SO did wilder duck Whyte?

[LacedUp]

Hearn clearly wanted to delay Ortiz as long as possible. Ortiz did what had to be done to become mandatory whereas Whyte ducked Ortiz and refused the final eliminator.

Yeah sure did. Signed him and gave him a few bums to look good against on British tv and on Joshua's undercard similarly to how he did it with Whyte and with Povetkin in the past.

Clearly trying to avoid him doe

Whyte didn't avoid nothing. Whyte said he'd fight Ortiz if it was actually a final eliminator, but the WBC said it would be for the "second mandatory" And also - He fought a guy ranked higher than Ortiz and who was a former champion

How many mandatories has Wilder fought in his 3 year reign? One I believe. So this means according to stats, Whyte could wait a further 5-6 years to get his shot at Wilder - A guy he already made multiple offers to, that were rejected for reasons unknown to people with normally functioning brains.

He wasn't trying to fight the old man who just got KOd, he's trying to fight the man who beat him.

Luis Ortiz is only some kind of name in Wilder's pathetic fangirls' mind, not in real life.

[Tyistall]

You have no idea what Wilder has made in a fight, so right off the bat we know you're lying. Whyte vs. Parker wasn't even shown in the US. Again, Whyte is completely unknown here. It's as if he doesn't exist. Fury has gotten a lot of exposure in the US, Whyte hasn't.




You have no idea if that's true and even if it was, Wilder is guaranteed more than that for the Fury fight.




You're lying. Wilder will make wayyyyyy more than 2 million for the Fury fight. You're literally just making numbers up.

So, I give you a bunch of facts and you only respond to the ones that you can try and manipulate? Hahahahah you are a ****head in the highest order dumbass. I'm done responding to you now. Good luck cheering for your idol. He'll get KOed within a year. Book it.

[N/A]

Whyte didn't avoid nothing. Whyte said he'd fight Ortiz if it was actually a final eliminator, but the WBC said it would be for the "second mandatory"

It was a final eliminator. Yes the winner would be a second mandatory because Whyte waited so long without ever agreeing to a final eliminator that there is a mandatory already. Whyte only pulled out once he found out Ortiz was the opponent. Had nothing to do with Breazeale being in front of the line. Whyte knew that before agreeing to the final eliminator. It was Ortiz he was avoiding.

And also - He fought a guy ranked higher than Ortiz and who was a former champion

That's a lie. Ortiz was higher than Parker and would have been the betting favorite as well.

How many mandatories has Wilder fought in his 3 year reign? One I believe. So this means according to stats, Whyte could wait a further 5-6 years to get his shot at Wilde

He's fought one because Povetkin kept delaying their fight, and then failed multiple drug tests.

If Hearn considered Parker a more dangerous fight than Ortiz, why would he had chosen Parker when beating Parker gained Whyte absolutely nothing, while beating Ortiz would gain a guaranteed title shot, even if it was a year or two away?

I can understand not caring about the final eliminator since Whyte is fighting AJ in April anyway, but it still only makes sense to choose Parker if you consider Parker the safer fight, which clearly most experts would agree fighting Parker is safer than fighting Ortiz.

[LacedUp]

It was a final eliminator. Yes the winner would be a second mandatory because Whyte waited so long without ever agreeing to a final eliminator that there is a mandatory already. Whyte only pulled out once he found out Ortiz was the opponent. Had nothing to do with Breazeale being in front of the line. Whyte knew that before agreeing to the final eliminator. It was Ortiz he was avoiding.




That's a lie. Ortiz was higher than Parker and would have been the betting favorite as well.




He's fought one because Povetkin kept delaying their fight, and then failed multiple drug tests.

If Hearn considered Parker a more dangerous fight than Ortiz, why would he had chosen Parker when beating Parker gained Whyte absolutely nothing, while beating Ortiz would gain a guaranteed title shot, even if it was a year or two away?

I can understand not caring about the final eliminator since Whyte is fighting AJ in April anyway, but it still only makes sense to choose Parker if you consider Parker the safer fight, which clearly most experts would agree fighting Parker is safer than fighting Ortiz.

Ortiz hasn't done anything in his career compared to Parker, and even saying that is an understatement.

[N/A]

Ortiz hasn't done anything in his career compared to Parker, and even saying that is an understatement.

That you for your opinion. All of the world's leading experts rate Ortiz higher than Parker and Ortiz would be a clear betting favorite against Parker. I don't argue opinions. If for some reason you believe Parker would beat Ortiz, good for you.

[LacedUp]

That you for your opinion. All of the world's leading experts rate Ortiz higher than Parker and Ortiz would be a clear betting favorite against Parker. I don't argue opinions. If for some reason you believe Parker would beat Ortiz, good for you.

That’s not an opinion, it is a fact. World champion, multiple defenses, better amateur and did it all in fewer fights than Ortiz.

[buddyguns]

I'm not entirely sure what logic this thread could possibly hold. Whyte is getting a title shot in April, so why discuss him vs. Wilder? After he loses to AJ, he'll be back on the rebuilding train. At the end of the day this thread only serves the purpose of feeding NSB posters internal emotional struggles.