Comments Thread For: Fighter of The Decade? Mayweather, Ward Top List of Candidates

[THEFRESHBRAWLER]

Floyd has done it again lol. Pacquio fans must be sick but you can’t be fotd getting beat up and bullied by a Australian substitute teacher.

[THEFRESHBRAWLER]

So Mayweather and Ward don't count because they didnlt fight every year?

Well.......

Lomachenko didn't fight for 3 years of the decade = disqualified
Garcia didn't fight for 2 years of the decade = disqualified

Lmaooo green k.

[THEFRESHBRAWLER]

Meanwhile, we got Lomachenko tearing the divisions a new *******, making p4p fighters quit.

Lmaoooooo Lomachenko fans are delusional. You call getting dropped by Linares and going the distance with Pedraza tearing the division? He beat one p4p fighter who he made jump two weight classes

[THEFRESHBRAWLER]

All these candidates are pretty weak. Mayweather is the best fighter of half a decade, it's just too long to go without taking a risk and it's not like his wins are really impressive, he didnt move up beat a hagler or something. He beat old men and a child. Example, if rungvisai beats estrada in the rematch he'd have beaten prime p4p#1 chocolatito and estrda twice in near half a decade, that shts on mayweathers list of hasbeens.

Will have to wait for the end of the year. My thoughts are:

Lomachenko if he can get tanks btch ass in the ring and beat him.
Mikey garcia if he can beat spence
Golovkin/canelo if either wins a trilogy

Tank will be at Ugas Porter you want to fall through and say that to his face? Or can you only talk like that over the internet

[Oldskoolg]

But but but “boxing is dead in America doe!” Well that’s what the chav limeys say

[THEFRESHBRAWLER]

It's going to come down to who had the best wins and I think that's Ward.

Mayweather's best wins came over Canelo and Pac. But Canelo was 23 years old, and Pac was 36 and had lost a couple fights during the decade prior to facing Floyd so the significance of the fight wasn't great, plus it was a terrible fight. Outside of those two he did fight Mosley and Cotto, but they were aging opponents as well. He didn't have a signature win against a top fighter.

Ward won the Super Six and beat Froch and Kovalev. I would argue those are more impressive wins considering how on top of their game both of those fighters were. He also did it in two different weight classes.

Canelo was 23 and Pacquio was 36 lmaooo. Floyd is the only fighter who has to fight a fighter at a certain age. Canelo was 23 with multiple world title fights and nearly 50 fights. Most people who use that lame 23 excuse know that it’s not an excuse. They just hate the fact that Floyd beat him so easily. Mosley and Cotto were aging but Kovalev wasn’t lmaoooooo. Mosley was the #2p4p fighter smart guy. Cotto was 32 when he fought Floyd how old was Kovalev when he fought Ward?

[otrocubiche]

Floyd beat several hall of Famer in this decade, including Canelo and manny, no one can match that. I get that nobody likes him as a person, but no one matches what he did this decade.

[SplitSecond]

"P4P doesn't mean crap" even though you literally just used it as reasoning for why Lomachenko should get it

Mayweather beat Mosley who was P4P #3, Pacquaio who was P4P #2, Canelo who was P4P #9 and Guererro who was P4P #10.

Those are facts if you don't warrant P4P rankings to be valid then don't use it as reasoning for another fighter. Be consistent.

It's hilarious how you cite Marco Huck as "past it but still good" even though he was 2-2 in his last 4 fights and got put on his back by Glowacki yet P4P ranked fighters coming off impressive wins over other P4P ranked fighters such as Mosley and Pacquaio are shot down as shot

Are you even trying to hide your obvious bias and double standard? Because if you are you're failing miserably.

Is that canelo and guerrero much better/if at all than russel jr and linares?

[Luilun]

Lomachenko wins 3 different titles in 3 different weight classes in under 11 fights let someone top that most even the Great Mayweather were fighting bums in their first 11 fights

[SplitSecond]

Floyd beat several hall of Famer in this decade, including Canelo and manny, no one can match that. I get that nobody likes him as a person, but no one matches what he did this decade.

You're ignoring the fact that it was very early in canelo's career. Golovkin could as easily have a win over a much better canelo if not for boxing politics and pacquiao has also lost to horn and been ko'd by marquez in the decade.