Anyone that considering him a world champion at 154 should be legally banned from watching boxing imo
Can you really consider Pacquiao a 8 division champ when he never........
Collapse
-
This is a bigger question then just Pacquiao. He is technically an 8 division champ. If you think otherwise then that’s fine but then you have to say that no one is champion except the number one person in the division.Comment
-
He has.more belts in weights, be it 6,7 or 8 who Is counting than anyone in history. Step up to plate like he did rather than begrudge him.
Is Floyd really unbeaten you might as well ask.Comment
-
Not every champion is the best/number one champion nowadays. i.e. If one beats Errol Spence or Shawn Porter for a welterweight championship that means technically you still beat a welterweight champ even though the best/number one welterweight champ is still Terrence Crawford or maybe to the minority, Keith Thurman who has the best resume of all the welterweights in the current generation. You beat a champ you become a champ.
If you want a more streamlined version of champions, you may opt for the people's champion like lineal champions. I think this is more inline with your idea of a champion. i.e. if the idea of Manny's 8 division championship is not your cup of tea you can then opt for Pacquiao's 5 lineal championships--So you strip him of the 3 other ones in your own personal list. Anyhow that's how I see it.Comment
-
Can you really consider him a 8 division champ when he never beat the top guy at 135, 147 and 154?Comment
-
Comment
-
-
Comment
Comment