Comments Thread For: Wilder: Joshua Damaged Name in U.S., I'll KO Fury in Mid-Rounds

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • kafkod
    I am Fanboy. Very Fanboy
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2013
    • 24774
    • 2,182
    • 1,798
    • 405,373

    #161
    Originally posted by Raggamuffin
    All you know is that a contract was sent. That's all you know. You don't know what was on it, the date or where the fight was. Just stfu lmao.
    I know that Wilder is bitching and complaining because AJ's signature wasn't on his contract, and I know that is bullshit.

    There is no reason at all for AJ to sign his opponent's contract.

    Now you STFU fool, because you have no idea what you are talking about, as usual.

    Comment

    • Raggamuffin
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Aug 2016
      • 8195
      • 453
      • 961
      • 43,263

      #162
      Originally posted by kafkod
      I know that Wilder is bitching and complaining because AJ's signature wasn't on his contract, and I know that is bullshit.

      There is no reason at all for AJ to sign his opponent's contract.

      Now you STFU fool, because you have no idea what you are talking about, as usual.
      Nobody believes any of you mofos when you defend Joshua. He's a gutless ****** when it comes to someone that he can't bully. And you don't know **** about boxing contracts. You just Googled your info lmao. Why you defend that ***** made ***** is beyond me.

      Comment

      • Ake-Dawg
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Jun 2016
        • 5510
        • 127
        • 80
        • 76,361

        #163
        Originally posted by kafkod
        I know that Wilder is bitching and complaining because AJ's signature wasn't on his contract, and I know that is bullshit.

        There is no reason at all for AJ to sign his opponent's contract.

        Now you STFU fool, because you have no idea what you are talking about, as usual.
        Why did Hearn himself say that Joshua didn't sign anything. Interesting video. Hearn dodges the split question. Basically says...the fight would be on DAZN thus only a flat fee can be offered.

        Seems to me like Hearn wants to use Wilder to build DAZN. Thus the flat fees and the offers for Whyte and Chisora. I bet you those two offers are contingent on Wilder accepting the flat fee Joshua deal.

        https://********/aqdxUkMVcyw

        Comment

        • 5000boxing
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Nov 2017
          • 2920
          • 131
          • 0
          • 41,468

          #164
          Originally posted by SeGoodland
          Oh wow, yeah cause you really know what you are talking about! well done for proving you’re a dumbass.
          Lmao! Seriously.. tap out hoe!. I will rip ur fu cking arm off!

          Comment

          • kafkod
            I am Fanboy. Very Fanboy
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Sep 2013
            • 24774
            • 2,182
            • 1,798
            • 405,373

            #165
            Originally posted by Raggamuffin
            Nobody believes any of you mofos when you defend Joshua. He's a gutless ****** when it comes to someone that he can't bully. And you don't know **** about boxing contracts. You just Googled your info lmao. Why you defend that ***** made ***** is beyond me.
            Lol .. such an angry child. Does your mummy know you swear at adults on line?

            Comment

            • kafkod
              I am Fanboy. Very Fanboy
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Sep 2013
              • 24774
              • 2,182
              • 1,798
              • 405,373

              #166
              Originally posted by Ake-Dawg
              Why did Hearn himself say that Joshua didn't sign anything. Interesting video. Hearn dodges the split question. Basically says...the fight would be on DAZN thus only a flat fee can be offered.

              Seems to me like Hearn wants to use Wilder to build DAZN. Thus the flat fees and the offers for Whyte and Chisora. I bet you those two offers are contingent on Wilder accepting the flat fee Joshua deal.

              https://********/aqdxUkMVcyw
              Hearn says he owns AJ's promotional rights, so he would sign the contract on behalf of Matchroom Sports. The interviewer then says he knows that's how it works because he's seen other fight contracts.

              I think, like you say, the Whyte and Chisora offers were part of a package, linked with the flat fee for fighting AJ.

              I'm not saying Wilder should accept that deal. He might earn more for fighting Fury, and if he beats Fury, he would be able to get a better deal for the AJ fight.

              All I'm saying is that there's no reason at all why AJ's signature should have been on Wilder's contract, and Wilder is just trying to score PR points by pretending that the contract would be no good unless AJ signed it.

              Comment

              • lizard_man
                Undisputed Champion
                • Jul 2008
                • 2594
                • 368
                • 20
                • 48,631

                #167
                Hold on. Let me get this straight. According to the AJ fans, AJ doesn't need to sign the contract but wilder does. Since wilder didn't sign the contract he's ducking. AJ doesn't have to only eddie Hearn does. Do i have this right? Lmao

                This is the first time I've heard where a boxer doesn't need to sign to fight lmao

                Comment

                • lizard_man
                  Undisputed Champion
                  • Jul 2008
                  • 2594
                  • 368
                  • 20
                  • 48,631

                  #168
                  Today i learned that boxers don't sign contracts. Only promoters do. Lmao

                  This is what the AJ fans are saying

                  Comment

                  • Raggamuffin
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Aug 2016
                    • 8195
                    • 453
                    • 961
                    • 43,263

                    #169
                    Originally posted by lizard_man
                    Today i learned that boxers don't sign contracts. Only promoters do. Lmao

                    This is what the AJ fans are saying
                    Lmmfao rotf lol...

                    Comment

                    • Ake-Dawg
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Jun 2016
                      • 5510
                      • 127
                      • 80
                      • 76,361

                      #170
                      Originally posted by kafkod
                      Hearn says he owns AJ's promotional rights, so he would sign the contract on behalf of Matchroom Sports. The interviewer then says he knows that's how it works because he's seen other fight contracts.

                      I think, like you say, the Whyte and Chisora offers were part of a package, linked with the flat fee for fighting AJ.

                      I'm not saying Wilder should accept that deal. He might earn more for fighting Fury, and if he beats Fury, he would be able to get a better deal for the AJ fight.

                      All I'm saying is that there's no reason at all why AJ's signature should have been on Wilder's contract, and Wilder is just trying to score PR points by pretending that the contract would be no good unless AJ signed it.
                      Ok. I think that there are many who understand the Hearn signing for Joshua perspective but dislike the fact that Hearn and Joshua used misleading language for effect (particularly with casuals). The sending of a signed contract is publicity stunt, given that Hearn knew before sending it that the agreed upon terms for a 2018 fight were not agreeable for a April 2019 fight. Further, including language that says the contract is null after 22Sept only makes the move questionable at best. No one should expect any deal to be signed before the Joshua Povetkin contest is over.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP