Any AJ fanboy here willing to admit that they undersold Wilder?

[Robbie Barrett]

BULLSHlT !!

long BEFORE the Fury fight, on Mon Oct 22, 2018..... Hearn slipped up and admitted that Wilder was worth 35%.....

" At the moment I think a split of 65-35 in AJ’s favour is fair "

https://www.boxingscene.com/hearn-if-wilder-fury-1-million-buys-ill-give-wilder-50-50--133005

so who is mixing up facts and timelines ?

if Hearn knew that " a split of 65-35 in AJ’s favour is fair "..... then those earlier offers were blatant lowballs.....

you fanboy gimps got exposed, by the very clowns you are protecting

which is yea..... funny

grow up, and have the common-decency, let alone the common-sense..... to admit that Eddie Hearn knows more about this subject than you do lol

forget the proof that I just posted..... the tiniest bit of common-sense would tell you that 15mil is a lowball

the tiniest bit of common-sense would also tell you that when Wilder bet on himself by accepting their 15mil lowball..... it was clearly obvious that one guy wanted that fight and one guy did not

No it doesn't. If he believes 20%, 25%, 30% is fair to Wilder then he'll believe 35% is fair to Wilder too. Doesn't mean the other offers were lowball at all. Wilder made 7 mil against Fury and is now back on regular Showtime, but $15 mil is lowball? Yeah right.

[aboutfkntime]

long before is 1 month?

I said after the Fury fight he said 40% or more.

Stop lying please.

FACT: BEFORE the Fury fight, Hearn admitted that Wilder is worth 35%

FACT: TODAY, you insist that Wilder should have accepted 12m

what was that point you were making about dates, timelines, and facts?

[aboutfkntime]

No it doesn't. If he believes 20%, 25%, 30% is fair to Wilder then he'll believe 35% is fair to Wilder too. Doesn't mean the other offers were lowball at all. Wilder made 7 mil against Fury and is now back on regular Showtime, but $15 mil is lowball? Yeah right.

OF COURSE that offer was a lowball

that is potentially a $100m fight

Team Bullshlt shat the bed when Wilder bet on himself by accepting that lowball..... which is funny as hell

but not as funny as their " lost my pen " excuses

[LacedUp]

FACT: BEFORE the Fury fight, Hearn admitted that Wilder is worth 35%

FACT: TODAY, you insist that Wilder should have accepted 12m

what was that point you were making about dates, timelines, and facts?

I don't think you understand the phrase "at the time". I didn't say he should have taken it, I don't think you read very well.

I said it would have been overpayment, which it would since it was 5x his best ever payday at the time.

I know this is hard for someone like you to grasp, but maybe it'll sink in one day.

[aboutfkntime]

I don't think you understand the phrase "at the time". I didn't say he should have taken it, I don't think you read very well.

I said it would have been overpayment, which it would since it was 5x his best ever payday at the time.

I know this is hard for someone like you to grasp, but maybe it'll sink in one day.

FACT: Hearn admitted that Wilder was worth 35%

so when you insist that 12mil would have been over-paying Wilder..... you expose yourself as an ignorant pom-pom waver

also.....

the ONLY relevant factors when considering a purse-split is..... the total revenue that the event will generate / how much each party brings to the table..... as proven by the fact that Hearn admitted Wilder is worth 35%.....

attempting to factor in the size of one of the parties highest previous purse is quite frankly, childish..... boxing, and life, does not work like that

[Robbie Barrett]

OF COURSE that offer was a lowball

that is potentially a $100m fight

Team Bullshlt shat the bed when Wilder bet on himself by accepting that lowball..... which is funny as hell

but not as funny as their " lost my pen " excuses

Again how is it a lowball when Wilder didn't even make half of that agains the second biggest draw in the division?

Wilder never signed the contract and stalled until Joshua had to accept Povetkin.


You're making excuses about money. Wilder just ran from a 100 mil deal to fight for 3 mil on Showtime. This isn't about money, he's flat out ducking.

[LacedUp]

FACT: Hearn admitted that Wilder was worth 35%

so when you insist that 12mil would have been over-paying Wilder..... you expose yourself as an ignorant pom-pom waver

also.....

the ONLY relevant factors when considering a purse-split is..... the total revenue that the event will generate / how much each party brings to the table..... as proven by the fact that Hearn admitted Wilder is worth 35%.....

attempting to factor in the size of one of the parties highest previous purse is quite frankly, childish..... boxing, and life, does not work like that

As I said, I can see when I debate with a fooking idiot and you are one of them.

[aboutfkntime]

As I said, I can see when I debate with a fooking idiot and you are one of them.

keep insisting that 12mil is overpaying Wilder..... despite the fact Hearn admitted that Wilder is worth 35%

[aboutfkntime]

why would you take it upon yourself to determine what a man is worth?

and when proven wrong..... why would you take it upon yourself to contradict the promoter of the guy you are defending?

[LacedUp]

keep insisting that 12mil is overpaying Wilder..... despite the fact Hearn admitted that Wilder is worth 35%

Yes you're mixing up timelines at your convenience.

If you were a normal intelligent human being, you wouldn't have to do that.

But you are because you're driving an agenda.