GGG vs Carl Froch
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
And GGG isn't all those things? You don't care about size, why? Wasn't that all GGGs fans excuse against Jacobs? Now suddenly size isn't important in fantasy land.Comment
-
At that stage any fight Froch took would have been a huge pay day. I think the fact that he didn't take any fight prob shows where he was mentally and physically. 38 years old, wealthy, lacking motivation.If frotch though he could beat ggg he would have taken the fight. He had the judges and the homecourt advatage and it would have been a massive payday. Second ******s don't understand how styles make fight. Canelo is a defensive genius and shows up close to 180 lbs fight night. Frotch's defense is terrible and he is there to be hit by ggg and his footwork is garbage. GGG wins this.
Yes we've heard this all before, terrible defence, no footwork, awful boxer, no skills, yet he's a future HOF'er who went through a gauntlet of top to elite fighters, strange that.Comment
-
Comment
-
Jacobs is a lot better boxer than Froch. He has size but also athleticism, speed, good movement. He makes Froch look like a caveman. I'm not even really a GGG fan (I thought he lost to Canelo) but skillwise he is well above Froch. GGG would have been a bad style matchup for him.Comment
-
Comment
-
You’re ******edJacobs is a lot better boxer than Froch. He has size but also athleticism, speed, good movement. He makes Froch look like a caveman. I'm not even really a GGG fan (I thought he lost to Canelo) but skillwise he is well above Froch. GGG would have been a bad style matchup for him.Comment
Comment