Originally posted by bigdunny1
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Canelo-Derevyanchenko Mandatory Formally Ordered By IBF
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Eff Pandas View PostF#ck ABC Groups always f#cking sh^t up.
Why is a guy who lost to the guy who just got beat by Canelo a f#cking mando? The Culcay W?!?!?! Man gtfo here with that sh^t that don't make no sense.
Well Canelo gots a easy W next time out unless he surprises me & drops his belt & this pushes back any fight people are excited for or that could be competitive out til May 2020.
Not that Canelo dropped a belt for a bigger, worth more money, more of a challenge type fight, but he has seemed to be steering strongly towards getting that undisputed 160 thing on his resume as dumb & who gives a f#ck-ish I personally am about that stuff these days with these corrupt ass ABC Groups.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bigdunny1 View PostIBF has some crazy rules how do you become a mandatory and get a orded title shot and lose and then almost 6 months later you are now the mandatory and being order again for another title shot so phuking soon?
He just lost his title shot to Jacobs back in like November. WTF
Derev fought Jacobs hard and then he fought another htough fight against #1 IBF so this is how he became mandatory again and want a 3rd tough fight in a row.
Originally posted by Worick View PostLmao remember the hype for dervychenko? **** disappeared after jacobs whooped him
Comment
-
Originally posted by Blueboy3 View PostYou fans are so ****** I swear, IBF is pushing Canelo to fight Andrade or a top 10 MW and you fans are pissed at the IBF lol. oh yeah lets see GGG/Canelo for the 8th time. Maybe if Charlo was smart enough he could've fought for the IBF and got his shot quickly, hell D.chenko is with the PBC, he could've fought him to take his place in the IBF.
How many belt fights we gonna give him?
Why you calling me ****** over some ****** ABC sh^t when you gotta know this don't make much f#cking sense if boxing made sense?
Why wouldn't people rather see hell 5 or 6 other fights more than a guy who just lost a belt fight?
Andrade makes more sense. A GGG trilogy fight makes more sense with how close those fights were. Mall makes more sense. If BJS has any intention of fighting 160 again he makes more sense. Sh^t man David L makes more sense if he can make 160 than a guy who just lost a belt fight. If I looked at the rankings I could probably come with a lot more guys.
F#ck these goofy ass ABC rankings & bs mandos that don't make no sense.
I just wanna see the best guys fight the best contenders & I don't deny Derevyanchenko is a top contender, but he's not mando worthy lets be f#cking serious here man. You're f#cking ******ed if you think Derevyanchenko is mando worthy in a boxing world that makes sense. Granted we all know boxing is on some bizarro sh^t at all times, but thats not gonna stop me & others from b^tching about the dumb sh^t that silly mfers act like is okay either.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bigdunny1 View Postthis ^^^^ I see no reason for the IBF mandating this pointless fight. Lou must be dropping some serious coin to get this ordered right now. There is already like half a dozen better fighters all in front of the line for that Canelo lottery ticket and they come out of left field with this garbage. If you don't get it by now these belt orgs don't want 1 fighter champ of all the belts. Much better for their pockets to extort 4 and in the WBA case 5 different fighters for sanction fees and create chaos with the belts.
And I do think the IBF is THAT ABC Group with these dumb ass aggressive mando's. I believe Spence has had 1 or 2 of these dumb ass mando's & plenty other guys have also. Its a IBF thing.
To some extant I like that the IBF pushes their mando's hard, unlike any other ABC Group, but the problem is they are dumb ass f#cking mando's more often then not.
I love the concept of a mando. Problem is when the rankings make no damn sense that drastically diminishes the appeal of pushing these mando's so hard that aren't reallllllllllly deserving.
I mean is anyone legit feeling that a Culcay W should get you a belt fight? Realllllllllly? If so did you get brain damaged in your moms ***** or as a child or something? Maybe get into a motorcycle accident in your 20's? Its f#cking ****** sh^t.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Eff Pandas View PostThis dude just lost a belt fight.
How many belt fights we gonna give him?
Why you calling me ****** over some ****** ABC sh^t when you gotta know this don't make much f#cking sense if boxing made sense?
Why wouldn't people rather see hell 5 or 6 other fights more than a guy who just lost a belt fight?
Andrade makes more sense. A GGG trilogy fight makes more sense with how close those fights were. Mall makes more sense. If BJS has any intention of fighting 160 again he makes more sense. Sh^t man David L makes more sense if he can make 160 than a guy who just lost a belt fight. If I looked at the rankings I could probably come with a lot more guys.
F#ck these goofy ass ABC rankings & bs mandos that don't make no sense.
I just wanna see the best guys fight the best contenders & I don't deny Derevyanchenko is a top contender, but he's not mando worthy lets be f#cking serious here man. You're f#cking ******ed if you think Derevyanchenko is mando worthy in a boxing world that makes sense. Granted we all know boxing is on some bizarro sh^t at all times, but thats not gonna stop me & others from b^tching about the dumb sh^t that silly mfers act like is okay either.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jab jab boom View Postyeah, he confirmed with me that he's in his 50s. Even more pathetic when you realize that this site is the highlight of his life. And... What kind of 50 yr old needs to post gifs like a 12 yr old female to get his point across?? Lol
Comment
-
Comment