he did everything to make the fight yet he turned it down cause he didnt get a rematch clause. i dont think you know what doing everything means. pretty standard and you couldnt even agree to that. mind bobbling
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Wilder: Joshua Wanted One-Way Rematch Clause, to Pick Officials
Collapse
-
Load of bull**** seen it all before with floyd v pac negotiations
Both sides weighed up the projected numbers and likely agreed they can drag it out to get more buys all this back and forth is just hype to make you hate one side or the other and get you emotionally invested enough to buy a PPV zzz wake me up when its announced
Still I will laugh hard if povetkin ko's joshua stiff in their fight
Comment
-
Yeah Wilder turned down no rematch clause, Joshua turned down the 50 million. I hope he never lives it down. Bottom line is Joshua doesn't get **** for being an entitled Brit anymore. Understand the man is a hype job.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Vae Victis View PostThe side B argument went out the window once Joshua rejected Wilder's fifty million dollar guarantee (as Joshua was not the fighter bringing the big money to the fight). And as Wilder is an undefeated champion the contract must have a rematch clause either way. For Wilder to sign the contract without a cause granting him an instant rematch if he lost would be tantamount to saying that he was not a champion - that he did not hold a title. Hearn wrote a contract that Wilder had to reject, so don't be surprised that he did.
The same way there was only a rematch clause in place for Canelo/ggg if ggg won, no one complained about that this is the same thing. Ggg was an undefeated champion too but that doesn’t mean you aren’t the b side.
Comment
-
Originally posted by True That View PostReminds me of the Canelo-Golovkin deal.
Canelo had a rematch clause if he lost, Golovkin didn't have a rematch clause if he lost.
Lucky for us, the fight was made anyway.
Comment
-
Originally posted by EnglishOxide View Post1. Wilder agreed to no rematch for him when requesting the contract. Fact.
2. Finkel stated that he was ready to sign the contract WITHOUT a rematch clause for Wilder. Fact.
3. The 50m offer to AJ did NOT include a rematch clause for either fighter. Fact.
Summary? Wilder talking **** and lying to his cult again.
Hearn admitted the fight wouldn't be for 10 months, so Wilder didn't sign.
He's listing reasons for why the deal was unfair, one of which is the rematch, but that doesn't change the fact that he was willing to sign the unfair deal as long as the fight was NEXT.
Comment
-
This fight is not a 100m fight if it's next.
So the ratios people are claiming are whack.
Wilder has picked on odd excuses.
The local commissions set the refs and judges. In any case, does Wilder really think it'll go to points.
Crucially he already accepted the contract verbally and on social media, did he not?
Comment
-
Originally posted by BoZz View PostIf I was wilder i wouldn't even be chasing that coward anymore....what has aj done to make all the decisions? He beat a fkn old klitschko where he nearly got knocked out and thinks he's mike tyson now lol....in every fight he looks gassed out slow and robotic...bum ass fighter...i know wilder isn't much better but at least the dude wants to fight....aj is the biggest fraud i swear...well time to move on these dude's are getting boring..wilder should just give up chasing that bum
Comment
Comment