Comments Thread For: Hearn: Joshua Would Like Wilder, But No Interest in Time Waster

[Noelanthony]

Not quite sure...

Maybe change your name and start afresh in some far off land?

Fighthype.com far enough for you?

[b00g13man]

Fighthype.com far enough for you?

Maybe. Maybe not.

[P to the J]

[QUOTE=Lemonhead_Jeff;19057038]Boy, the way Glenn Miller played!
Songs that made the Hit Parade.
Guys like us, we had it made.
Those were the days.

I could hear the 'All in the Family' theme song in my head
as I read your amusing rant.[/QUOTE

Haha.
Did I mention there were fields? As far as the eye could see...

[P to the J]

Bs.. Athletes are bigger, faster, and stronger than fighters back in the days.. so u don't know.. plus, drug testing!

I take your point. It’s tough to compare but I just don’t rate this bunch.
For every advance in drugs testing tech, there’s an advance in drug evasion tech.

[P to the J]

True but Wilder can also KO Joshua in three. Can not will goes both ways.

Joshua has a better skill set. That much is obvious (is it?) It’s hypothetical but as everyone always says, you back a boxer over a puncher, right?
Wilder COULD KO Joshua in one. He’s hunting all night for that punch though and against an AJ - also bigger, stronger and fitter than anyone he has ever faced - his percentages decrease big time in my opinion.

[IMDAZED]

Joshua has a better skill set. That much is obvious (is it?) It’s hypothetical but as everyone always says, you back a boxer over a puncher, right?
Wilder COULD KO Joshua in one. He’s hunting all night for that punch though and against an AJ - also bigger, stronger and fitter than anyone he has ever faced - his percentages decrease big time in my opinion.

I pick Joshua to beat Wilder, but only if he attacks. Too robotic to try and box Wilder for 12 rounds.

[slu]

when I say scared, I mean given ALL of these guys have huge flaws they want to hold on to belts as long as possible and Wilder with knock out power is unpredictable because of the right hand. Of course your right, Wilder will lose to someone for sure, they all will I'd guess. The trainer I spoke with who's heavyweight fought AJ, basically said look, AJ doesn't scare us, Wilder's skill's don't scare us at all, but he can clunk you out of nowhere with that right and that's it. So your right, if you had a truly well rounded heavyweight you wouldn't be scared at all, but I guess there really aren't any well rounded Heavyweights so power is a problem these guys can't really solve for. Good points btw....

[Real King Kong]

nope

it is the guy who demanded 50mil..... got it..... but then refused it

and, he just so happens to be the very same guy who offered a blatant lowball..... got it..... and then BIZARRELY refused that as well

come on man, keep fighting the good fight lol

the 50 mil was just a stunt. we're lucky wilder vs fury looks to be happening. it'll force hearn's hand to give wilder a split and maybe wilder will stop pricing himself out. but nah...we'll probably hear 50/50 or no fight.

[5000boxing]

I take your point. It’s tough to compare but I just don’t rate this bunch.
For every advance in drugs testing tech, there’s an advance in drug evasion tech.

This is why the best is suppose to fight the best.. in there prime so the lineal championship can always keep the bar high.. so, based on the current batch of heavyweights Wilder is the best of the bunch.

[Nino250ex]

Unfortunately for the most part boxing went from fighting to see who the best was multiple times if needed to The fighter getting the highest amount of money is automatically the best and the opponent doesn’t want to prove they are better unless they are making the same amount of $