I thought 4 million in America was good. But that's global? They really are hemorrhaging money.
DAZN has exceeded 4M subscribers
Collapse
-
-
Why would I, as an American, want to see American fighters getting less exposure than the last Easter/Bartholmey fight?
Can someone please explain to me why American fighters getting minimal exposure is good for American boxing? Especially when we have outlets currently that can give them 20x's the exposure they'll get on DAZN?Comment
-
Proud DAZN subscriber. Will stick with them til Canelo leaves.
What I like about DAZN is that they upload the fights right away, I couldn’t do that with HBO. Missed the Gallo Estrada fight last week, but when I got home at midnight, I was able to watch the full show. Now that is customer service.Comment
-
Thats world wide. I think you misunderstood what I did.I think you got your math f**ked up. 4 million subscribers at $9.99 would be about $40M, $80M if it’s $19.99. That’s a month. For a year that’s $480M to $960M. We don’t know if people paid $9.99, $19.99 or $99.99 so what DAZN is pulling in a year could be anywhere between those numbers.
I was taking the avg 400k per the 10 countries they are in & putting it in US revenue based on $100/yr to $240/yr at $20/mo based on their current price options offered. Than I compared it to what I know of the US deal with Canelo.
Like I said it does get more complicated when you consider that Canelo/GBP isn't a US product alone so the $365M expense isn't just taking in money on DAZN's side from US revenue. Its taking in revenue from other countries too. Only DAZN knows for sure how much any particular thing they put on is realllllly bringing in based on how much people are paying to watch worldwide for that content vs what they payed.Comment
-
This is possible. They need to pick up content that will bring those subscribers.... Like football.Comment
-
Comment
-
-
Comment
Comment