Comments Thread For: Lennox Lewis Backs Split, Not Flat Fee, For Joshua-Wilder Fight
Collapse
-
-
What was that split? You seem to be of the belief that what a fighter brings to the table can only be expressed in purse size. That presumes that two fighters are in the same market and pull from the same pool of fans. This is not the case. Further, Wilder brings the huge threat of a loss, the potential to see a brutal KO, the WBC belt, potential national bragging rights, a US fan base that will travel, and a small UK fan base. Those are ingredients when mixed together with what Joshua brings to the table make a mega fight. The ppv cost will be higher, the seat costs will be higher. The revenue will be far and away greater than the usual big money Joshua fights make.
In regards to what the split was I don’t know for certain. But given what has been quoted I imagine it’s in the region of 35%
My main points are the original flat fee offer was not a terrible offer. If I’m wilder I wouldn’t have accepted it but it would have been an offer that would’ve tempted me.
Secondly I don’t know why this is even being discussed because whatever offer was made it was accepted. The issue was there was no date or location on the contract or guarantee it would be next.
Finally, we know there was a percentage offer very recently so why a flat fee offer from probably six months ago is still being discussed is beyond me. If team wilder can move past previous offers why can’t his fans? The reason the fight isn’t happening next is because wilder wants to rematch fury and that’s something I can completely understand.Comment
-
He's not undisputed because Wilder has the WBC portion of the Heavyweight title. There won't be an undisputed champion until Joshua challenge Wilder for the WBC and likewise Wilder for Joshua's WBA, IBF and WBO titles. Right now they are both just belt/titleholders until they fight one another.Comment
-
And even if you were right, and the titles were "purchased," Joshua still deserves a return on his investment. A world heavyweight title belt is extremely valuable. Unless Wilder becomes a major PPV star in the US, there's just no way for him to get more than a 40% split as long as Joshua has 3 belts and he has 1. And even 60/40 may be more generous than Hearn can stomach.Comment
-
He's not undisputed because Wilder has the WBC portion of the Heavyweight title. There won't be an undisputed champion until Joshua challenge Wilder for the WBC and likewise Wilder for Joshua's WBA, IBF and WBO titles. Right now they are both just belt/titleholders until they fight one another.Comment
-
Different circumstances. At the time AJ only had 2 of the 4 belts, now he has 3 of the 4 belts so why should his split go down? That's ****** logic, 1 guy does all the hard work picking up the belts while the other spent 9 years cherry picking. 70-30 is very fair, no more than 65-35 though.Comment
-
This is why Wilder should be biting their hand off right now instead of playing hard to get. He get's the chance to be undisputed world champion despite AJ picking up all the belts.
When Mayweather beat Pac and had all the WW belts bar the IBF do you think Brook would've been worth 40% in an undisputed fight?Comment
-
Wilder made 4 million against Fury. So 4 million is acceptable to face Fury but 27-30 million to face Joshua is ludacris... What planet is this man living on?
Seriously, Wilder/Fury did 350K PPVs which means neither one of them are PPV draws. Wilder doesn’t want the fight or he doesn’t think he can win. It’s that simple. Pride and Entitlement are motherfu%ers.Comment
-
Wilder brings more than a belt to the fight, he brings high risk to Joshua. I would pick Joshua in this fight but it is a dangerous fight for him and that is why Eddie wants to avoid it.Comment
Comment