Comments Thread For: Arum: Joshua Should Sign With Top Rank, Nobody Has DAZN!

[Stinger1]

u Forgot José Ramírez oscar Valdez Rob Brant miguel berchelt, Navarrete, ancajas, etc. He’s got champs from al over the globe. Not just Eastern euros.

All at lower weights which most people don't care about. Even some hardcore boxing fans won't watch a fights below lightweight.

[DougalDylan]

The math says DAZN is the better option unless Wilder is willing to change his second name to Mayweather.

Wilder thought him and Fury would do 2.5 million pay per views ...

Wilder's side is telling Wilder: the fight should be on the service that will pay the most.

Joshua's side is telling Joshua: the fight should be on the service that will pay the least.

[Oldskoolg]

Bob you best watch your back my ***ish brother, legions of Eddie Hearn uk fans just made you public enemy #1 in the council estates for 1, mentioning that no one here cares about dazn and 2, telling the truth about Joshua and Hearn.

[KTFOKING]

Right, so if one side is discouraging their fighter from maximizing revenue, that side deserves more of the blame.

Remember, Hearn has no fiduciary duty to Joshua. Hearn is a promoter. His job is to pay Joshua as little as possible to maximize his profit. He has no legal responsibility to give Joshua sound career advice. The fight being on DAZN is in Hearn's best interest regardless of whether it's in Joshua's best interest.

So you agree with me that no contractual stipulations will be holding up Wilder vs Joshua if they were to fight next, right?

[Toffee]

Right, so if one side is discouraging their fighter from maximizing revenue, that side deserves more of the blame.

Remember, Hearn has no fiduciary duty to Joshua. Hearn is a promoter. His job is to pay Joshua as little as possible to maximize his profit. He has no legal responsibility to give Joshua sound career advice. The fight being on DAZN is in Hearn's best interest regardless of whether it's in Joshua's best interest.

He has a commercial interest in maximising Joshua's income.

Because if he doesn't then he won't be Joshua's promoter any more.

Where are the boxers claiming Hearn has ripped them off?

[Robbie Barrett]

Bob you best watch your back my ***ish brother, legions of Eddie Hearn uk fans just made you public enemy #1 in the council estates for 1, mentioning that no one here cares about dazn and 2, telling the truth about Joshua and Hearn.

Watch his back? The UK isn't like an American hood where he'll get KO'd by a gang of animals and his shoes stolen.

[SchoolTheseCats]

Aj doesn’t need the US he will make truck loads of cash defending in front of huge crowds in the UK and an occasional US fight.Hes been making way larger purses and Wilder who’s been champ longer was making something like a million a fight.Aj doesn’t need the U S or wilder.Most people think Fury beat him and I will bet you Fury and AJ will hook up in a huge fight in the UK before Wilder fights either one of them.People praised Fury for taking the wilder fight after his long layoff and now they want to bash him because he’s making financial decisions that benefit him.He flat out beat Wilder on points.

Got it you want Joshua to be just like calzaghe

[N/A]

The math says DAZN is the better option

According to who?

[SchoolTheseCats]

u forget that Haymon and finkel brainwashed wilder into not going to DAZN. It was sweet Lou that took Wilder to the table.

Why take dazn exclusive deal with flat fees even if he wins first fight against Joshua still will only earn same as first fight

[N/A]

So you agree with me that no contractual stipulations will be holding up Wilder vs Joshua if they were to fight next, right?

There's no way for either one of us to know that. DAZN could have matching rights to Joshua's next fight. Showtime could have matching rights to Wilder's next fight.

Regardless of contractual stipulations, Hearn loses out on hundreds of millions of dollars if DAZN cuts ties with them. He has to keep them happy.