Comments Thread For: WBC Prez: Wilder-Fury Rematch Will NOT Happen Next
Collapse
-
So the majority of experts scoring at ringside were "biased kunts?" How convenient.
He officially canceled the bet when he thought he was going to lose. Had he not canceled the bet, I definitely would have honored it. He probably feels pretty ****** now for canceling the bet.You were insisting that your account bet with that other troll was still on and that he had to leave this site for good if Fury/Wilder-2 happened on schedule.
Are you going to be a man of your word and leave yourself if it doesn't?Comment
-
Deontay Wilder won't if the offer is a fair and good one. Then we will have an undisputed bout in the Fall of the year between Anthony Joshua vs Deontay Wilder.Comment
-
Experts ? How old were you when you found out Santa Claus was a fictional character ?AP, ESPN, Yahoo, LA Times, Sporting News, Washington Post, etc all had a draw or Wilder winning. When that many top level publications don't have Fury winning, you can't cry robbery when the official decision is a draw.
Yes, more experts had Fury winning than had Wilder winning, but such a significant amount of experts scored the fight a draw that it's ludicrous to complain about the official judges rendering a draw as well.
It doesn't matter who had who winning , anyone who scored for Wilder winning is an idiot , anyone scoring a draw needs to know the rules of boxing , and anyone scoring for Fury are mostly everyone from fanatics to casuals .
The official judging is final say . The final say on the fight is Fury doesn't need the IMMEDIATE rematch because of the final scoring . You dont duck a fight you shouldn't have been in the first place.
If Wilder thought he could win 100% he wouldn't have tried the B.S Barclays center because that was not the agreement.Comment
-
yeah a huge amount of publications had ward beating kovalev in fight 1 and i didnt agree with that either, pure robbery imoAP, ESPN, Yahoo, LA Times, Sporting News, Washington Post, etc all had a draw or Wilder winning. When that many top level publications don't have Fury winning, you can't cry robbery when the official decision is a draw.
Yes, more experts had Fury winning than had Wilder winning, but such a significant amount of experts scored the fight a draw that it's ludicrous to complain about the official judges rendering a draw as well.Comment
-
Comment
-
-
-
The majority of experts scoring at ringside scored it for Fury, and so did I.
But you insisted that the bet was legally binding and he couldn't cancel it. You even said you would sue him if he didn't honour it.
You said that multiple times in multiple threads!Comment

Comment