Comments Thread For: Arum: Joshua Should Sign With Top Rank, Nobody Has DAZN!

[Robbie Barrett]

Wilder's side is telling Wilder: the fight should be on the service that will pay the most.

Joshua's side is telling Joshua: the fight should be on the service that will pay the least.

The service that is paying Joshua 30 mil to fight Miller is the service that pays the least? ******ation at it's finest.


The "service that pays the least" was going to pay Wilder 20 mil for Breazeale.

Go away you clown. Why are you still here sucking off PBC and Wilder. You aren't even a fan of the sport, you're just ****ing weirdo.

[KTFOKING]

u forget that Haymon and finkel brainwashed wilder into not going to DAZN. It was sweet Lou that took Wilder to the table.

Once again, nothing Wilder has done prevents the Joshua fight. Neither are exclusive to a network. That fight could technically happen on DAZN or SHO PPV. Fury is the only one with an exclusive deal and a fight against him has to happen on ESPN or at the very least Co-PPV.

[Robbie Barrett]

Bob is right about AJ fighting on DAZN. The reason AJ is fighting in America is to build his profile here. Why put him on an app that has less subscribers than those who bought the Wilder-Fury PPV? That makes no sense. But it helps Hearn and that's why Bob said AJ is being misled by Hearn.

Pay your bet.........

[KTFOKING]

Wilder's side is telling Wilder: the fight should be on the service that will pay the most.

Joshua's side is telling Joshua: the fight should be on the service that will pay the least.

Don’t care what either teams are saying, neither are locked in a deal where that fight can't happen. That's the entire point here.

[Tyistall]

30 million to fight Miller and he's getting "used"?

[bballchump11]

Joshua's profile is being inhibited on DAZN.

[N/A]

Don’t care what either teams are saying, neither are locked in a deal where that fight can't happen. That's the entire point here.

Right, so if one side is discouraging their fighter from maximizing revenue, that side deserves more of the blame.

Remember, Hearn has no fiduciary duty to Joshua. Hearn is a promoter. His job is to pay Joshua as little as possible to maximize his profit. He has no legal responsibility to give Joshua sound career advice. The fight being on DAZN is in Hearn's best interest regardless of whether it's in Joshua's best interest.

[Boksfan]

Bob is right about AJ fighting on DAZN. The reason AJ is fighting in America is to build his profile here. Why put him on an app that has less subscribers than those who bought the Wilder-Fury PPV? That makes no sense. But it helps Hearn and that's why Bob said AJ is being misled by Hearn.

Nobody is being mislead, I'm sure Joshua is gladly promoting DZNUTS in US for 30 million dollar just like Canelo does. Now tell me Canelo is mislead by Oscar, I dare you.

[SchoolTheseCats]

If he really wants exposure can sign with fox who is carried by more homes then espn.... but no need to him and wilder can just sell they fights especially with each other to highest bidder

[Robbie Barrett]

Right, so if one side is discouraging their fighter from maximizing revenue, that side deserves more of the blame.

Remember, Hearn has no fiduciary duty to Joshua. Hearn is a promoter. His job is to pay Joshua as little as possible to maximize his profit. He has no legal responsibility to give Joshua sound career advice. The fight being on DAZN is in Hearn's best interest regardless of whether it's in Joshua's best interest.

You just literally described Haymon. I'd say having Wilder walk away from fighting Breazeale for 20 mil to fight him for 3 mil on regular Showtime is discouraging their fighter from maximizing revenue.