Which Robbery was worse: GGG/Canelo I, or Wilder/Fury???

[LoadedWraps]

The same but Golovkin/Canelo turned out to be worse because they did it twice

Well said.

The haters want to try and cast a shadow on GGG's greatness.

[Boxing Goat]

Personally I think the Fury robbery was more blatant, you really can't make an argument for Wilder winning, whereas at least Canelo won more than two rounds against GGG, and the fight was closer, although Golovkin won clearly.

Thoughts?

GGG landed way more than Canelo, hurt him and didn't get dropped twice. I'd say GGG got ripped off way worse.

[LoadedWraps]

GGG landed way more than Canelo, hurt him and didn't get dropped twice. I'd say GGG got ripped off way worse.

You make good points.

[LoadedWraps]

Wilder Fury atleast somebody got dropped

Will be remembered as one of the greatest fights in HW boxing history.

[GhostofDempsey]

Canelo/GGG x2. At least Wilder was able to score a knockdown and make it close. GGG was clearly robbed in both fights, especially the first one.

[denium]

Canelo/GGG x2. At least Wilder was able to score a knockdown and make it close. GGG was clearly robbed in both fights, especially the first one.

The second, nah, it was a close fight that I personally thought GGG edged.

GGG vs Canelo 1 was a worse robbery than Fury-Wilder 1

[Thuglife Nelo]

Lol.

Nobody wants Canelo GGG 3. And the GGG diehards know someone funna get TKO’d...

These same guys are afraid of AJ beating Fury and that’s why they are all game for the Trilogy. since Fury doesn’t have a choice, it’s going to be funny if he loses to Wilder..

[TonyGe]

GGG landed way more than Canelo, hurt him and didn't get dropped twice. I'd say GGG got ripped off way worse.

Ageed. Fury got the benefit of the doubt because of his back story. I thought that fight was close. There was no robbery.

[Songbird]

i was really shocked when ggg canelo was scored a draw so id say that was worse

[STREET CLEANER]

Neither were robberies, they were close fights.

Pac vs Bradley 1 was a robbery.