Comments Thread For: De La Hoya Not Ruling Out Canelo vs. Golovkin Trilogy

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Jab jab boom
    Undisputed Champion
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Feb 2018
    • 11233
    • 4,868
    • 296
    • 118,331

    #101
    Originally posted by Shadoww702
    what legit pro you spar with liar??? You probably KO'd them all
    Nah, I've gotten whooped at times , but I generally hold my own regardless of the level.

    Comment

    • Shadoww702
      Banned
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Sep 2015
      • 41176
      • 4,546
      • 2,938
      • 250,035

      #102
      Originally posted by Jab jab boom
      Nah, I've gotten whooped at times , but I generally hold my own regardless of the level.
      hold your own?? You sure you aint P4P #1 in the WORLD???

      You dont even know me and say you would KMTFO EASILY

      Comment

      • Shadoww702
        Banned
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Sep 2015
        • 41176
        • 4,546
        • 2,938
        • 250,035

        #103
        I treat every opponent I fight better than me. And thats how you win.

        Unlike jab jab who thinks everyone he can KTFO... Even before they fight

        Comment

        • Jab jab boom
          Undisputed Champion
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Feb 2018
          • 11233
          • 4,868
          • 296
          • 118,331

          #104
          Originally posted by Shadoww702
          hold your own?? You sure you aint P4P #1 in the WORLD???

          You dont even know me and say you would KMTFO EASILY
          I can tell by how you talk you ain't s***. Too emotional and take stuff with Canelo too personal. Someone who boxes wouldn't get all caught up in the fact that not everyone thinks Canelo deserved to win and think Canelos overrated and entitled. Someone who could box would understand why that's the perception. Fan boys who can't box just pout when someone doesn't agree with them.

          Comment

          • Shadoww702
            Banned
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Sep 2015
            • 41176
            • 4,546
            • 2,938
            • 250,035

            #105
            Originally posted by Jab jab boom
            I can tell by how you talk you ain't s***. Too emotional and take stuff with Canelo too personal. Someone who boxes wouldn't get all caught up in the fact that not everyone thinks Canelo deserved to win and think Canelos overrated and entitled. Someone who could box would understand why that's the perception. Fan boys who can't box just pout when someone doesn't agree with them.
            I have GGG/ Canelo 1-1

            Comment

            • Rigpig
              Interim Champion
              Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
              • Aug 2014
              • 759
              • 266
              • 130
              • 16,922

              #106
              Originally posted by Shadoww702
              I read it and basically it said you dont know sht about boxing. If GGG could knock down Canelo he would of won ******. No robbery on close fights so take a tampon and shove it up your Kunt and quit FKN crying like the Bi@tch u are.
              What we have here is a keyboard warrior. Probably a deadbeat living off mom and dad. Get a life.

              Comment

              • aboutfkntime
                Undisputed Champion
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Feb 2015
                • 47370
                • 1,631
                • 3,563
                • 391,308

                #107
                Originally posted by TonyGe
                Stop trying to deflect. You said outlanding and out working your opponent are not factors in determining the outcome of a fight which is clearly false. Backhand punches are not counted as scoring punches in fact they are illegal.


                fcuk you're a ****** Tony Baloney


                1) show me which of the 4 official scoring criteria accounts for "outlanding and outworking your opponent"..... you little ******.....

                * clean effective punching
                * effective aggression
                * ring generalship
                * defense
                show me where pitty-pat jabs, or "volume", is valid scoring criteria, you casual-fan muppet

                WAITING !!

                you clearly have no idea how to score a professional boxing match..... like the rest of the tards

                it is about who wins the exchanges and who controls the fight

                and kid, a "back-hand" in boxing terms, is the rear hand depending on what stance you use..... in other words, the hand you do not jab with..... how the fcuk could you not know that you dribbly casual-fan idiot?

                loooool

                not only do you have no idea how to score a fight, you do not even understand the basics of boxing

                log off dummy, give it up lol

                Comment

                • Shadoww702
                  Banned
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Sep 2015
                  • 41176
                  • 4,546
                  • 2,938
                  • 250,035

                  #108
                  Originally posted by Rigpig
                  What we have here is a keyboard warrior. Probably a deadbeat living off mom and dad. Get a life.
                  Im the guy who bets $$$ on fights while your the one who say the guy who ran out of the ring CRYING like a B ITCH was robbed

                  Comment

                  • Shadoww702
                    Banned
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Sep 2015
                    • 41176
                    • 4,546
                    • 2,938
                    • 250,035

                    #109
                    Originally posted by aboutfkntime
                    fcuk you're a ****** Tony Baloney


                    1) show me which of the 4 official scoring criteria accounts for "outlanding and outworking your opponent"..... you little ******.....



                    show me where pitty-pat jabs, or "volume", is valid scoring criteria, you casual-fan muppet

                    WAITING !!

                    you clearly have no idea how to score a professional boxing match..... like the rest of the tards

                    it is about who wins the exchanges and who controls the fight

                    and kid, a "back-hand" in boxing terms, is the rear hand depending on what stance you use..... in other words, the hand you do not jab with..... how the fcuk could you not know that you dribbly casual-fan idiot?

                    loooool

                    not only do you have no idea how to score a fight, you do not even understand the basics of boxing

                    log off dummy, give it up lol
                    Where is the meme of ggg running out of the ring crying???

                    Comment

                    • aboutfkntime
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Feb 2015
                      • 47370
                      • 1,631
                      • 3,563
                      • 391,308

                      #110
                      Originally posted by TonyGe
                      What the hell is that got to do with whether a backhanded punch is legal or illegal. I predicted Golovkin would win by KO not TKO. You got that wrong. I never claimed it would be easy. Wrong again. I also said the KO would happen if he went to the body. You left that part out.. So wrong again. I still maintain if he would have went to the body in both matches he would have ended up the official winner. Anyway back to the point I was making. A back handed punch is not a scoring punch and is subjected to a penalty.



                      you dumb casual-fan loser.....

                      I personally told you why Golovkin did not throw any body-shots in the first fight..... he kept them hands at home when he realized how sharp Canelo was, the body was not there to work.....

                      ..... and I told you that nothing had changed, so he will not work the body in the rematch either

                      but no, you carried on with your casual-fan ******ity

                      Canelo turned him into a good boy lol

                      1) you're wrong
                      2) you don't know why you are wrong
                      3) you don't know why you are wrong, despite the fact that it was clearly explained to you

                      Tony Baloney..... you are a total ****head for thinking that Golovkin simply "forgot" to work the body, without realizing that he could not work the body..... and then giving no thought whatsoever to why he could not work the body

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP