Comments Thread For: De La Hoya Not Ruling Out Canelo vs. Golovkin Trilogy
Collapse
-
-
The guy said he needs two knockdowns to win and he obviously isn't going to get them. You're essentially agreeing with him and then YOU call HIM dumb.Last edited by TonyGe; 10-04-2018, 01:59 PM.Comment
-
I had Golovkin by one round without reviewing the fight.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
GGG doesn't have a belt so he isn't technically bound to fighting Charlo to get the Canelo fight. GGGvs Canelo outweighs Canleo Charlo or GGGvsCharloGolovkin probably isn't fighting until May, so I'm okay with Canelo fighting Lemieux in December-January. With that said, if that happens, how does the whole mandatory situation play out? Wouldn't that technically be his voluntary defense? Although then, it seems Golovkin vs Charlo would still have to happen?
Meaning... Canelo gets more than 1 voluntary defense?Comment
-
Comment
-
It was a great second fight, why not do it again? Whiny GGG fans are the only ones who don't want to see them fight again. 2 fights that were really close, neither fighter has proven to be clearly better than the other no matter how you scored either fight. They still have very different skillsets that make for a good match up.
Canelo proved he can change his style more than GGG can, but I don't know if he's any better than GGG still. My thoughts are that Canelo would probably win an easier decision in round 3, but I've been surprised before. I think that Canelo has figured out what GGG wants to do in the ring and knows how to attack it.
I want to see Charlo in the mix too, but I think he needs a couple more fights at 160 to be ready.Comment
Comment