Comments Thread For: Wilder Erupts on Joshua: I Smell P*ssy, You Coward Ass B*tch!

[killakali]

They never sent a crontract over cause aj wouldn’t verbally agree to fight him

Lol. Smh. Lol. They sent an email b fire anything was verbally agreed too

[Bobby Deez]

I smells it too...

[kafkod]

Hearn did everything he could to make the fight, but Wilder clearly didn't want it. Let him go back to fighting cans and mouthing off on social media. Seems like that's all he's good for.

[SchoolTheseCats]

So Joshua's a pvssy for fighting the guy Wilder ducked LOL?

Wilder ducked pedvetkin?? Or did he pop dirty got caught had fight canceled got a second chance and popped dirty again very next fight he signed to take...

[Sid-Knee]

what offer did Wilder agree to?

The offer that Wilder took 4 weeks to agree to.

[juggernaut666]

So I guess, by your logic, Anthony Joshua definitely didn't think he could win, since his rematch clause was certainly on the contract.


Gotcha!

ps. You didn't think that one out very well, did ya?

Joshua is the UNIFIED champion generating the money so he deserves a rematch .

The FACT you admitted Wilder had cause for concern on a rematch tells me why he didnt sign and thats bc he has severe doubts ,otherwise he knocks Joshua out and makes 50 plus Million in a rematch . lol

Yea it takes a real genius to out think you ?


Anyway know wonder your posts are biased trash with no common sense bc your just parroting off him .

[Sid-Knee]

So I guess, by your logic, Anthony Joshua definitely didn't think he could win, since his rematch clause was certainly on the contract.


Gotcha!

ps. You didn't think that one out very well, did ya?

Not really because it's common practice that the A side gets a rematch clause just in case. You don't just hand over all you've worked for because you want to appear tough. That would be silly.

[travestyny]

So Joshua's a pvssy for fighting the guy Wilder ducked LOL?

Oh yea. That had nothing to do with his opponent being popped for roids. Wilder was just in Russia for a vacation. I forgot about that! :-|

[Bad_Guy]

You're guessing? Or just being biased and making bull**** up?

Anything to back up what you're saying?

I guess you don't know what the word guessing means.

[Iamsmoke89]

Finkle had 2 questions that needed answering. Eddie answered those questions so it was to Finkle's liking. If there was something in the contract that wasn't already discussed and agreed upon, Finkle sure a shell would have said so. But he didn't. So we take from that, that the contract was legit as they had agreed.

Is there any rational thought from you that the contract was bogus and not what they had agreed? I'm all ears.

If your’re right he answered those questions. Which means it wasn’t in the contract causing them to raise concern which also means contract would have to be redone right?