The Big Dung loves english ****. Just ignore him - hes fckin useless and his posts are gayer than yusaf mack
Prime Pacquiao vs Crawford or Spence. Who wins?
Collapse
-
-
Says the man who is so ashamed of himself that he won't even admit what his own heritage is
Stay in your lane. Remember. You're my son
Which is why you're so shook you won't even quote me.
Lata, bltch.Comment
-
i've already mention my race numerous times on here. go play detective and you might see it.
stay in my lane? but i was. you came into it by quoting me... again!
cant even make this up. lol
Comment
-
In his prime I think he beats both. Crawford is still unproven, though I'd say he gives Pac a tougher fight because of his overall boxing skill and ability to switch from conventional to southpaw. Spence would look like his feet were planted in cement. Pac would counter and beat him to the punch. Margarito 2.0.Comment
-
Crawford and Spence are unproven still. Mannys resume ****s all over theirs. Crawford is 31 and spence is pushing 30 and they both have 0 ELITE wins combined between them.Comment
-
-
Just because you have been proven to be lying flip flopper on multiple occasions doesn't make me the same.
In no way did I compare them fighters. I mentioned they were champions because both are.Comment
-
Comment
-
I don't have a problem with changing my stance on your crush. I am not that enamored with anybody.
I told you archeologists to dig up how i used to do hopkins until he stepped up his game, then he earned my respect.
You mentioned Ray, Hearns, Crawford, and Spence in the same sentence. Once you found out how idiotic you sounded you tried to backtrack. Just own up to your garbage man. It'll be ok.Comment
-
Speaking of slurpers, it looks like you Floyd slurpers are turning to Spence slurpers. That explains why you are down with two guys who are at their peak "marinating" until they are overcookedComment
Comment