Originally posted by Shadoww702
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: De La Hoya Not Ruling Out Canelo vs. Golovkin Trilogy
Collapse
-
-
-
I treat every opponent I fight better than me. And thats how you win.
Unlike jab jab who thinks everyone he can KTFO... Even before they fight
Comment
-
Originally posted by Shadoww702 View Posthold your own?? You sure you aint P4P #1 in the WORLD???
You dont even know me and say you would KMTFO EASILY
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jab jab boom View PostI can tell by how you talk you ain't s***. Too emotional and take stuff with Canelo too personal. Someone who boxes wouldn't get all caught up in the fact that not everyone thinks Canelo deserved to win and think Canelos overrated and entitled. Someone who could box would understand why that's the perception. Fan boys who can't box just pout when someone doesn't agree with them.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Shadoww702 View PostI read it and basically it said you dont know sht about boxing. If GGG could knock down Canelo he would of won ******. No robbery on close fights so take a tampon and shove it up your Kunt and quit FKN crying like the Bi@tch u are.
Comment
-
Originally posted by TonyGe View PostStop trying to deflect. You said outlanding and out working your opponent are not factors in determining the outcome of a fight which is clearly false. Backhand punches are not counted as scoring punches in fact they are illegal.
fcuk you're a ****** Tony Baloney
1) show me which of the 4 official scoring criteria accounts for "outlanding and outworking your opponent"..... you little ******.....
* clean effective punching
* effective aggression
* ring generalship
* defense
WAITING !!
you clearly have no idea how to score a professional boxing match..... like the rest of the tards
it is about who wins the exchanges and who controls the fight
and kid, a "back-hand" in boxing terms, is the rear hand depending on what stance you use..... in other words, the hand you do not jab with..... how the fcuk could you not know that you dribbly casual-fan idiot?
loooool
not only do you have no idea how to score a fight, you do not even understand the basics of boxing
log off dummy, give it up lol
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Postfcuk you're a ****** Tony Baloney
1) show me which of the 4 official scoring criteria accounts for "outlanding and outworking your opponent"..... you little ******.....
show me where pitty-pat jabs, or "volume", is valid scoring criteria, you casual-fan muppet
WAITING !!
you clearly have no idea how to score a professional boxing match..... like the rest of the tards
it is about who wins the exchanges and who controls the fight
and kid, a "back-hand" in boxing terms, is the rear hand depending on what stance you use..... in other words, the hand you do not jab with..... how the fcuk could you not know that you dribbly casual-fan idiot?
loooool
not only do you have no idea how to score a fight, you do not even understand the basics of boxing
log off dummy, give it up lol
Comment
-
Originally posted by TonyGe View PostWhat the hell is that got to do with whether a backhanded punch is legal or illegal. I predicted Golovkin would win by KO not TKO. You got that wrong. I never claimed it would be easy. Wrong again. I also said the KO would happen if he went to the body. You left that part out.. So wrong again. I still maintain if he would have went to the body in both matches he would have ended up the official winner. Anyway back to the point I was making. A back handed punch is not a scoring punch and is subjected to a penalty.
you dumb casual-fan loser.....
I personally told you why Golovkin did not throw any body-shots in the first fight..... he kept them hands at home when he realized how sharp Canelo was, the body was not there to work.....
..... and I told you that nothing had changed, so he will not work the body in the rematch either
but no, you carried on with your casual-fan ******ity
Canelo turned him into a good boy lol
1) you're wrong
2) you don't know why you are wrong
3) you don't know why you are wrong, despite the fact that it was clearly explained to you
Tony Baloney..... you are a total ****head for thinking that Golovkin simply "forgot" to work the body, without realizing that he could not work the body..... and then giving no thought whatsoever to why he could not work the body
Comment
Comment