Manny Pacquiao is GREATER than Mayweather IF HE FIGHTS Keith Thurman!

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • hugh grant
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Apr 2006
    • 30648
    • 2,222
    • 940
    • 105,596

    #101
    Originally posted by The Big Dunn
    My bad I see the colon and not the 0.

    You posted that 2 wins is better than 1. Ok I posted 1 win is better than 0. Using your logic, I think Floyd would be ahead of Manny based on the clear win over him.
    But the rest of Pacs resume is better than Floyds so I don't get what your saying.
    Floyd h2h beat Pac as Floyd is bigger. Just like Hagler beat duran. But durans resume is greater than Haglers, plus duran is smaller. Now if Duran beat common opponents better than Hagler (which is what Pac did with floyd) that would be really something and he did it once with SRL.
    Pac literally beat all common opponents better than Floyd whilst being smaller, plus he has greater wins, over Barrera and Morales x2 and his wins over hatton, dlh, cotto and smm are also greater as Pac is smaller than Floyd.
    JMM has no problem in admitting Pacs better than him, even though you think JMM beat Pac 3 times. So I know who I think is biased and its not JMM. I think its you and Floyd fans.
    Last edited by hugh grant; 01-29-2019, 01:16 PM.

    Comment

    • The Big Dunn
      Undisputed Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Sep 2009
      • 70655
      • 10,207
      • 8,381
      • 287,568

      #102
      Originally posted by hugh grant
      But the rest of Pacs resume is better than Floyds so I don't get what your saying.
      Floyd h2h beat Pac as Floyd is bigger. Just like Hagler beat duran. But durans resume is greater than Haglers, plus duran is smaller. Now if Duran beat common opponents better than Hagler (which is what Pac did with floyd) that would be really something and he did it once with SRL.
      Pac literally beat all common opponents better than Floyd whilst being smaller, plus he has greater wins, over Barrera and Morales x2.
      JMM has no problem in admitting Pacs better than him, even though you think JMM beat Pac 3 times. So I know who I think is biased and its not JMM. I think its you and Floyd fans.
      No it isn't given the losses and the draws. That is the part you keep leaving out.

      Manny has no win on his resume better than Floyd's win over him. Manny has no wins against atop 30-50 ATG while Floyd does. Manny was #2 p4p when Floyd dominated him. Manny since has wins over younger guys and losses you said before were robberies

      Should he beat Thurman, that only makes Floyd's dominant win over him look better because it shows Manny wasn't as shot as his fans suggest he was when he lost to Floyd.
      Last edited by The Big Dunn; 01-29-2019, 01:27 PM.

      Comment

      • hugh grant
        Undisputed Champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Apr 2006
        • 30648
        • 2,222
        • 940
        • 105,596

        #103
        Originally posted by The Big Dunn
        No it isn't given the losses and the draws. That is the part you keep leaving out.

        Manny has no win on his resume better than Floyd's win over him. Manny has no wins against atop 25-30 ATG while Floyd does. Manny was #2 p4p when Floyd dominated him. Manny since has wins over younger guys and losses you said before were robberies

        Should he beat Thurman, that only makes Floyd's dominant win over him look better because it shows Manny wasn't as shot as his fans suggest he was when he lost to Floyd.
        We know Pac is a lot smaller than FLoyd and had a bad shoulder, not to mention many think Pac beat Floyd.
        Floyd getting credit for Pacs potential win over Thurman is reaching now. But Floyd fans always had to beg, borrow and steal credit for Floyd as much as they could. As floyds resume don't speak for itself. We know Floyd fans would rather be boasting of how he beat Sergio Martinez and Rocky fielding even. But instead have to settle for who pac beats to get credit for Floyd.
        We know Floyd fans think Floyd is greater than SRR, as FLoyd beat Nelo and Nelo beat GGG.
        Floyd don't need to beat Nelo in rematch. Floyd just needs to sit in armchair following Nelos career. That's floyds fans logic in a nutshell.
        Last edited by hugh grant; 01-29-2019, 01:24 PM.

        Comment

        • CHOWWOKKA
          lats of peace
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Oct 2011
          • 7928
          • 1,121
          • 178
          • 49,708

          #104
          Originally posted by The Big Dunn
          Using this logic Floyd's 1 win over Manny is historically better than Manny's ) wins over Floyd, so you would have to have Floyd ahead of Manny, same you have Manny ahead of JMM.
          Damnnnnnnnnnnnnn

          End of.

          Comment

          • The Big Dunn
            Undisputed Champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Sep 2009
            • 70655
            • 10,207
            • 8,381
            • 287,568

            #105
            Originally posted by hugh grant
            We know Pac is a lot smaller than FLoyd and had a bad shoulder, not to mention many think Pac beat Floyd.
            Floyd getting credit for Pacs potential win over Thurman is reaching now. But Floyd fans always had to beg, borrow and steal credit for Floyd as much as they could. As floyds resume don't speak for itself. We know Floyd fans would rather be boasting of how he beat Sergio Martinez and Rocky fielding even. But instead have to settle for who pac beats to get credit for Floyd.
            We know Floyd fans think Floyd is greater than SRR, as FLoyd beat Nelo and Nelo beat GGG.
            Floyd don't need to beat Nelo in rematch. Floyd just needs to sit in armchair following Nelos career. That's floyds fans logic in a nutshell.
            I just showed how Floyd's resume was better than Manny's by virtue of having a win over a top 30-50 ATG where Manny doesn't have that.

            Once again when Manny loses, you find a way to discredit the win. You claim Manny was hurt, JMM was on peds, or he got robbed in other losses. You give no one any credit for beating Manny but give him extra credit for every win he has. That is extremely biased and unfair.

            If you treated everyone equally, like the voters in the polls, you would have Floyd ahead of Manny as well. You are clearly letting your personal bias impact your judgement. It is insane that you have discredited every win these men have over Manny.

            SMDH!!

            Edit: to address what you added Sergio that is ridiculous. Canelo becoming a HOF fighter only makes Floyd's resume better. has nothing to do with beating GGG.

            So Does Manny need to rematch ODH, hatton and Shane to validate those wins same as you want Floyd to rematch guys he beat?
            Last edited by The Big Dunn; 01-29-2019, 01:31 PM.

            Comment

            • hugh grant
              Undisputed Champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Apr 2006
              • 30648
              • 2,222
              • 940
              • 105,596

              #106
              Originally posted by The Big Dunn
              I just showed how Floyd's resume was better than Manny's by virtue of having a win over a top 30-50 ATG where Manny doesn't have that.

              .

              SMDH!!
              No. FLoyd has a win over a smaller guy not far coming off of a ko loss with a bad shoulder. Randoph turpin has a win over the GOAT SRR, but his resumes not greater than SRR, just cos he as a win over SRR, he wouldn't be better than SRR.
              Last edited by hugh grant; 01-29-2019, 01:34 PM.

              Comment

              • j.razor
                Undisputed Champion
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Jun 2007
                • 23786
                • 265
                • 0
                • 227,586,034

                #107
                Originally posted by hugh grant
                For sure. Floyd should wait until a really weak supermiddleweight champ comes along and try get him. Like rjjj beating ruiz.
                If Floyd could have beat bad knee Sergio martinez, or rocky fielding Floyd could on paper have a valid case for being comparable to pac.
                What is your drug of choice?

                Comment

                • The Big Dunn
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Sep 2009
                  • 70655
                  • 10,207
                  • 8,381
                  • 287,568

                  #108
                  Originally posted by hugh grant
                  No. FLoyd has a win over a smaller guy not far coming off of a ko loss with a bad shoulder. Randoph turpin has a win over the GOAT SRR, but his resumes not greater than SRR, just cos he as a win over SRR, he wouldn't be better than SRR.
                  See, even though you deleted it you did it again. when Manny loses, you find a way to discredit the win. You claim Manny was hurt, JMM was on peds, or he got robbed in other losses. You give no one any credit for beating Manny but give him extra credit for every win he has. That is extremely biased and unfair.

                  You give Manny a pass for every loss and treat him like he is an undefeated boxer. On the flip side because Floyd never lost and is actually an undefeated fighter you unfairly try to lessen every win.

                  Your bias is unbelievable. If you would just treat everyone equally you would see why Floyd is greater but you can't do that.

                  Really sad!

                  Comment

                  • j.razor
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Jun 2007
                    • 23786
                    • 265
                    • 0
                    • 227,586,034

                    #109
                    Originally posted by Robi13
                    Right, and floyd never fought margarito... Look razor I know you are a huge Floyd fan. Cool, Floyd was great but Manny arguably has accomplished something that we will never see again ever.... Champ in 8 weight divisions and I think he skipped two!
                    Margarito? LMMFAO! Who the hell is margarito? LMMFAO! I respect Floyd because he did it all & beat all, he surpassed Michael Jordan. What the airwaves say about him & what I see in the films are 2 completely different things. The media tries in every way to discredit T.B.E. making up lies from he didn't fight him when he was in his prime when he know it was the other way around..media tried to discredit is 0 & they also discredit him by saying he is the best in "this era" to discredit him from All Time Greatness. No way shape or form is #48 better than T.B.E. NONE.

                    Comment

                    • j.razor
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Jun 2007
                      • 23786
                      • 265
                      • 0
                      • 227,586,034

                      #110
                      Originally posted by hugh grant
                      5 common opponents Pac beat 4 more dominantly. The one opponent Pac didn't beat more dominant!y he beat more times than floyd did. But Floyd cheated scales and blew him up 2 divisions.
                      A case can't be made for Floyd being greater than pac. These polls where Floyd is rated higher they must be half asleep when voting

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP