Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Conte Supports Decision To Deny License To Billy Joe Saunders

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by bigdunny1 View Post
    Dip shyt Saunders will be stripped and suspended it's just has to play out but a matter of time. Just like it took how long until Canelo was suspended? What April 18? Yet the post I quoted you in was in March days after the failed test went public before he was charged, found guilty or suspended. Billy H0e put out statements that Canelo should be banned for life and was forever a drug cheat days after the failed drug test went public with NO trial or suspension yet. You a are fraud with this lets wait before we rush to judge him when you didn't wait for Canelo, Saunders didn't wait. And saying he hasn't been suspended yet so let's hold off LMAO
    BJS might possibly be stripped of his title for telling the Massachusettes Athletics Commission to suck his dick during a conference call.

    But he won't be charged and suspended for PED abuse because of this.

    If you want to take me up on an account bet over that, just say the word.

    Comment


    • #42
      I Don't understand how there can be any ambiguity over this. Saunders signed up for vada,he failed a vada test, therefore he cheated and is banned. There's no murky ground here, he's a cheat.

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by kafkod View Post
        Canelo - charged with PED abuse, found to be guilty and suspended.

        BJS - not charged with anything.

        Spot the difference?
        Then why he is not fighting on the 22nd of this Month in Massachusetts at all? In addition, why was his WBO title has been stripped from him and is now vacant?

        I'll tell you why. It's because he has been denied a license to fight in the state of Massachusetts; The MSAC to be exact for doping and popping for PED abuse.

        It's the exact same reason why he was stripped of his WBO title and it's now vacant. It's because of his doping and being popped for PED abuse.

        Do you spot the difference?

        Comment


        • #44
          Originally posted by whoseyourdaddy View Post
          VADA also said in their initial report that the levels of clembuterol in Canelo's system was consistent with tainted meat!!! Did you gave Canelo the benefit of the doubt? Hell NO!!! you judged him, condemned him and crucified him immediately after the initial report so you can't have it both ways.

          I'm the kind of person who believes in second chances, and wait for all the facts (as I worked as a counselor, marriage disputes, youth etc.) but I also like to give you insensitive midget minded group a taste of your own hater, rancorous jealous medicine.
          You must have been a crappy counselor if you can't understand the difference between charged, found guilty, punished.

          And not charged, because no chargeable offence has been committed.

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by DramaShow View Post
            I Don't understand how there can be any ambiguity over this. Saunders signed up for vada,he failed a vada test, therefore he cheated and is banned. There's no murky ground here, he's a cheat.
            Good man and good post!

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by bigdunny1 View Post
              Saunders and his own promoter didn't wait until we have all the facts before passing judgement for others who failed a test. Hell without knowing any of the facts saunders and his promoter just months ago said if you fail a test you are forever a drug cheater in my eyes I don't care about any excuses you give you are responsible for what you put in your body we are trained professionals we know everything we are taking and it's effects on our body's these are lies and excuses for cheaters. If you fail a test you need to be banned for life that was his own words. I say we treat him exactly how he treated others.
              I'm noticing you're not spotting the hypocrisy in your own behaviour, man. I do seem to recall you proclaiming Canelo's innocence to every man and his dog a few months ago when in fact the evidence was inconclusive either way. You forgotten about that? I shouldn't be so quick to throw around accusations of hypocrisy, man, cos that **** can bite you on the ass.

              Comment


              • #47
                Victor Conte is a *****ing Rat who belongs in federal prison

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by champion4ever View Post
                  Then why he is not fighting on the 22nd of this Month in Massachusetts at all? In addition, why was his WBO title has been stripped from him and is now vacant?

                  I'll tell you why. It's because he has been denied a license to fight in the state of Massachusetts; The MSAC to be exact for doping and popping for PED abuse.

                  It's the exact same reason why he was stripped of his WBO title and it's now vacant. It's because of his doping and being popped for PED abuse.

                  Do you spot the difference?
                  The difference between what and what?

                  And has BJS hasn't been stripped of his title. Get your facts right if you want to play the "I'm smarter than you game"

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by kafkod View Post
                    BJS might possibly be stripped of his title for telling the Massachusettes Athletics Commission to suck his dick during a conference call.

                    But he won't be charged and suspended for PED abuse because of this.

                    If you want to take me up on an account bet over that, just say the word.
                    So your dumbazzz has no clue for sure just like you didn't with Canelo yet with Canelo you condemned him over a month before he suspended long before any evidence came out. So it's fine to rush to judge Canelo without facts and before he is suspended but not Saunders? You 2 faced bytch LMAO

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Originally posted by Koba-Grozny View Post
                      I'm noticing you're not spotting the hypocrisy in your own behaviour, man. I do seem to recall you proclaiming Canelo's innocence to every man and his dog a few months ago when in fact the evidence was inconclusive either way. You forgotten about that? I shouldn't be so quick to throw around accusations of hypocrisy, man, cos that **** can bite you on the ass.
                      He was also still proclaiming Canelo's innocence after he had been charged, found guilty and suspended!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP