Yeah the $50 million offer...
Collapse
-
-
No dummy you have to go to the actual video not cut and paste what you want .
Wouldnt the scared one be the guy actually demanding 50 % and a guaranteed rematch ?
Last edited by juggernaut666; 07-14-2018, 11:24 AM.Comment
-
Hearn & Finkel argued for months over how much more the fight would do in the US vs the UK. Team AJ was convinced Finkel was full of **** about the fight doing 100 million in the US. Said AJ said, if it really does that much, give me 50 and I'll sign tomorrow. So Finkel said, ok, here's your 50.Comment
-
After passing on the 50 mil offer it should be obvious that team Joshua was never really interested in a Wilder fight. Hopefully that changes.Comment
-
I feel a responsibility to address this thread because, even though i'm not a Wilder fanboy (i even sided with AJ initially in regards to the $50million offer), i have been throwing around the reality that AJ is the one leaving the most money (and better deal) on the side by not accepting Wilder's offer.
Here's the thing, AJ has the right to do whatever he wants, i'm not really profiting from either side so in all honesty i don't really care. But when Hearn and AJ fanboys want to make it look like Wilder didn't want this fight next well... that's just straight up hating and intellectually dishonest. It doesn't even matter if the fight happens next year and AJ wins, his team didn't want this fight now and their counter offers show it. It's actually comparable to Mayweather-Pacquiao. Even though the fight eventually happened with testing and Mayweather won, that will never change (in my eyes at least) the fact Mayweather started the whole random blood testing charade as an obstacle to not really have the fight with Pacquiao at his peak. However, i digress... the way i see it, AJ and his team had 2 options if they really wanted the fight next:
1. Play along with the $50million minimum offer until a legitimate show stopper was identified or;
2. Offer Wilder a respectable purse split. One that acknowledges Wilder's standing as the 2nd best heavyweight and shows respect to the very generous offer AJ was offered to cross the pond.
But instead, all we got were publicity wars filled with flat fees and questionable drama involving one of the least strick sanctioning bodies in the sport. Think about it...Comment
-
See, this actually makes sense, and you see the greed from stakeholders of the event gettimg in the way.Hearn and AJ want to control the worldwide TV rights, which they wouldn't if they accepted the $50m.
I'm sure AJ would accept $50m purse in theory, who wouldn't? - but Hearn especially knows his cut of that purse is probably not as big as the cut he could make if he controls TV rights. That's why they're making flat fee offers to Wilder too.
$50m sounds a lot, it is, but Hearn's cut isn't enough for him. He wants to own the show. That way even if AJ earns less than the 50m...Hearn still earns more.
You can't just look at a big round figure and focus on that. You have to realise how the other people involved make their money and how stipulations affect their cut.Comment
-
AJ didn't change his mind. He just said a ****** thing. He didn't think the fight can make 100m, at least not sure enough to guarantee the funds. So he said "yeah if you give me 50m I'll take it immediately" as a way to shut wilder up. And it backfired. They quickly realized that Joshua makes 20-30m easy from random fights, and it's ****** to give up all the A side advantages for 20-30% more.
I'm regards to the offer, I don't know how real it was as no details were ever confirmed. But I have my own doubts, logically speaking. The chief of which is that we know for sure that wilder agreed to take 15m to fight Joshua in the UK. If the 50m offer was real without any funny business, why in the blue hell would he ever take it? He didn't take povetkin for 3m and waited for 7, he didn't take Whyte for 6-7m, but all of a sudden he's gonna take an offer that's a third of what he was offering, and to fight in the UK while complaining about giving up all advantages?
I just don't buy that the offer was legit enough without anything funky. Especially with that random 24 hour deadline they have Hearn.
The dumber wilder fan boys keep whining about hearns offer not specifying where and when, even though he's on record discussing it, and it's obvious to anyone. Yet Wilders magical 50m offer didn't have a ton details at all, and was given with a completely artificial 24 hour deadline during which they refused to communicate and meet.
I respect both guys, and want to see them fight. But there's a clear difference between their teams. At best, Hearn was honest and frustrated. At worst, he's a really good liar and can spin things well. Finkle on the other hand, is an imbecile no matter how you look at him. He's not believable and his statements are either false or make no sense.Comment
-
Comment
-
Multiple people replied and quoted you. You must have missed my post and all the others
What's wrong with it is that some see it as part of a pattern of delaying and time wasting from the AJ side. You can make a thread on each delay being uniquely justified but eventually have to accept that the time adds up. Because Hearn ended negotiations saying 'we ran out of time, Povetkin mandatory ordered now' the time wasted by AJ changing his mind matters.
You got 2 possible ways of looking at it. If you're considering if AJ wanted to waste time so the fight couldn't get made, him offering a low flat fee, then requesting a high fee to go to US, then saying he wants it in the UK certainly worked well. Second way of seeing it is that AJ really wanted to make the fight and did his honest best, but even that you still have to admit that changing his mind one way and then the other might have been the reason Hearn/Wilder's side ran out of time to close the deal.
So either way, yeah he's allowed to change his mind but when the consequence of that is running out of time to make the fight happen, of course there will be a lot of fans criticising.Comment

Comment