Another Dannie Jacobs fight without the Watsons in his corner...

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • KTFOKING
    Undisputed Champion
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Jun 2018
    • 14399
    • 1,266
    • 284
    • 344,781

    #71
    Originally posted by killakali
    u don’t think Haymon may have told him to say that ? Isn’t the writer of the article the guy who writes for the pbc website? I am surprised boxingscene used an article from a promoter.
    Why the hell does it matter who wrote the article? Can you not f'n read? Those are direct quotes from Jacobs manager. I could have wrote the article FFS and it wouldn't change a thing.

    Now Haymon TOLD him to say that huh? Interesting.

    Comment

    • N/A
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Jul 2017
      • 9269
      • 214
      • 0
      • 12

      #72
      Originally posted by killakali
      u don’t think Haymon may have told him to say that ?
      Wait wait wait, you said you know for a fact Haymon has nothing to do with Jacobs. The next day, Jacobs' co-manager said you're 100% full of **** and that you're blatantly lying.

      Now you suggest it's a conspiracy between Haymon and Jacobs' other manager to lie about Haymon being involved. Think about how ****** you look right now. According to you, you know for a fact Haymon has no involvement, yet he also is so involved that he can tell Jacobs' co-manager to say Haymon is involved when he isn't? And further, insist he speaks with Haymon constantly and Haymon is involved in every decision, even though you claim Haymon isn't involved at all in any decision?

      You're busted. Plain and simple. 100% confirmed as a giant liar.

      Comment

      • killakali
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Oct 2010
        • 7197
        • 226
        • 171
        • 87,195

        #73
        Originally posted by KTFOKING
        Why the hell does it matter who wrote the article? Can you not f'n read? Those are direct quotes from Jacobs manager. I could have wrote the article FFS and it wouldn't change a thing.

        Now Haymon TOLD him to say that huh? Interesting.
        i don’t get how a pbc employee wrote this article. Seems like propaganda to me. I’ve never seen him here before

        Comment

        • killakali
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Oct 2010
          • 7197
          • 226
          • 171
          • 87,195

          #74
          Originally posted by KTFOKING
          No, you don't make sense. How is he a promotional FA when he just fought for and won the title? His contract was just extended by two years!!!! Or wait, does it not apply here? What was his deal with Hearn in the first place? Was it just a three fight deal? Was it a two year deal? What was it? Obviously the reason he is a network FA is because HBO is out of business, but is he also a promotional FA? If so, he could just sign with GBP and get the Canelo fight.
          Dude. U don’t understand boxing. The 2 year extension is when a fighter signs his first contract and he never been a pro. All those 2012 Olympians had those extensions kick in Before their 5 year original deals expired if they won a title.

          If Jacobs deal with Hearn isn’t up then he’s not a network FA. He’s a DAZN fighter.

          If his deal is up then he’s a network and promotional free agent. Not hard to see.

          Comment

          • N/A
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Jul 2017
            • 9269
            • 214
            • 0
            • 12

            #75
            Originally posted by killakali
            i don’t get how a pbc employee wrote this article. Seems like propaganda to me. I’ve never seen him here before
            So are you claiming the quotes are fake? Or are you still insisting Jacobs' co-manager is lying about Haymon's involvement? Is this all a massive conspiracy against you or were you lying when you said you know for a fact Haymon has absolutely no involvement in Jacobs' career?

            Comment

            • killakali
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Oct 2010
              • 7197
              • 226
              • 171
              • 87,195

              #76
              Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF
              Wait wait wait, you said you know for a fact Haymon has nothing to do with Jacobs. The next day, Jacobs' co-manager said you're 100% full of **** and that you're blatantly lying.

              Now you suggest it's a conspiracy between Haymon and Jacobs' other manager to lie about Haymon being involved. Think about how ****** you look right now. According to you, you know for a fact Haymon has no involvement, yet he also is so involved that he can tell Jacobs' co-manager to say Haymon is involved when he isn't? And further, insist he speaks with Haymon constantly and Haymon is involved in every decision, even though you claim Haymon isn't involved at all in any decision?

              You're busted. Plain and simple. 100% confirmed as a giant liar.
              nope. All that was confirmed is that a pbc writer put this article on this site. In fact u probably are that pbc writer.

              That guy ha never written here before and now all of a sudden he writes here? What is golden boy and top ranks pr people going to do non press release articles on this site? Just a little conflict of interest isn’t it?

              And as the pbc spokesperson wrote in the article Connolly has several fighters with Haymon so obviously Haymon has influence in Connolly and absolutely could have made him say that.

              Comment

              • KTFOKING
                Undisputed Champion
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Jun 2018
                • 14399
                • 1,266
                • 284
                • 344,781

                #77
                Originally posted by killakali
                Dude. U don’t understand boxing. The 2 year extension is when a fighter signs his first contract and he never been a pro. All those 2012 Olympians had those extensions kick in Before their 5 year original deals expired if they won a title.

                If Jacobs deal with Hearn isn’t up then he’s not a network FA. He’s a DAZN fighter.

                If his deal is up then he’s a network and promotional free agent. Not hard to see.
                No, you said promotional contracts are like Haymon's contracts which was incorrect. Stop trying to make crap up now. Hearn could have technically still added a clause where the contract gets extended if Jacobs won a title. Doesn't just go for those turning pro. So yes, incorrect again.

                So if the deal is up, then that means Jacobs only had signed a three fight deal with Hearn and not a two or three year deal. Another thing that differs from Haymon's contracts.

                Comment

                • KTFOKING
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Jun 2018
                  • 14399
                  • 1,266
                  • 284
                  • 344,781

                  #78
                  Originally posted by killakali
                  i don’t get how a pbc employee wrote this article. Seems like propaganda to me. I’ve never seen him here before
                  Propaganda? We are talking about DIRECT quotes from the manager. What the hell is wrong with you? Or do you think the manager didn't actually say any of this and it was misquoted?

                  Comment

                  • killakali
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Oct 2010
                    • 7197
                    • 226
                    • 171
                    • 87,195

                    #79
                    Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF
                    So are you claiming the quotes are fake? Or are you still insisting Jacobs' co-manager is lying about Haymon's involvement? Is this all a massive conspiracy against you or were you lying when you said you know for a fact Haymon has absolutely no involvement in Jacobs' career?
                    why would jacobs manager and Haymon have a conspiracy theory against little ol me? Why would they care what some Mexican fan in LA thinks?

                    Comment

                    • killakali
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Oct 2010
                      • 7197
                      • 226
                      • 171
                      • 87,195

                      #80
                      Originally posted by KTFOKING
                      No, you said promotional contracts are like Haymon's contracts which was incorrect. Stop trying to make crap up now. Hearn could have technically still added a clause where the contract gets extended if Jacobs won a title. Doesn't just go for those turning pro. So yes, incorrect again.

                      So if the deal is up, then that means Jacobs only had signed a three fight deal with Hearn and not a two or three year deal. Another thing that differs from Haymon's contracts.
                      jacobs signed a three fight deal with Hearn. Haymon signed Pacquiao to a 2 fight deal.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP