Originally posted by juggernaut666
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Wilder Erupts on Joshua: I Smell P*ssy, You Coward Ass B*tch!
Collapse
-
It's so hard to cheer for a guy so clearly winning via being a human chemical experiment like joshua. He's just a "meh" boxer but looks like a freak who couldn't exist even 20 years ago.
I hope wilder puts him down so he can ease up on the steroids and do commercials in japan or something. That's what Bob Sapp did.
Wilder is a much more presentable boxing champion. Yeah I know they're probably all on something and the testing is a joke but there's no need to advertise it to the point of satire.Last edited by ////; 06-26-2018, 09:51 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sid-Knee View PostWhen did Hearn waste time? It was Wilder who took 4 weeks to accept the offer even though they knew the WBA was waiting in the wings ready to force a mandatory. So how in the hell is that AJ's fault?
All I see on this forum is crazy people, man.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by BufordTannen View Posteveryone knows aj and hearn are terrified, only people that think otherwise are low IQ brits
Which fighter didn’t come to Cardiff?
Which fighter refused to meet in New York?
Which fighter took A ****ING MONTH to reply to an offer?
Which fighter took over a week to NOT sign a contract?
You’re a ****ing idiot if you can’t spot which camp is acting like pros trying to get it done and which one looks like a lil’ ***** dissing her ex on social media.
America: home of ****** cvnts who voted a human rights abuser into power. In 2017. FFS, laughing stockLast edited by Froch_uppercut; 06-26-2018, 09:31 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by killakali View Postthe 50 mil offer didn’t have a date eitherLast edited by Iamsmoke89; 06-26-2018, 09:31 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sid-Knee View PostHearn wouldn't dare to play around if Wilder signed. It would have shown him to be untrustworthy. The fight would have happened by the end of the year. AJ wouldn't have fought somebody else in-between. So lets not pretend that would be the case.
Originally posted by Sid-Knee View PostDeontay shouldn't get a rematch clause if he loses. He's the B side. B side never get to have rematch clauses, only the A side. And where are you hearing this from anyway?
If something changed, Finkle would have gone to the press and said so. The fact he hasn't shows the contract to be legit in my eyes.
I'm not saying I disagree with you. I'm saying it seems to have been something that caught Wilder off guard. He seems to be saying it here at the 5:00 mark....
I could see it both ways. As champions, both should get a rematch. However, my point was why did this seem like it took Wilder by surprise.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sid-Knee View PostYou don't sign a contract because it has no date? That's Wilder's reasoning for not signing? Are you kidding me? The date and venue would have been given in no more than 2 weeks if Deontay had signed.
What does Deontay lose by signing a contract with no date? We all know Eddie was talking Oct/Nov time. And we all know that the venue pretty much would have been the stadium in Cardiff where he fought Parker. So not signing due to that makes no sense what so ever.
Wilder *****ed out plain and simple. I knew these were going to be the tactics from Wilder's side. Run down the clock so the WBA enforce their mandatory then Wilder comes out trying to be the tough guy by saying Joshua is afraid of him. It's all very predictable. It all went the way I said it would. It was bloody obvious what they were up to.
Comment
Comment