Prime Pacquiao vs Crawford or Spence. Who wins?

[The Big Dunn]

trying to weasel your way out, no self respect at all. i dont know who's worst, you or travesty lol. when caught in a lie, yall come up with all sorts of excuses.

Wtf are you talking about. Weasel my way out of what? Just because you are illiterate doesn’t make me a liar.

I notice you didn’t answer the question. So it’s ok to bring up margs and clottey but not Floyd or Raheem? Why?

[dibzvincent143]

Dude just stop. I didn’t veer off topic and bring up Floyd fighting Thurman and not answer the thread topic. I mentioned Floyd, as well as 3 other fighters, in the context of the TS question. Why? Because it’s relevant to discuss styles manny lost to when answering if he’d lose to these men.

To act like mentioning other fighters justifies that response is pathetic.

Thread police. Hahaha.

So like I said your rules are:

1. It’s okay for me—the big dunn—to mention floyd as long as I’ve mentioned other fighters as well.

2. It’s okay for me—the big dunn—to call up anyone who calls out Floyd here since they didn’t mention other fighters with him like I did. Even if they’re just replying to my post with Floyd in it.

Lmaooo!!

Slow clap.

[WesternChamp]

Dude your fuckin ******ed. Context matters. Raheem was heavier, taller, fast, moved great, had boxing skill and would’ve been tough for manny.

Manny didn’t fight him because he had just destroyed the guy who had just defeated manny. It’s not rocket science.

Your last paragraph is just ******.

destroyed?? he UD morales lol. pac stopped morales, not once BUT twice! lol. "destroyed"

[WesternChamp]

Wtf are you talking about. Weasel my way out of what? Just because you are illiterate doesn’t make me a liar.

I notice you didn’t answer the question. So it’s ok to bring up margs and clottey but not Floyd or Raheem? Why?

its ok to bring up anyone! as long as you dont cry when it doesnt fit your agenda. i thought i explained this to you already?

[The Big Dunn]

I already responded to this thread/to the TS in the first page— which I have mentioned to you in my previous comment. Like I said I myself mentioned Floyd as well that’s why I have no right to call up anyone who mentions him as well. But a Moran like you don’t understand that kind of point.

I thought were the ones having Trouble with English?

You were saying Manny avoided floyd and he replied Floyd would even take vacation against these guys. So both of you were off topic when it comes to mentioning Floyd.
Yet you’re calling him up for mentioning floyd when he was just responding to you.

The word is moron you fucking idiot.

My issue isn't that he mentioned floyd, it's that he mentioned floyd fighting Thurman and didn't answer the TS question. You should be able to understand that but I can see by your post that would be giving you too much credit.

Yes, you are.

Context please. I said he avoided Floyd "for so long" and "didn't fight Raheem" because the attributes they both possessed caused him trouble.

See the problem starts when you parse a piece of the post and change the context.

I know he was responding to just me-which is why I said stick to the TS topic and not veer off into "criticize Floyd because Dunn mentioned he beat Manny and my feelings got hurt".

[The Big Dunn]

that's your opinion. wanna hear mines? pac knocks him out.

so now pac is afraid to fight heavier, taller guys now?

No I don't, which is why I didn't quote any of your posts before I came in the thread.

Ok. the same response I got from another poster. I said I disagree and we ended it there. not a big deal.

So like I said your rules are:

1. It’s okay for me—the big dunn—to mention floyd as long as I’ve mentioned other fighters as well.

2. It’s okay for me—the big dunn—to call up anyone who calls out Floyd here since they didn’t mention other fighters with him like I did. Even if they’re just replying to my post with Floyd in it.

Lmaooo!!

Slow clap.

Now where did I post that? If that is what you got out of my posts then you should probably take some remedial English classes.

I only asked that he stay on topic. I think we should be able to agree that the answer wasn't about the thread.

destroyed?? he UD morales lol. pac stopped morales, not once BUT twice! lol. "destroyed"

Did you see the fight.? He destroyed Morales and didn't ko him because the one thing he lacks is power.

Of course you have no idea.

its ok to bring up anyone! as long as you dont cry when it doesnt fit your agenda. i thought i explained this to you already?

So if it's ok to bring up anyone, you shouldn't have said anything regarding my post.

[The Big Dunn]

The silver lining is if the Manny/Matthysse fight doesn't happen as some reports are suggesting, this would free Manny up to fight Crawford next.

Manny wouldn't be prime, so if they fight and he were to win, we can reasonably deduce prime Manny would defeat prime crawford.

Now if Crawford administers a brutal career ending beatdown, we'd still have questions.

[WesternChamp]

No I don't, which is why I didn't quote any of your posts before I came in the thread.

Ok. the same response I got from another poster. I said I disagree and we ended it there. not a big deal.



Now where did I post that? If that is what you got out of my posts then you should probably take some remedial English classes.

I only asked that he stay on topic. I think we should be able to agree that the answer wasn't about the thread.



Did you see the fight.? He destroyed Morales and didn't ko him because the one thing he lacks is power.

Of course you have no idea.



So if it's ok to bring up anyone, you shouldn't have said anything regarding my post.

so he didnt "destroyed" morales. outclass? yeah, destroyed? LOL!!!

[WesternChamp]

No I don't, which is why I didn't quote any of your posts before I came in the thread.

Ok. the same response I got from another poster. I said I disagree and we ended it there. not a big deal.



Now where did I post that? If that is what you got out of my posts then you should probably take some remedial English classes.

I only asked that he stay on topic. I think we should be able to agree that the answer wasn't about the thread.



Did you see the fight.? He destroyed Morales and didn't ko him because the one thing he lacks is power.

Of course you have no idea.



So if it's ok to bring up anyone, you shouldn't have said anything regarding my post.

i think it's you who's having a problem reading.

i said i only called you out on it because you cried about it to the other poster! had you not done that then we wouldnt even be having this conversation! read brotha! read!!!

[The Big Dunn]

so he didnt "destroyed" morales. outclass? yeah, destroyed? LOL!!!

you didn't answer if you saw the fight, so I take it you didn't. Dude I used the word destroyed for a reason. Go watch it.