Comments Thread For: Andrade: GGG Beat #81 in The World Rolls, I'm Fighting Real Guys!

[j.razor]

Gotta love the dudes who sit there and call fighters *******. Such ***** boys.

When they pay to see the match ups they want & don't get them then its okay for them to talk shet. Fvk Pvssy G!

[Dontbeahater]

Thing is though...how many wins against HOFs in their prime, at their preferred weight, does anyone have on their resume?...just hardly ever happens ya know.

I mean GGG pretty clearly beat Canelo twice (when you outland a guy 10/11 rounds (1 tie) and 8/11 rounds (1 tie) that usually tells the story...and he doesn't really get anything but criticism for those fights and the Jacobs fight, which was pretty straightforward as well (9/11 rounds, 1 tie).

Just seems like if people aren't going to give him credit where he clearly deserves it, they will probably overlook other positives about him as well...just seems as though many on here have a blind spot for GGG and find it hard to really give him some credit.

So yeah no real HOFs in their prime for GGG (other than Canelo which again I think people should credit him for but they seem to not want to...and again if the criteria for getting an acknowledged win is a KO...then a good win would never happen ya know).

But GGG does have about 15 good fighters, all in their prime, all at their best weight or close to it (Brook a notable exception) who he dominated and KOed...that's really impressive actually...better imo than a Canelo 12 round decision against Mosley at 152 or Cotto at 155 ya know...Idk I just don't really see the over the top stuff about GGG's resume

Murray, Macklin, Geale, Rosado, Stevens, Ouma, Brook, Monroe, Vanes, Rolls, Ishida, Adama, Lemieux, Rubio, Proksa...15 guys all by KO, all solid enough, all in their prime basically...idk I just feel like if the dude was a bum it would have been exposed in way greater detail than it has been lol...like one of those dudes would have gone 12 with him or maybe even beaten him one night...just think he deserves a lot more credit...when you factor in the amateur career it is pretty clear he is the real deal

Again name one top p4p fighter or even elite fighter!?!?

We are all still waiting for you to " get started"

The best part is that even when ggg fought those "top fighters" everyone said they were tomato cans! So you cant even say they were top when they fought ggg.
Murray?
Maklin?
Adama?
ETC.

All gatekeepers or journey men.
You should remember that passing your opinion as FACTS doesn't make your opinion FACTS.

Ggg never beat anyone p4p - FACTS
Ggg never moved up or down in weight (except for rolls!) but had fighters move up or down for him - FACTS

Ggg own trainer is exposing him now and here you are fighting your hardest to defend a good but not great hype job.
Did you really think ggg was comparable to Tyson? Floyd? Manny? Hagler? Rjj? Hopkins? Or even CANELO? or even WARD? or even COTTO imho?

Sorry! history is screaming that you are wrong. Ggg can still turn it around if he fights and beats someone who isn't a huge underdog against him even look at Vegas odds for any ggg fight. Smart money always had crazy one sided odds on ggg except for Canelo 2!

Are you going to now claim ggg is rich so why does he care? Yes. Canelo made him rich and I'm happy for ggg. Doesn't mean he is what you hope is he is.

[SchoolTheseCats]

Thing is though...how many wins against HOFs in their prime, at their preferred weight, does anyone have on their resume?...just hardly ever happens ya know.

I mean GGG pretty clearly beat Canelo twice (when you outland a guy 10/11 rounds (1 tie) and 8/11 rounds (1 tie) that usually tells the story...and he doesn't really get anything but criticism for those fights and the Jacobs fight, which was pretty straightforward as well (9/11 rounds, 1 tie).

Just seems like if people aren't going to give him credit where he clearly deserves it, they will probably overlook other positives about him as well...just seems as though many on here have a blind spot for GGG and find it hard to really give him some credit.

So yeah no real HOFs in their prime for GGG (other than Canelo which again I think people should credit him for but they seem to not want to...and again if the criteria for getting an acknowledged win is a KO...then a good win would never happen ya know).

But GGG does have about 15 good fighters, all in their prime, all at their best weight or close to it (Brook a notable exception) who he dominated and KOed...that's really impressive actually...better imo than a Canelo 12 round decision against Mosley at 152 or Cotto at 155 ya know...Idk I just don't really see the over the top stuff about GGG's resume

Murray, Macklin, Geale, Rosado, Stevens, Ouma, Brook, Monroe, Vanes, Rolls, Ishida, Adama, Lemieux, Rubio, Proksa...15 guys all by KO, all solid enough, all in their prime basically...idk I just feel like if the dude was a bum it would have been exposed in way greater detail than it has been lol...like one of those dudes would have gone 12 with him or maybe even beaten him one night...just think he deserves a lot more credit...when you factor in the amateur career it is pretty clear he is the real deal

Everyone you named doesn’t even crack top 20 p4p list... the first canelo fight I scored for triple G, second canelo took it to him had him trying fight off the back foot after all that Mexican style talk and broke his face. Point is that a lot of people are making you lost second fight did absolutely nothing in your return to warrant a immediate shot at canelo next, we already saw that fight twice... I personally would rather see a undisputed fight next for canelo or smith at 168lbs next not triple G with his whining ways and fighting crappy opponents like before until he cashes in again

[j.razor]

GGG’s resume far surpasses Andrade’s whichever way people wanna spin it.

Andrade’s last 5
Akavov
Katundowka
Fox
Culcay
Nelson

GGG’s last 5
Rolls
Canelo
Martirosyan
Canelo
Jacobs

It’s pretty obvious who’s been fighting the “real guys”.

So why is Sissy G & his fans afraid of Boo Boo? You KNOW why! Cuz they don't want Sissy G to get his ASS kicked!

[j.razor]

your best win is against vanes in a sd. Stop it boy.

Boo Boo whoops Sissy G, stop it shorty.

[j.razor]

Originally Posted by Sweet_Science2
They looked good. Jacobs clearly outboxed and beat lil g. And Canelo beat the shyt out of lil g in the second way more convincingly.

Beat lil g Mexican Style all fight. Had his face looking like Beanie man.

Bro...how can you say a guy clearly got outboxed or beat up when he outlanded the opponent in 27/33 (3 ties) of the rounds he boxed against those guys lol, and even the people who really don't like him acknowledge that he is a big puncher, so he was definitely winning a lot of those rounds...I mean I get it if some people just don't like him but some of the narratives out there about him are a little strange honestly.

He wasn't wrong.

[j.razor]

Thing is though...how many wins against HOFs in their prime, at their preferred weight, does anyone have on their resume?...just hardly ever happens ya know.

I mean GGG pretty clearly beat Canelo twice (when you outland a guy 10/11 rounds (1 tie) and 8/11 rounds (1 tie) that usually tells the story...and he doesn't really get anything but criticism for those fights and the Jacobs fight, which was pretty straightforward as well (9/11 rounds, 1 tie).

Just seems like if people aren't going to give him credit where he clearly deserves it, they will probably overlook other positives about him as well...just seems as though many on here have a blind spot for GGG and find it hard to really give him some credit.

So yeah no real HOFs in their prime for GGG (other than Canelo which again I think people should credit him for but they seem to not want to...and again if the criteria for getting an acknowledged win is a KO...then a good win would never happen ya know).

But GGG does have about 15 good fighters, all in their prime, all at their best weight or close to it (Brook a notable exception) who he dominated and KOed...that's really impressive actually...better imo than a Canelo 12 round decision against Mosley at 152 or Cotto at 155 ya know...Idk I just don't really see the over the top stuff about GGG's resume

Murray, Macklin, Geale, Rosado, Stevens, Ouma, Brook, Monroe, Vanes, Rolls, Ishida, Adama, Lemieux, Rubio, Proksa...15 guys all by KO, all solid enough, all in their prime basically...idk I just feel like if the dude was a bum it would have been exposed in way greater detail than it has been lol...like one of those dudes would have gone 12 with him or maybe even beaten him one night...just think he deserves a lot more credit...when you factor in the amateur career it is pretty clear he is the real deal

Stop the dumb shet. Sissy G didn't land shet. You need to do your homework..

[j.razor]

Man in all my years scoring boxing I have just honestly never really seen pretty clear decisions not get shaded pretty universally to the guy who was doing the things GGG was doing in there...punch impact matters as well, this is true...but when you punch as well and precise as GGG does, and have all that activity it just leads to a lot of clear rounds for him and a lot of close rounds otherwise.

All I can say is if Jacobs and Canelo fought the fight GGG did, and vice versa, I would have the same scores? Idk if that helps lol...I just don't really think those fights were really that hard to judge and were pretty straightforward...and if dudes can't really give him credit for those wins it's hard to ever see him getting credit from them if he ever goes 12 rounds lol.

As an example you could have a fight where one guy wins 5 clear rounds...the other guy 0...but someone could say fighter A only had 3 clear rounds and the other guy had 3 as well...and then split the other close rounds 5-1 lol...idk man I just think when two men step in the ring they deserve to be treated fairly and I don't see a favorite when I go in the ring...I'm just scoring the action.

In a 12 round fight it will always be very hard for one fighter to convincingly win at least 7 rounds, to the point where even the detractors of that fighter acknowledge he won...at the top level when it goes 12 rounds there are obviously some close rounds in there almost certainly...but yeah looking at punch impact and punches landed I just don't really see the hate for GGG on those 3 fights...some people not giving him any credit for stuff like that just makes any valid criticism of him fall a little flat imo.

Oh well, agree to disagree I guess lol.

AND YOU STILL can't score for shet! Who the fvk are you harold ledderman?!?!

[j.razor]

Andrade will lose against Sulecki.

Bet you he won't.

[j.razor]

Obsessed...

Exposing Sissy G