Does Jermall Charlo have enough tools to beat Golovkin?

[KingHippo]

You said nothing negative about Korobov and nothing positive about Golovkin which is very obviously a transparent spin. If you want to exhibit something other than a low IQ, use the pro/con angle of each fighter and how the match ups would differ. Try again.

What I said is that the Korobov fight doesn't say a thing about how a fight with Golovkin would go because they're widely different fighters. Everybody knows what Golovkin's strenghts are, but his weaknesses is what will do him in, notably poor reaction speeds, slow hands, bad defensive footwork, poor defense and bad head movement. His few strenghts don't make up for these glaring holes.

[champion4ever]

I think that Canelo Alvarez may have touched him up just enough for Jermall Charlo to stop him by way of TKO. Golovkin absorbed a lot of brutal punishment in his most previous and last bout with Ginger.

[omh]

He didn't take any more physical damage than Canelo did and Canelo did and Canelo looked great against Fielding. As for mental damage there is none. GGG thought he won. He is angry now and will come back better with something to prove. He has the heart of a fighting champion and the loss of his O on paper will only make him better with something to prove. He will crush Jermall if he fights him.

Even his trainer and promoter said he took to much damage to come back as soon as canelo he was most likely pissing blood for weeks and his face was still trashed over a month after the fight and his choice of opponent murata doesn't feel like someone who believes he won you can't seriously think golovkins jabs were doing as much damage as canelos attack on his head and body

[chitownboxing]

No he does not.

[AKAcronym]

I'm still confused about this supposed beating that Golovkin took. So he got bruises on his face, big deal. Guys talking like he received some irreparable damage are stretching it. As I've said before, take away that cut he took in the 12th and he doesn't look as bad as he did. And quite a few body shots were taken on the arms as well.

[5burowz]

Charlo's had a terrible showing last weekend. And the crying at the presser is not a good look. There's no crying in boxing.

[Navalny20!8]

No. Even this older, slower version of GGG beats him.

[richardt]

What I said is that the Korobov fight doesn't say a thing about how a fight with Golovkin would go because they're widely different fighters. Everybody knows what Golovkin's strenghts are, but his weaknesses is what will do him in, notably poor reaction speeds, slow hands, bad defensive footwork, poor defense and bad head movement. His few strenghts don't make up for these glaring holes.

No, what you said was a complete one-sided view and not the differences between Korobov and GGG....that is very obvious. You're focusing on just Korobov's strengths and GGG's weakness is a complete SPIN. If GGG was as bad as you portrayed him in your BIAS, he would have had an amateur career of 70-25 and a pro career of 16-7. Give up, and come back when you can analyse and be objective.

[KingHippo]

No, what you said was a complete one-sided view and not the differences between Korobov and GGG....that is very obvious. You're focusing on just Korobov's strengths and GGG's weakness is a complete SPIN. If GGG was as bad as you portrayed him in your BIAS, he would have had an amateur career of 70-25 and a pro career of 16-7. Give up, and come back when you can analyse and be objective.

No, no point in arguing with you. It's clear that you are an emotional poster who can't take any sort of criticism about GGG, who is unfortunately a very limited fighter whether you like it or not. You're not concerned about having a genuine debate at all. G'day sir and please grow out of the fanboy phase.

[richardt]

No, no point in arguing with you. It's clear that you are an emotional poster who can't take any sort of criticism about GGG, who is unfortunately a very limited fighter whether you like it or not. You're not concerned about having a genuine debate at all. G'day sir and please grow out of the fanboy phase.

Actually it is YOU I was criticizing, nothing to do with what you said about GGG. I saw right through you like glass. You tried to build up Korobov because he made Charlo look bad and you tried to degenerate GGG because you dislike him. Next time dont come off like such a fake with your pointing out only the positive of Korobov and the negative of GGG as if you had any point at all which you did not. Your spin was as ******ed as it gets. And I dont even have GGG in my top 10 favorite fighters, another epic fail on your part.