how come wilders so highly rated all of a sudden?
Collapse
-
-
Povetkin is a walk through and you know it. AJ is nowhere near as good a boxer as Usyk so that comparison is not a very good one.Comment
-
The wlad win was solid, but it was after fury beat him, do not forget.
The AJ show can go on but if it does and he hasn't defeated Wilder or Fury he will not get the respect he craves, especially with the way he gave Povetkin, Takam and Parker offers they'd easily accept but played games with Wilder.
Tell English Rid**** to step up. .
You have to admit that Wladimir did not fight Fury the same way that he fought Joshua. We haven't seen Klitschko fight like that in a decade.Comment
-
High risk, low reward. Although we may ridicule Wilder's style, he has twice the fights that Joshua has & a crazy high KO ratio. That's the high risk. However, since all but one of those wins is against a slew of bums, Wilder is not a big draw. That's the low reward.Comment
-
I really don't have a problem with the fight happening next year.Comment
-
in all fairness, aj isn't a southpaw and doesn't have the footwork/movement that usyk has and wilder, is more athletic/explosive than gassiev...aj is gonna get hit at some point. but yea, the safe bet in that fight is similar to the usk vs gassiev fight.Comment
-
yeah, obviously very different fighters but more often than not in these type of fights at the top level, that one big fight changing shot never lands. if people think joshuas going to come forward with his chin hanging out then they are deluded, he'll be defensive and cagey like he was against parkerComment
-
... what's to guess about?... Hearn has the younger fighter -- who brings the money on the table, and who holds lower risk money fights ahead...Comment
Comment