Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: WBC Prez: Wilder-Fury Rematch Will NOT Happen Next

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by champion4ever View Post
    He only fought Tyson on the rebound. He never wanted him anyway. Anthony Joshua was the fight he wanted all along.

    If Tyson Fury thought he had a remote chance of having the rematch in the U.K. Then that was the deal breaker right there because there was no way that Wilder was going to capitulate to those kind of demands because Fury did not win the first fight.

    It was officially ruled a draw. Had he won the fight, then he would have had a rightful claim for choosing a venue in the U.K.

    Lastly, Fury pulled out the purse bid in an effort to increase his split of the purse percentage which was another deal breaker. Eventually Wilder may fight Tyson again but just not on these terms or on ESPN.

    Moreover, I don't see Tyson Fury giving an inch in the negotiations with Wilder either. I don't see him compromising.

    Therefore, I believe that Wilder would eventually come to his senses and listen to what Joshua and Matchroom are selling him. If Joshua is serious and sincere about fighting Wilder next, then I believe that Deontay would become flexible enough to hear what they both have to say.

    The reason being is because he knows that Anthony Joshua holds more cards and leverage at the bargaining table than Tyson Fury could ever dream. .
    Wilder won't fight AJ.

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by kafkod View Post
      Especially if you're a biased kunt.
      So the majority of experts scoring at ringside were "biased kunts?" How convenient.


      You were insisting that your account bet with that other troll was still on and that he had to leave this site for good if Fury/Wilder-2 happened on schedule.

      Are you going to be a man of your word and leave yourself if it doesn't?
      He officially canceled the bet when he thought he was going to lose. Had he not canceled the bet, I definitely would have honored it. He probably feels pretty ****** now for canceling the bet.

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by kafkod View Post
        What excuses are you guys going to come up with when AJ calls Wilder out after he KOs Big Baby and Wilder ducks him again?
        Deontay Wilder won't if the offer is a fair and good one. Then we will have an undisputed bout in the Fall of the year between Anthony Joshua vs Deontay Wilder.

        Comment


        • #44
          Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF View Post
          AP, ESPN, Yahoo, LA Times, Sporting News, Washington Post, etc all had a draw or Wilder winning. When that many top level publications don't have Fury winning, you can't cry robbery when the official decision is a draw.

          Yes, more experts had Fury winning than had Wilder winning, but such a significant amount of experts scored the fight a draw that it's ludicrous to complain about the official judges rendering a draw as well.
          Experts ? How old were you when you found out Santa Claus was a fictional character ?


          It doesn't matter who had who winning , anyone who scored for Wilder winning is an idiot , anyone scoring a draw needs to know the rules of boxing , and anyone scoring for Fury are mostly everyone from fanatics to casuals .

          The official judging is final say . The final say on the fight is Fury doesn't need the IMMEDIATE rematch because of the final scoring . You dont duck a fight you shouldn't have been in the first place.

          If Wilder thought he could win 100% he wouldn't have tried the B.S Barclays center because that was not the agreement.

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF View Post
            AP, ESPN, Yahoo, LA Times, Sporting News, Washington Post, etc all had a draw or Wilder winning. When that many top level publications don't have Fury winning, you can't cry robbery when the official decision is a draw.

            Yes, more experts had Fury winning than had Wilder winning, but such a significant amount of experts scored the fight a draw that it's ludicrous to complain about the official judges rendering a draw as well.
            yeah a huge amount of publications had ward beating kovalev in fight 1 and i didnt agree with that either, pure robbery imo

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by KTFOKING View Post
              How so? Think the fight gets bigger the longer they wait to run it back or he shouldn't ever rematch Wilder?
              The fight will get bigger and he will get better. He was miles away from his best in the first fight, and he needs the extra time to get back there.

              Comment


              • #47
                Fury has no obligation to give a rematch for a fight he obviously won.

                Comment


                • #48
                  Been rumored that Fury wants another fight before the rematch for awhile now and now he made it official

                  Oh Well all we can do is WAIT!

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by kafkod View Post
                    Wilder won't fight AJ.
                    Well, we shall see.

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF View Post
                      So the majority of experts scoring at ringside were "biased kunts?" How convenient.
                      The majority of experts scoring at ringside scored it for Fury, and so did I.

                      Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF View Post
                      He officially canceled the bet when he thought he was going to lose. Had he not canceled the bet, I definitely would have honored it. He probably feels pretty ****** now for canceling the bet.
                      But you insisted that the bet was legally binding and he couldn't cancel it. You even said you would sue him if he didn't honour it.

                      You said that multiple times in multiple threads!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP