCH better fights

                    they are the little engine that could..... except, they can't

                    if you have nothing good to say, then keep your mouth shut

                    it is better to keep your mouth shut, at the risk of looking like a fool..... rather than opening it, and removing all doubt

                    the IBF look like fools, stepping in the way of Canelo/Golovkin, Andrade, Charlo, Smith, Kovalev..... to insist that Derevyanchenko is a better opponent

                    Comment


                    • #90
                      Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
                      but, they can't..... so, they shouldn't

                      ordering Canelo/Derevyanchenko killed MUCH better fights

                      they are the little engine that could..... except, they can't




                      the IBF look like fools, stepping in the way of Canelo/Golovkin, Andrade, Charlo, Smith, Kovalev..... to insist that Derevyanchenko is a better opponent
                      You do realise that unifications are given more precedence ahead of mandatory duties? Derev is #1 contender with them, they're not saying he's the best MW around, their champ is.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP