Originally posted by BigStomps
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: De La Hoya: Canelo-Jacobs Deal in Play, No 50-50 For Golovkin
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by fullers View PostAh I should have guessed you've never been married. Maybe women just aren't interested in guys like you who model themselves on Ike Turner, who are illiterate. I'm assuming women anyway, but thinking about it, probably more likely you're looking for a man. "I keep it real punk", lol, you sound like a mix between a middle aged try hard and Mr T. Anyway I've got work now, and you've got job queue to join. Enjoy your day. Good luck getting that elusive job tiger.
I've fucced plenty of married women in my lifetime, still am in fact. I've had biitches like you willing to leave their husbands and kids for me. That's how I roll punk!
When your an independent, hardworking, good looking guy like myself then there's never any shortage of women for me.
So me knowing how much of a slut most women really are, why would I wanna marry one?
I've got a good job, my own house and three cars so I'm set. I don't need a biitch for anything other than sex!
Your still a punk ass loser living in your momma's basement and living off welfare. You aren't on my level punk so stay off my **** you little biitch!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Shadoww702 View Post70/30 is where it started so it had to of gone up from there? As ESPN said Oscar, Canelo, and even LOEFFLER were coming up with a compromise And its GGG refusing to do 50/50. So the Sept. rematch not happening is ALL on GGG. Just like the May fight being ALL on Canelo.
Either way Im not gonna cry over spilled milk. Jacobs vs. Canelo is PERFECTLY fine with me. Plus Jacobs is an all around good guy who has a heck of a good story to tell. So im GLAD he got the fight and deserves it.
Now lets see which way GGG goes? Charlo, Sergiy, or the usual Bum/Tomato Can.
GGG fought the #1 (Canelo) and #2 (Jacobs) available fighters back to back in his division, and I'm struggling to think of other fighters in the past few years who've done that. Gassiev will be fighting at least the #1 available (Usyk) and fought the #2/#3 available (Dorticos). The guys who've fought #1, #2, or top notch fighters back to back are great company for GGG, either way. I think a soft touch (Vanes) is reasonable after those two fights, although fighting a MW would have made more sense for a MW fighter.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Snoop Frog View PostSpot on regarding both being at fault for fight #2 not happening (yet, hopefully).
GGG fought the #1 (Canelo) and #2 (Jacobs) available fighters back to back in his division, and I'm struggling to think of other fighters in the past few years who've done that. Gassiev will be fighting at least the #1 available (Usyk) and fought the #2/#3 available (Dorticos). The guys who've fought #1, #2, or top notch fighters back to back are great company for GGG, either way. I think a soft touch (Vanes) is reasonable after those two fights, although fighting a MW would have made more sense for a MW fighter.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Snoop Frog View PostSpot on regarding both being at fault for fight #2 not happening (yet, hopefully).
GGG fought the #1 (Canelo) and #2 (Jacobs) available fighters back to back in his division, and I'm struggling to think of other fighters in the past few years who've done that. Gassiev will be fighting at least the #1 available (Usyk) and fought the #2/#3 available (Dorticos). The guys who've fought #1, #2, or top notch fighters back to back are great company for GGG, either way. I think a soft touch (Vanes) is reasonable after those two fights, although fighting a MW would have made more sense for a MW fighter.
Comment
-
Originally posted by icha View Postcanelo fought trout and flyd back to back and then lara not much later... the jacobs fight was enforced and canelo fight was for the money, canelo fought floyd for the money too but his fights with trout and lara were considered legit high risk low reward fights...
Comment
-
Originally posted by Verus View PostI don't think that Canelo will get a bigger purse fighting Jacobs. I said, "Both will make good money." So you expect Canelo to drain Jacobs to 155 lbs for the fight. I will take you at your word. I see that reading and reasoning are not your strong suits.
Comment
-
Originally posted by BattlingNelson View PostSo Canelo-GGG 2 was allegedly a 100M USD fight. Even with a 50/50 split and a PPV against Jacobs, I’m confident that Canelo will goodbye to a truckload of money. How much is Jacobs fight worth for Canelo? 5-10M? I don’t know, but Canelo and GBP will kiss a truckload of money goodbye.
ggg is no bigger name than cotto was , canelo wont hesitate to show him the middle finger if he feels like...
Comment
-
Originally posted by aboutfkntime View PostGolovkin just BURNED the rematch
GTFOH
you clowns could not keep it real if your ass was on fire
explain this.....
And those "points" that you so painstakingly put together, have exactly nothing to do with the discussion of Golovkin vs Canelo II.
Comment
Comment