Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Wilder: Joshua Wanted One-Way Rematch Clause, to Pick Officials

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    Once Wilder steps in the ring with AJ it's going to be Mike Tyson vs Michael Spinks revisited. AJ is afraid to death of Deontay Wilder's punching power. Just as Michael Spinks was afraid Mike Tyson's punching power.

    Everyone believes that Anthony Joshua can defeat Deontay Wilder except for Anthony Joshua himself. He is not confident as all that he can defeat Deontay Wilder, that is why there is no fight happening this year. He fears that is 0 might go.
    Last edited by champion4ever; 07-02-2018, 05:04 PM.

    Comment


    • #52
      AJ is a coward

      Wilder called AJs bluff, he offers him 50 mio $ guaranteed, AJ says he does not need the money, he offers him to go to his country for a lot less money, AJ says no rematch clause, no referee input no nothing.... AJ did everything he could to dodge this fight.
      Wilder should move on, he is the WBC HW champion of the world, it is the most prestigious belt, he does not need AJ, Wilder called their bluff!

      Comment


      • #53
        Originally posted by Stinger1 View Post
        It's standard B side terms. Same ones Parker agreed to and he was a champion too. There has never been a more delusional B side in the history of boxing.
        Exactly, I just don't get Wilder and his bunch of delusional fans.

        AJ has all the belts and generates all the money in the fight. Wilder is the B side, if he wins which he and his fans seem to have no confidence in then he becomes the A side and the rematch is in America.

        Wilder has a chance to become the unified champion and receive about x8 his biggest ever purse and he is whinging about basic B side **** like a rematch clause or travelling to the champs back yard. Are you kidding me?

        Can you imagine if Billy Joe Saunders turned down the Canelo/Golovkin winner because he wanted the fight in Britain and wanted a rematch clause. That is the exact same situation, but it would Never happen!

        Comment


        • #54
          Originally posted by THE FACT KING View Post
          Deontay Wilder Vs Dominic Breazeale is Official. Just dropped a video on my channel.
          Wow that should amazing!!!

          Although my support for Josh has gone down over the 50m it has also for Wilder who all along was being played but could have ***ed them by taking the shyte and making them eat it.This sometimes happens in boxing and I find it difficult to think that Wilder was so close to his biggest money fight and the chance to earn even more but gave in over a rematch clause (even more money) and the officials.

          I've known all along that the snake Hearn and his pathetic old man didn't want Wilder ....A.J. would but was talked around but for me the ******ity of Wilder not taking the $20 m two fight deal and the rematch money is just beyond believe.Wilder could have picked a Amir Khan type opponent ....Hearn said he let him choose ...So $5m for free! Then $15m knock out A.J. and double it .Take the belts and let Hearn beg

          BUT Wilder like a twat is more bothered by what the other guys making and ******ly don't or can't see the big picture .

          No time for any yanks who see this differently and no time for any Englishman who do the same .In their own ways the are a pair of p**** stuck up their own arses.....*** em in fact what have they done to a prove they deserve all the commotion!

          Comment


          • #55
            Originally posted by BIGPOPPAPUMP View Post
            Deontay Wilder and his team had several problems with the most recent contract promoter Eddie Hearn sent them for a proposed heavyweight showdown with Anthony Joshua. Their primary problem was that there was only a rematch clause in the contract in the event Joshua lost. If Wilder would've won, he would've had to fight Joshua again in an immediate rematch. If Wilder would've lost, Joshua wouldn't have been contractually obligated to a rematch with him.
            [Click Here To Read More]
            It’s true that AJ is afraid of Wilder... but it’s also true that Wilder does not make 15 Million or even 8-10 million against anybody else but AJ. Wilder needs AJ financially more than AJ needs him.

            Comment


            • #56
              Originally posted by EnglishOxide View Post
              A sides and B sides have always existed in boxing. Don't pretend it doesn't just because it suits the American in this argument.

              If you think holding titles is a barometer of how fighters should be paid then the whole deal should be 75/25 seeing as Joshua has 3 and Wilder has 1.

              Do you think Victor Ortiz was paid more than Mayweather for defending his WBC title when Mayweather brought no titles to the fight?

              Do you think Cotto was paid more than Mayweather when he defended his WBA title when Mayweather brought more titles to the show?

              Hell no.
              He isn’t asking for more he is asking for more than the pittance being offered. Both Hearn and Joshua knows offering 15 mil on a 100 mil fight is hilarity that cannot be made up. Hearn is a carnival barking used car clown show snake oil salesman. His DAZN is already going to sink due to lack of boxers joining and his side kick Robin doesn’t want Wilder. Isn’t it funny how we don’t hear from the man himself? That’s typically what happens in a relationship, the butch speaks for both

              Comment


              • #57
                Why would Wilder get a rematch clause ?

                Yes it’s a unification fight, but in the grand scheme of things, Wilder is the challenger. Joshua has the majority of the belts, is a much bigger draw, and is almost universally ranked as the no.1 in the division.

                Comment


                • #58
                  Originally posted by techliam View Post
                  Why would Wilder get a rematch clause ?

                  Yes it’s a unification fight, but in the grand scheme of things, Wilder is the challenger. Joshua has the majority of the belts, is a much bigger draw, and is almost universally ranked as the no.1 in the division.

                  In that case, neither should have a rematch clause. When you put it that way, if Wilder beats him, he’d have all of the belts and he should move on to other fighters.

                  Comment


                  • #59
                    Originally posted by techliam View Post
                    Why would Wilder get a rematch clause ?

                    Yes it’s a unification fight, but in the grand scheme of things, Wilder is the challenger. Joshua has the majority of the belts, is a much bigger draw, and is almost universally ranked as the no.1 in the division.
                    Incorrect, there is no #1 in the division. That is decided as the lineal champion and there isn’t one. It was vacated by Tyson Fury. Wilder is not the challenger, it is an open title up for grabs

                    Comment


                    • #60
                      Wilder may be the B side, Joshua is the P side.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP