Even the Brits admit Wilder has the most Prestigious belt

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Lopez_Boxing
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jan 2017
    • 4655
    • 245
    • 81
    • 97,428

    #61
    Originally posted by Songbird
    for the wbc to be any better u would have to have the "better" boxers targeting it and holding it and not bothering with the other belts, ive never heard someone say well this guy was a double world champ, well actually this guy was a wbc champ, so there!!!! who wins that obvious is it not, or is it p
    Mayweather only fought for the wbc. Didn’t even take Shane’s belts when he won. He’s as a “better” boxer as they get. I thought it’s was already widely know the green belt was the most prestigious

    Comment

    • SUBZER0ED
      Be water, my friend.
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Feb 2013
      • 11346
      • 2,532
      • 1,954
      • 34,667

      #62
      Wilder has stated that he wants to unify, therefore to him, his WBC belt alone is not enough. He will be challenging for Joshua's 4 belts. He will not be able command a 50-50 split as a challenger who holds 1 belt, despite its "prestige".

      Comment

      • MUNG
        Death Dealer
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • May 2009
        • 4183
        • 438
        • 79
        • 31,567

        #63
        Originally posted by Lopez_Boxing
        Mayweather only fought for the wbc. Didn’t even take Shane’s belts when he won. He’s as a “better” boxer as they get. I thought it’s was already widely know the green belt was the most prestigious
        mayweather also said belts are only good for collecting dust, including the wbc i presume

        Comment

        • N/A
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Jul 2017
          • 9269
          • 214
          • 0
          • 12

          #64
          Originally posted by Songbird
          "We want to make the fight very much and we'd love to make the fight with them on a 50-50 deal," Duva told ESPN.com. "But Sergey is contractually tied to HBO and we can't go to a purse bid. We can't fight the fight if we lose the bid, so there's no point in going to the bid and putting on charade."

          About the stevenson fight:

          That seems to be the explanation of why kovalev pulled out, whats going on here do you know?

          Duva used the Stevenson fight as leverage to get HBO to increase their offer for a new TV deal. Then ducked the Stevenson fight to go sign another contract with HBO instead.

          Comment

          • Lopez_Boxing
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jan 2017
            • 4655
            • 245
            • 81
            • 97,428

            #65
            Originally posted by Songbird
            mayweather also said belts are only good for collecting dust, including the wbc i presume
            HE held the wbc until retirement

            Comment

            • MUNG
              Death Dealer
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • May 2009
              • 4183
              • 438
              • 79
              • 31,567

              #66
              Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF
              Duva used the Stevenson fight as leverage to get HBO to increase their offer for a new TV deal. Then ducked the Stevenson fight to go sign another contract with HBO instead.
              So you are saying that kovalev ducked stevenson and got a better tv deal out of doing it?

              How did the stevenson fight twist hbos arm to give them a better deal?

              Comment

              • N/A
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Jul 2017
                • 9269
                • 214
                • 0
                • 12

                #67
                Originally posted by Songbird
                So you are saying that kovalev ducked stevenson and got a better tv deal out of doing it?
                correct.


                How did the stevenson fight twist hbos arm to give them a better deal?
                hbo knew haymon would win the purse bid and take the fight to showtime.

                had kovalev won the fight, he could have gone back to hbo with more leverage than ever and gotten an even better contract.

                but had kovalev lost the fight, he'd have no leverage with hbo whatsoever and would have ended up with no deal at all, or a greatly reduced deal.

                the safe decision was to duck the fight and resign with hbo. i would have done the same thing.

                but when fans want to assign blame for the fight not happening, the bottom line is that stevenson was willing to risk everything and kovalev wasnt. had stevenson lost and kovalev returned to hbo, showtime wouldnt have been interested in stevenson anymore.

                it would have been a cash out fight where the winner was in the ultimate position and the loser was ****ed. stevenson was willing to take that risk. kovalev wasnt.

                Comment

                • MUNG
                  Death Dealer
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • May 2009
                  • 4183
                  • 438
                  • 79
                  • 31,567

                  #68
                  Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF
                  it would have been a cash out fight where the winner was in the ultimate position and the loser was ****ed. stevenson was willing to take that risk. kovalev wasnt.
                  So you are basically saying that kovalev was given everything he wanted, the shot v stevenson, the cash, the whole lot, he didnt accept it to get a better contract with hbo and not only that, he then went on to publicly call him chickerson multiple times when asked about a future clash giving the impression that stevenson was the cause of the failure of the fight.

                  Jeez, i dont know, it just doesnt sound great to me, stevenson went on to fight bums once a year in canada until his last fight and kovalev is travelling here and there fighting good opponents, its an odd one

                  Comment

                  • N/A
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Jul 2017
                    • 9269
                    • 214
                    • 0
                    • 12

                    #69
                    Originally posted by Songbird
                    So you are basically saying that kovalev was given everything he wanted, the shot v stevenson, the cash, the whole lot, he didnt accept it to get a better contract with hbo and not only that, he then went on to publicly call him chickerson multiple times when asked about a future clash giving the impression that stevenson was the cause of the failure of the fight.
                    Correct.


                    Jeez, i dont know, it just doesnt sound great to me, stevenson went on to fight bums once a year in canada until his last fight and kovalev is travelling here and there fighting good opponents, its an odd one
                    Showtime pays more than HBO. Stevenson is making more than Kovalev. But Kovalev has the safety of guaranteed dates. Whereas had he fought Stevenson and lost, he risked neither premium network wanting him as a featured fighter anymore.

                    Comment

                    • Laligalaliga
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Mar 2018
                      • 6439
                      • 71
                      • 11
                      • 90,109

                      #70
                      Originally posted by _Rexy_
                      well, clearly you're new to the sport, since you picked a belt that nobody has tried to win, nobody has tried to defend, and you likely don't know a single HW IBO champ other than AJ. It's a throw in title, it's not a recognized world title. I'm happy you think it's the most prestigious title, but you're wrong. It's not a matter of opinion.

                      Ever heard of Kevin Lerena? No? He's the IBO Crusierweight Champion.

                      Heard of Igor Mikhalkin? I'm sure you have. He just got his ass kicked by Krusher. Surprisingly, the match was only for Kovalevs WBO strap. Kov didn't care about your prestigious IBO belt

                      Tsiko Mulovhedzi is the IBO Welterweight Champion of the world. He's the 55th ranked WW in the world, and has a record of 12-8


                      See a trend? Sure there are a few "names" who hold the IBO (AJ, GGG, Hurd) but for the most part, it's C level fighters. And the "names" who have won it, just won a vacant throw in belt when they were fighting for a different title (AJ won it when he was competing for the WBA it was a vacant throw in title, GGG won it vacant, Hurd won it while competing for the WBA and IBO)

                      By your logic the WBC Silver belt is higher ranked than the WBC World title because you think Whyte > Wilder.


                      EDIT - Karo Murat is the IBO Light Heavyweight Champion. He won the vacant title a few months ago, and nobody even noticed.
                      You have made some decent points about IBO that tends to push them backward.
                      What will you say about the other 3 belts?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP