Do you make any positive threads? You seem like a pretty negative dude. Cheer up, there is good in this world
You need to understand the concept of Parody and ownership. Are SNAC guys cheaters? I say Jacobs, Mikey and Andrade are clean. Do I have a right to believe this or are they cheaters because they work with Conte? This is comparable standards not negativity.
floyd has been juicing way before ariza came along. but to answer your question, yes, he was. that explains the need for the IV.
How does that follow logic? Him juicing explains the need for an IV but he never needed an IV for juicing way before ariza???
Anything is possible, and anyone can accuse anyone of anything. The fact of the matter is none of the fighters mentioned here have popped for PED's. So until someone does, there is no proof, so who cares. Just enjoy the fights!
As a Floyd fan...Yes...it's very possible. For years, we heard Floyd insinuate that team Pacquiao was cheating. Next thing you know, Floyd has Ariza, along with Heredia who was making appearances around the Mayweather gym during Floyd's camp for the Pacquiao fight. So, Ariza was cheating when he was with Pacquiao but he suddenly stopped cheating when he was with Floyd?
This is why I hated that Floyd accepted Ariza into his camp. He saw what Ariza did for Maidana in the first fight then stole him from Maidana's camp. Maidana completely lost the intesity and stamina in the second fight without Ariza, and Floyd was bouncing on his toes like a teenager. I'm not such a F***o that I can accept that. Either Ariza helped BOTH of them cheat or neither of them.
How does that follow logic? Him juicing explains the need for an IV but he never needed an IV for juicing way before ariza???
Anything is possible, and anyone can accuse anyone of anything. The fact of the matter is none of the fighters mentioned here have popped for PED's. So until someone does, there is no proof, so who cares. Just enjoy the fights!
the same logic "pac's head grew" so he's juicing. i dont know about you, but if you take both of these to the court of law, i think the one who used the IV will be found guilty instead of the guy "who's head grew".
the same logic "pac's head grew" so he's juicing. i dont know about you, but if you take both of these to the court of law, i think the one who used the IV will be found guilty instead of the guy "who's head grew".
Neither would be found guilty in a court of law. That makes no sense.
What about the one who refused testing for 50% of the biggest fight in the world and has a shlt load of back acne?
Just stop it. It's ridiculous. An IV doesn't do what you think it does. It masks a urine test by dilution. The urine sample is required to be tested for dilution by two separate entity. That ends the IV discussion.
Comment