The knock on effect could leave Whyte without the fight they had planned.
Comments Thread For: WBC Prez: Wilder-Fury Rematch Will NOT Happen Next
Collapse
-
Didn’t Fury claimed he wants that fight next on ESPN? I guess he is a dosser then. You string a guy along, then after signing the ESPN contract you claimed you want Wilder next, but your team are looking at interim fights. So now Whyte is left in limbo due to Breazeale probably fight Wilder next. If I was whyte I would be hoping Ortiz wins next week and hopefully he would be ready for April/may 2019.Comment
-
I knew damn well it was Fury holding up the rematch and not Wilder who badly wants the rematch to try again to flatten Fury and redeem himself. Now from Fury's own mouth comes the truth. That rematch is as big as it is ever going to get right now. I doubt Fury will ever fight Wilder again. He knows the world thinks he beat Wilder. He wants to leave it at that rather than rematch the always dangerous Wilder and risk getting knocked out.Comment
-
Man shut up. This is about Fury and Wilder don’t try to shift the conversation. Nice try!
You want to talk about AJ and Wilder start your own thread.Comment
-
I never believed in Santa. I was always raised to see through bull****. Which is why it's so easy to detect Hearn's tactics.
Easy to find fans who agree with you because Joshua has a lot of fans. But the actual leading experts, who were at ringside scoring the fight, many of them scored the fight a draw. So when a draw is the official verdict, there's no logical reason to cry robbery.It doesn't matter who had who winning , anyone who scored for Wilder winning is an idiot , anyone scoring a draw needs to know the rules of boxingComment
-
Fury doesn't want to get hit by Wilder anymore. I do not even know why they threw money at him casuals are not going to want to watch a heavy weight try and fight like Mayweather.Comment
-
he made a wise business decision and ran, nothing more, stop making it anything else besides this. is what it is.Comment
-
Comment
-
That's simply not true. It was approximately 40% Fury, 40% draw, 20% Wilder. 40% is not a majority. The AP, ESPN, Yahoo, LA Times, Sporting News and Washington Post all had a draw or Wilder winning. A draw was a very common score at ringside, just as common as Fury winning.
It was legally binding, but both parties agreed to cancel the agreement. When I found out Fury was signing with Arum, I gave Robbie one last chance to confirm that he'd honor the bet. When he continued to insist it was canceled, I agreed to cancel it.But you insisted that the bet was legally binding and he couldn't cancel it. You even said you would sue him if he didn't honour it.Comment
Comment