Prime Pacquiao vs Crawford or Spence. Who wins?

[IronDanHamza]

double ******. i'll give you that.

Ok perhaps it isn't just the language barrier.

[djtmal]

Right and the biggest point is you say fighters are ducking fighters then after they beat them call it a cherry pick.

It genuinely doesn't get more pathetic than that.

It genuinely doesn't get more pathetic than Floyd cherrypick his way through the second half of his career

[The Big Dunn]

What matters is I call you on your hypocritical, excuse laden, bogus posts, and how emotional you get in responding.
If I say Floyd was a cherrypicker, why you Boys get so emotional?Digging up **** I said 20 years ago is something only a supreme sav a ho would do.

A boxer fought the fight you called for and you call it a cherry pick because he won and the guy you wanted to win lost.

Don’t tell your dad you behave like this, he’d be utterly ashamed.

You must not be able to count because it surely wasn’t 20 years ago.

What kind of man behaves like this? SMDH!!!

[WesternChamp]

Ok perhaps it isn't just the language barrier.

i mean if i met a ******ed person, guess what im doing? walk the other way.

you on the other hand spent hours debating with a "******" in your words? lol.........

[IronDanHamza]

yes, i didnt mention morales in the first post because i said he fought nobody! then the post you quoted me and i respond i even said so he fought one known guy (morales) who else? and you never got back to me with that.

so fighting one known guy doesnt change anything! that's why i didnt mention morales in my first post (didnt think i even need too).

Your post is barely coherent.

You said he literally fought no one in your orginal post. I mentioned Morales and you asked me who else? There isn't really anyone else but that's irrelevant because you said he fought no one so obviously that includes Morales.

That's fine if your opinion of Morales is 2005 is the eqivulent to "no one". Fair enough if that's what you think.

Just means that Pacquaio lost to him and also his wins against him are meaningless.

[djtmal]

Dunn is an idiot.
We've seen Manny get in there with total style mismatches
We begged Floyd to, but always with the excuses.

[IronDanHamza]

i mean if i met a ******ed person, guess what im doing? walk the other way.

you on the other hand spent hours debating with a "******" in your words? lol.........

Don't think it's been hours.

You can't tell the time either? Is there anything you can do?

[WesternChamp]

Your post is barely coherent.

You said he literally fought no one in your orginal post. I mentioned Morales and you asked me who else? There isn't really anyone else but that's irrelevant because you said he fought no one so obviously that includes Morales.

That's fine if your opinion of Morales is 2005 is the eqivulent to "no one". Fair enough if that's what you think.

Just means that Pacquaio lost to him and also his wins against him are meaningless.

what are you not getting??? fighting one known guy doesnt mean shiiet when the rest of your resume is against cab drivers!! i explained this already. i never said morales is a nobody!

so going by your logic, ggg is the best right now right? even tho he hasnt really fought any big names except for canelo.. funny because he was getting criticize for fighting "nobody" yet you're on here hyping up raheem........

[WesternChamp]

Don't think it's been hours.

You can't tell the time either? Is there anything you can do?

first post you quoted me was yesterday (6/25), last post you quoted me today (6/26). how many hours has that been?

matter fact, forget about yesterday.

first post you quoted me today (10:39am)

last post you quoted me today (1:34pm)

i mean i didnt think anyone could out do travesty but damm you're making it very hard!! lol!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[QuickKO]

pacquiao wins