Comments Thread For: Wilder: Joshua Wanted One-Way Rematch Clause, to Pick Officials

[IMDAZED]

Link for what? I told you to check what Hearn confirm on video. So if Hearn was lying it’s clearly on video. Which can be debunked by Shelly.

You would have to provide the link. Because I watched the one hour plus long IFL interview and he didn’t say anything about paper.

[uppercut510]

A REAL fan would want the fighter to sign the contract he AGREED too and stop bringing up 50 Million fallicies that have nothing to do with the 15 Million AGREED terms that Wilder AGREED too , so the fight would be put in play !

Of course you keep insinuating you dont care about money but you use it as an excuse daily on here why Wilder is getting low balled even though that is B.S as well !!

if wilder takes a flat fee I wouldn't care that's on him, but the terms of this contract for april 2019 are terrible, I wouldn't sign that mess. what if aj loses to pedvtkin? wilder is still locked into this contract for april. maybe if it was next it would make sense but only a rematch if aj loses, if wilder loses aj has the option not to fight him? no showtime, and hearn gets to pick the ref and judges? I understand you are a possessed hearn fanatic but why do you agree with this?

is aj pedvtkin signed? why hasn't aj been stripped by the WBA?

[j0zef]

Why is he whining about this? A side gets the rematch, B side doesn't. Always the case.

Canelo had a one sided rematch clause even though he had no belts.

[Ray*]

You would have to provide the link. Because I watched the one hour plus long IFL interview and he didn’t say anything about paper.

Whether it’s on paper, email, fax Shelly knew what was going on.

[uppercut510]

Whether it’s on paper, email, fax Shelly knew what was going on.

brother ray you cant just pull things out based on your emotion.

[uppercut510]

Why is he whining about this? A side gets the rematch, B side doesn't. Always the case.

Canelo had a one sided rematch clause even though he had no belts.

seems to me that hearn said one thing and different terms were in the contract sent. either that or team wilder openly agreed to these terms and then rejected them when they got the contract. which do u think happened?

[uppercut510]

Link for what? I told you to check what Hearn confirm on video. So if Hearn was lying it’s clearly on video. Which can be debunked by Shelly.

hearn would never lie

[Ray*]

brother ray you cant just pull things out based on your emotion.

Zero emotion. I think most American poster on here have invested too much emotion into this. They question everything that doesn’t go Wilder way. I personally couldn’t careless if things doesn’t go AJ way. You want everyone to believe Shelly but not believe Hearn. You have brits calling Hearn a liar but you would find it hard to see a few American poster who would call Shelly the same. Like I have maintained all along if both teams want this fight then it could have been sorted out instead of fighting over money.

[Ray*]

hearn would never lie

According to you American posters maybe. Us over here nah. You guys are the ones taking Shelly word for it. If Hearn is lying on video then it’s easily debunked by Shelly (Who hasn’t been shy with the media).

[uppercut510]

Zero emotion. I think most American poster on here have invested too much emotion into this. They question everything that doesn’t go Wilder way. I personally couldn’t careless if things doesn’t go AJ way. You want everyone to believe Shelly but not believe Hearn. You have brits calling Hearn a liar but you would find it had to see a few American poster who would call Shelly the same. Like I have maintained all along if both teams want this fight then it could have been sorted out instead of fighting over money.

that's not true, most of us accept hes the b side and him accepting a low ball but you have to admit hearn is on some b\s with the contract stipulations. but ok has the aj pedvtkin fight been made/signed? why hasn't aj been stripped of his wba title? what happened to the 24 hours or be stripped?