The point I was trying to make from the beginning is that there's no proof of any of these boxers doping. I said that to you a number of times. It was you that starting going with the, "Well, this means there is more proof this way." It's just not necessary. I definitely didn't say Pac was doping.
But you need to be real. It was supposed to be random testing. Pac countered that with needing 30 days to recover. A whole 30 days! That's insane. Then the compromises came. Pac wanted 24 days. Mayweather agreed to 14 days.
Now you tell me....why the actual fvvck would anyone need even 14 days to recover from blood testing. Does that make sense to you? Again, I'm not saying he was doping, but who is being reasonable here? 14 days was more than enough. Much more than enough, in fact, which is why Roach was saying the fight not happening was Pac's fault, I assume.
But you need to be real. It was supposed to be random testing. Pac countered that with needing 30 days to recover. A whole 30 days! That's insane. Then the compromises came. Pac wanted 24 days. Mayweather agreed to 14 days.
Now you tell me....why the actual fvvck would anyone need even 14 days to recover from blood testing. Does that make sense to you? Again, I'm not saying he was doping, but who is being reasonable here? 14 days was more than enough. Much more than enough, in fact, which is why Roach was saying the fight not happening was Pac's fault, I assume.
Comment