Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: De La Hoya Not Ruling Out Canelo vs. Golovkin Trilogy

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #71
    Originally posted by TonyGe View Post
    Yeah nothing to discuss I agree.


    mind answering the question Tony Baloney ?


    which of the 4 official scoring criteria covers " volume " ?

    you do know the difference between amateur scoring and professional scoring..... right?

    where does the official scoring criteria cover pitty-pat jabs ?

    * clean effective punching
    * effective aggression
    * ring generalship
    * defense

    Comment


    • #72
      Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
      hey, the world's #1 Charlo fan, here to support his guy

      keep rocking for Charlo bro
      Well if you want to get into it.

      Your post that I found laughable
      out-land and out-work" are not valid scoring criteria,

      My response
      Wow

      Your deliberate misrepresentation if what you initially wrote in your rebuttal.

      which of the 4 official scoring criteria covers " volume " ?

      My gut feeling.
      Your a two faced little weasel. That's ridicule by the way.

      Comment


      • #73
        Originally posted by TonyGe View Post
        Well if you want to get into it.

        Your post that I found laughable
        out-land and out-work" are not valid scoring criteria,

        My response
        Wow

        Your deliberate misrepresentation if what you initially wrote in your rebuttal.

        which of the 4 official scoring criteria covers " volume " ?

        My gut feeling.
        Your a two faced little weasel. That's ridicule by the way.



        kid, I DO want to get into it !!

        answer the fkn question, you casual-fan muppet

        which of the 4 official scoring criteria covers " out-land " ?

        and which of the 4 official scoring criteria covers " volume "..... because, that is what "out-work" means, right?

        you do know the difference between amateur scoring and professional scoring..... right?

        where does the official scoring criteria cover pitty-pat jabs ?

        * clean effective punching
        * effective aggression
        * ring generalship
        * defense

        even in the am's, a back-hand or power-punch scores more than a jab

        Jabkin should know that, even if you casuals do not

        show me where pitty-pat jabs, or "volume", is valid scoring criteria

        it is more about who wins the exchanges and who controls the fight

        well..... one of those guys fought his fight, the other guy did not

        and the guy who could not fight his fight, is the same guy who got backed-up and beaten-up

        even his own trainer admitted that he did not win the fight

        Comment


        • #74
          Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
          kid, I DO want to get into it !!

          answer the fkn question, you casual-fan muppet




          even in the am's, a back-hand or power-punch scores more than a jab

          Jabkin should know that, even if you casuals do not

          show me where pitty-pat jabs, or "volume", is valid scoring criteria

          it is more about who wins the exchanges and who controls the fight

          well..... one of those guys fought his fight, the other guy did not

          and the guy who could not fight his fight, is the same guy who got backed-up and beaten-up

          even his own trainer admitted that he did not win the fight
          Stop trying to deflect. You said outlanding and out working your opponent are not factors in determining the outcome of a fight which is clearly false. Backhand punches are not counted as scoring punches in fact they are illegal.

          Comment


          • #75
            Originally posted by Rigpig View Post
            You obviously didn’t read my post or didn’t understand it. Your the dumbass as someone else noticed to.
            I read it and basically it said you dont know sht about boxing. If GGG could knock down Canelo he would of won ******. No robbery on close fights so take a tampon and shove it up your Kunt and quit FKN crying like the Bi@tch u are.

            Comment


            • #76
              Originally posted by TonyGe View Post
              Stop trying to deflect. You said outlanding and out working your opponent are not factors in determining the outcome of a fight which is clearly false. Backhand punches are not counted as scoring punches in fact they are illegal.
              Didnt ypu predict GGG by EASY TKO???

              Comment


              • #77
                Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
                mind answering the question Tony Baloney ?
                That dumb *** has been saying ggg by tko and Canelo a ducker for like ever.

                Comment


                • #78
                  Originally posted by Jab jab boom View Post
                  WTF are you talking about? You asked me where, I told you. You in the vicinity, feel free to let me know and we'll work something out.
                  Be my pleasure. Show you what a REAL liver shot feels like since you dont REALLY box. Ill work the body until your fat lil belly is all covered in red and then start feinting and going to your fat neck and double chin...You can do your back footed jab all you want.

                  Comment


                  • #79
                    Originally posted by Shadoww702 View Post
                    Didnt ypu predict GGG by EASY TKO???
                    What the hell is that got to do with whether a backhanded punch is legal or illegal. I predicted Golovkin would win by KO not TKO. You got that wrong. I never claimed it would be easy. Wrong again. I also said the KO would happen if he went to the body. You left that part out.. So wrong again. I still maintain if he would have went to the body in both matches he would have ended up the official winner. Anyway back to the point I was making. A back handed punch is not a scoring punch and is subjected to a penalty.

                    Comment


                    • #80
                      Originally posted by TonyGe View Post
                      What the hell is that got to do with whether a backhanded punch is legal or illegal. I predicted Golovkin would win by KO not TKO. You got that wrong. I never claimed it would be easy. Wrong again. I also said the KO would happen if he went to the body. You left that part out.. So wrong again. I still maintain if he would have went to the body in both matches he would have ended up the official winner. Anyway back to the point I was making. A back handed punch is not a scoring punch and is subjected to a penalty.
                      Yawn.... You cry alot. Do you EVER just STFU and admit your wrong???

                      LMFAO!!!!! KO HOLY SHT your dumb as ***!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP