Another Dannie Jacobs fight without the Watsons in his corner...
Collapse
-
Wait wait wait, you said you know for a fact Haymon has nothing to do with Jacobs. The next day, Jacobs' co-manager said you're 100% full of **** and that you're blatantly lying.
Now you suggest it's a conspiracy between Haymon and Jacobs' other manager to lie about Haymon being involved. Think about how ****** you look right now. According to you, you know for a fact Haymon has no involvement, yet he also is so involved that he can tell Jacobs' co-manager to say Haymon is involved when he isn't? And further, insist he speaks with Haymon constantly and Haymon is involved in every decision, even though you claim Haymon isn't involved at all in any decision?
You're busted. Plain and simple. 100% confirmed as a giant liar.Comment
-
i don’t get how a pbc employee wrote this article. Seems like propaganda to me. I’ve never seen him here beforeComment
-
Dude. U don’t understand boxing. The 2 year extension is when a fighter signs his first contract and he never been a pro. All those 2012 Olympians had those extensions kick in Before their 5 year original deals expired if they won a title.No, you don't make sense. How is he a promotional FA when he just fought for and won the title? His contract was just extended by two years!!!! Or wait, does it not apply here? What was his deal with Hearn in the first place? Was it just a three fight deal? Was it a two year deal? What was it? Obviously the reason he is a network FA is because HBO is out of business, but is he also a promotional FA? If so, he could just sign with GBP and get the Canelo fight.
If Jacobs deal with Hearn isn’t up then he’s not a network FA. He’s a DAZN fighter.
If his deal is up then he’s a network and promotional free agent. Not hard to see.Comment
-
So are you claiming the quotes are fake? Or are you still insisting Jacobs' co-manager is lying about Haymon's involvement? Is this all a massive conspiracy against you or were you lying when you said you know for a fact Haymon has absolutely no involvement in Jacobs' career?Comment
-
nope. All that was confirmed is that a pbc writer put this article on this site. In fact u probably are that pbc writer.Wait wait wait, you said you know for a fact Haymon has nothing to do with Jacobs. The next day, Jacobs' co-manager said you're 100% full of **** and that you're blatantly lying.
Now you suggest it's a conspiracy between Haymon and Jacobs' other manager to lie about Haymon being involved. Think about how ****** you look right now. According to you, you know for a fact Haymon has no involvement, yet he also is so involved that he can tell Jacobs' co-manager to say Haymon is involved when he isn't? And further, insist he speaks with Haymon constantly and Haymon is involved in every decision, even though you claim Haymon isn't involved at all in any decision?
You're busted. Plain and simple. 100% confirmed as a giant liar.
That guy ha never written here before and now all of a sudden he writes here? What is golden boy and top ranks pr people going to do non press release articles on this site? Just a little conflict of interest isn’t it?
And as the pbc spokesperson wrote in the article Connolly has several fighters with Haymon so obviously Haymon has influence in Connolly and absolutely could have made him say that.Comment
-
No, you said promotional contracts are like Haymon's contracts which was incorrect. Stop trying to make crap up now. Hearn could have technically still added a clause where the contract gets extended if Jacobs won a title. Doesn't just go for those turning pro. So yes, incorrect again.Dude. U don’t understand boxing. The 2 year extension is when a fighter signs his first contract and he never been a pro. All those 2012 Olympians had those extensions kick in Before their 5 year original deals expired if they won a title.
If Jacobs deal with Hearn isn’t up then he’s not a network FA. He’s a DAZN fighter.
If his deal is up then he’s a network and promotional free agent. Not hard to see.
So if the deal is up, then that means Jacobs only had signed a three fight deal with Hearn and not a two or three year deal. Another thing that differs from Haymon's contracts.Comment
-
Propaganda? We are talking about DIRECT quotes from the manager. What the hell is wrong with you? Or do you think the manager didn't actually say any of this and it was misquoted?Comment
-
why would jacobs manager and Haymon have a conspiracy theory against little ol me? Why would they care what some Mexican fan in LA thinks?So are you claiming the quotes are fake? Or are you still insisting Jacobs' co-manager is lying about Haymon's involvement? Is this all a massive conspiracy against you or were you lying when you said you know for a fact Haymon has absolutely no involvement in Jacobs' career?Comment
-
jacobs signed a three fight deal with Hearn. Haymon signed Pacquiao to a 2 fight deal.No, you said promotional contracts are like Haymon's contracts which was incorrect. Stop trying to make crap up now. Hearn could have technically still added a clause where the contract gets extended if Jacobs won a title. Doesn't just go for those turning pro. So yes, incorrect again.
So if the deal is up, then that means Jacobs only had signed a three fight deal with Hearn and not a two or three year deal. Another thing that differs from Haymon's contracts.Comment
Comment